Monkeys have nothing to do with this issue because we're not monkeys ... well I'm not, how about you? They don't wear clothes or wear cooked food or use the internet either.
"Laying with those close"??? Just how close do you mean? Like father and daughter?
The bible is no help with this issue or similar ones: haven't you noticed there's nothing in the much-touted ten commandments about not raping women or sexually abusing children?
I don't think you're necessarily crazy but I do think you should turn your brain on before you get out of bed in the morning
We are descendents of the genus sapiens.... pretty monkey-like considering our subjective nature embedded by the avaricious will animals.
As close as an electromagnetic field permits, whomever involved seems irrelevant to me. Is denoted as altruistic bonding.
The bible is the greatest resource in the world next to the dictionary. My two favourite books. Which both are not solely based upon, if this is how you are interpreting these works in a literal sense you will not go very far. The ten-commandments are no different and no more correct, and or incorrect then our present day laws applied. Is merely code to live by. Doesn't mean anything, never said anything about it. Will not tell you my opinions on the matter because is irrelevant, and in vein.
Which is fine, that is your opinion. You're entitled to that much. Many people of your league have the same opinion.
And what "league" do you think that is? I don't belong to any "league" ....
We're also probably descendants of single cell creatures that crawled out of the primeval slime - what does that prove? Never heard of neuro plasticity? I'm always VERY suspicious of people who use the "descended from monkeys/apes/gorillas" argument, good excuse for some people to do what they like with no regard to any ethical standards.
The bible the "greatest resource in the world" yeah sure ........ If written works not stated to be fiction are not to be interpreted literally, how else does one interpret them? Of course the answer to that is obvious, every individual or crackpot sect interprets it according to what they want to do anyway - eg ISIS for a start, islam is based on the old testament too, you know, and look how fanatical fringe groups have interpreted that for their own ends and a lot of christian and jewish groups are no better.
It's just a book mate, a book written by no-one knows who for his/their own ends ... I deliberately haven't included /her in there, because no woman could've written the misogynist hateful crap which permeates the old testament.
You may love your dictionary & your bible but you need a third book on clear thinking and maybe a fourth one on clear expression: WTF do electromagnetic fields have to do with the issue under discussion? Altruistic bonding would surely be for the benefit of all individuals involved, which isn't the case here: one person is using his position of power to behave as he likes to his daughter whether or not she likes it - not the definition of altruistic which is in my dictionary
Those of which are similar to you would by example be in your league.
Foreshadows the aesthetics of an intrinsic bio-mechanical machine, made of not one however billions of individuals of varying perception.
In regard to ethical standards, this is relative to your personal scope of perception. I see no good/bad, everything simply is.
Is merely derived sub-cults of understanding, logically there is no particular right or wrong way to digest such material. However through the scientific method, the understanding of properties, and philosophical relativity one can derive a pretty straight forward understanding. Regardless of the dynamic nature.
Is a not a singular book with a singular author. Is a group of text, passed on from the proto-indoeuropean cultures. Over time they were re-interpreted into what you know the bible. Sex is irrelevant people of all kinds have contributed to the totality of the writings. And that level of understanding is localised to the understanding of the particular passage and its personal history.
Physics man, come on. What? Was beyond this, I said that was not particularly proper in such context. However under the defined context I had suggested as an alternative. Eg. interjecting a new level of understanding to make such proper there would be no issue. Which would have to be derived from altruism over our dominate avaricious natures.
I don't mind explaining things to a certain extent, however take some more time with what people say. Somethings I didn't go into detail as this will just keep going. Same as how I transcribed I was not discussing ethics which again you brought up. Instead of going into detail I just wrote it off. If you reply, I will not again. You haven't provided anything of value to my growth curve, rather have hinder such by being similar to a child in understanding.
That is your league, in no disregard meant. People of such are not able to take things at face value, analyse them, and research said information. Then and only then provide corresponding information expanding on the all ready provided data.
You have just repeated yourself and provided basic examples that are expected of people in such a league. Is not your fault, is societies as a whole. We are a very counter-productive race. Crude, and childish in entirety. Until our education standards are incorporated into physiological development as it should be it will never happen. Eg. how your type of people celebrate birthdays, and deaths and think it's all a big thing to work up about. You apply physiological development as a basis of mental imperative. I do not mean you as an individual rather a group.
