Those of which are similar to you would by example be in your league.
Foreshadows the aesthetics of an intrinsic bio-mechanical machine, made of not one however billions of individuals of varying perception.
In regard to ethical standards, this is relative to your personal scope of perception. I see no good/bad, everything simply is.
Is merely derived sub-cults of understanding, logically there is no particular right or wrong way to digest such material. However through the scientific method, the understanding of properties, and philosophical relativity one can derive a pretty straight forward understanding. Regardless of the dynamic nature.
Is a not a singular book with a singular author. Is a group of text, passed on from the proto-indoeuropean cultures. Over time they were re-interpreted into what you know the bible. Sex is irrelevant people of all kinds have contributed to the totality of the writings. And that level of understanding is localised to the understanding of the particular passage and its personal history.
Physics man, come on. What? Was beyond this, I said that was not particularly proper in such context. However under the defined context I had suggested as an alternative. Eg. interjecting a new level of understanding to make such proper there would be no issue. Which would have to be derived from altruism over our dominate avaricious natures.
I don't mind explaining things to a certain extent, however take some more time with what people say. Somethings I didn't go into detail as this will just keep going. Same as how I transcribed I was not discussing ethics which again you brought up. Instead of going into detail I just wrote it off. If you reply, I will not again. You haven't provided anything of value to my growth curve, rather have hinder such by being similar to a child in understanding.
That is your league, in no disregard meant. People of such are not able to take things at face value, analyse them, and research said information. Then and only then provide corresponding information expanding on the all ready provided data.
You have just repeated yourself and provided basic examples that are expected of people in such a league. Is not your fault, is societies as a whole. We are a very counter-productive race. Crude, and childish in entirety. Until our education standards are incorporated into physiological development as it should be it will never happen. Eg. how your type of people celebrate birthdays, and deaths and think it's all a big thing to work up about. You apply physiological development as a basis of mental imperative. I do not mean you as an individual rather a group.
Is self-conceded to think of ourselves as individuals. We should be a singular neural network, yet instead we operate in and our divided by caste systems. Eg. the league I referenced prior. Which is why we are so counter-productive.
Completely innate insanity is what it is, but as you yourself have exemplified is not about to change any time soon.
Was nice talking with though I really should learn to regress replying to such droll in the future. But you never know when someone is genuinely willing to listen and provide a respectable opinion. So is worth the risk.
Remember not to boast of self, rather of god and of the unity it brings. (you'll have a field day with this one, silly people don't know what god is.)
That's far too convuluted and patronising for me to bother even attempting to reply to, but I will say that I'll be 70 in a couple of years' time and in spite of a lack of formal education because I had to support myself from an early age, I have an intelligent mind and have worked out my personal approach to many complicated concepts.
I can also get my point of view across in an understandable way, not to mention succintly.
Goodbye, I have better things to do on an autumn sunday in my beautiful mountains: they and the river and my dog and my garden all make much more sense than you do
IIN that my dad makes comments about my body & makes me uncomfortable?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Those of which are similar to you would by example be in your league.
Foreshadows the aesthetics of an intrinsic bio-mechanical machine, made of not one however billions of individuals of varying perception.
In regard to ethical standards, this is relative to your personal scope of perception. I see no good/bad, everything simply is.
Is merely derived sub-cults of understanding, logically there is no particular right or wrong way to digest such material. However through the scientific method, the understanding of properties, and philosophical relativity one can derive a pretty straight forward understanding. Regardless of the dynamic nature.
Is a not a singular book with a singular author. Is a group of text, passed on from the proto-indoeuropean cultures. Over time they were re-interpreted into what you know the bible. Sex is irrelevant people of all kinds have contributed to the totality of the writings. And that level of understanding is localised to the understanding of the particular passage and its personal history.
Physics man, come on. What? Was beyond this, I said that was not particularly proper in such context. However under the defined context I had suggested as an alternative. Eg. interjecting a new level of understanding to make such proper there would be no issue. Which would have to be derived from altruism over our dominate avaricious natures.
I don't mind explaining things to a certain extent, however take some more time with what people say. Somethings I didn't go into detail as this will just keep going. Same as how I transcribed I was not discussing ethics which again you brought up. Instead of going into detail I just wrote it off. If you reply, I will not again. You haven't provided anything of value to my growth curve, rather have hinder such by being similar to a child in understanding.
That is your league, in no disregard meant. People of such are not able to take things at face value, analyse them, and research said information. Then and only then provide corresponding information expanding on the all ready provided data.
You have just repeated yourself and provided basic examples that are expected of people in such a league. Is not your fault, is societies as a whole. We are a very counter-productive race. Crude, and childish in entirety. Until our education standards are incorporated into physiological development as it should be it will never happen. Eg. how your type of people celebrate birthdays, and deaths and think it's all a big thing to work up about. You apply physiological development as a basis of mental imperative. I do not mean you as an individual rather a group.
Is self-conceded to think of ourselves as individuals. We should be a singular neural network, yet instead we operate in and our divided by caste systems. Eg. the league I referenced prior. Which is why we are so counter-productive.
Completely innate insanity is what it is, but as you yourself have exemplified is not about to change any time soon.
Was nice talking with though I really should learn to regress replying to such droll in the future. But you never know when someone is genuinely willing to listen and provide a respectable opinion. So is worth the risk.
Remember not to boast of self, rather of god and of the unity it brings. (you'll have a field day with this one, silly people don't know what god is.)
--
Ellenna
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
That's far too convuluted and patronising for me to bother even attempting to reply to, but I will say that I'll be 70 in a couple of years' time and in spite of a lack of formal education because I had to support myself from an early age, I have an intelligent mind and have worked out my personal approach to many complicated concepts.
I can also get my point of view across in an understandable way, not to mention succintly.
Goodbye, I have better things to do on an autumn sunday in my beautiful mountains: they and the river and my dog and my garden all make much more sense than you do