Is self-conceded to think of ourselves as individuals. We should be a singular neural network, yet instead we operate in and our divided by caste systems. Eg. the league I referenced prior. Which is why we are so counter-productive.
Completely innate insanity is what it is, but as you yourself have exemplified is not about to change any time soon.
Was nice talking with though I really should learn to regress replying to such droll in the future. But you never know when someone is genuinely willing to listen and provide a respectable opinion. So is worth the risk.
Remember not to boast of self, rather of god and of the unity it brings. (you'll have a field day with this one, silly people don't know what god is.)
That's far too convuluted and patronising for me to bother even attempting to reply to, but I will say that I'll be 70 in a couple of years' time and in spite of a lack of formal education because I had to support myself from an early age, I have an intelligent mind and have worked out my personal approach to many complicated concepts.
I can also get my point of view across in an understandable way, not to mention succintly.
Goodbye, I have better things to do on an autumn sunday in my beautiful mountains: they and the river and my dog and my garden all make much more sense than you do
IIN that my dad makes comments about my body & makes me uncomfortable?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Monkeys have nothing to do with this issue because we're not monkeys ... well I'm not, how about you? They don't wear clothes or wear cooked food or use the internet either.
"Laying with those close"??? Just how close do you mean? Like father and daughter?
The bible is no help with this issue or similar ones: haven't you noticed there's nothing in the much-touted ten commandments about not raping women or sexually abusing children?
I don't think you're necessarily crazy but I do think you should turn your brain on before you get out of bed in the morning
--
despuit
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
We are descendents of the genus sapiens.... pretty monkey-like considering our subjective nature embedded by the avaricious will animals.
As close as an electromagnetic field permits, whomever involved seems irrelevant to me. Is denoted as altruistic bonding.
The bible is the greatest resource in the world next to the dictionary. My two favourite books. Which both are not solely based upon, if this is how you are interpreting these works in a literal sense you will not go very far. The ten-commandments are no different and no more correct, and or incorrect then our present day laws applied. Is merely code to live by. Doesn't mean anything, never said anything about it. Will not tell you my opinions on the matter because is irrelevant, and in vein.
Which is fine, that is your opinion. You're entitled to that much. Many people of your league have the same opinion.
--
Ellenna
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
And what "league" do you think that is? I don't belong to any "league" ....
We're also probably descendants of single cell creatures that crawled out of the primeval slime - what does that prove? Never heard of neuro plasticity? I'm always VERY suspicious of people who use the "descended from monkeys/apes/gorillas" argument, good excuse for some people to do what they like with no regard to any ethical standards.
The bible the "greatest resource in the world" yeah sure ........ If written works not stated to be fiction are not to be interpreted literally, how else does one interpret them? Of course the answer to that is obvious, every individual or crackpot sect interprets it according to what they want to do anyway - eg ISIS for a start, islam is based on the old testament too, you know, and look how fanatical fringe groups have interpreted that for their own ends and a lot of christian and jewish groups are no better.
It's just a book mate, a book written by no-one knows who for his/their own ends ... I deliberately haven't included /her in there, because no woman could've written the misogynist hateful crap which permeates the old testament.
You may love your dictionary & your bible but you need a third book on clear thinking and maybe a fourth one on clear expression: WTF do electromagnetic fields have to do with the issue under discussion? Altruistic bonding would surely be for the benefit of all individuals involved, which isn't the case here: one person is using his position of power to behave as he likes to his daughter whether or not she likes it - not the definition of altruistic which is in my dictionary
a
--
despuit
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Those of which are similar to you would by example be in your league.
Foreshadows the aesthetics of an intrinsic bio-mechanical machine, made of not one however billions of individuals of varying perception.
In regard to ethical standards, this is relative to your personal scope of perception. I see no good/bad, everything simply is.
Is merely derived sub-cults of understanding, logically there is no particular right or wrong way to digest such material. However through the scientific method, the understanding of properties, and philosophical relativity one can derive a pretty straight forward understanding. Regardless of the dynamic nature.
Is a not a singular book with a singular author. Is a group of text, passed on from the proto-indoeuropean cultures. Over time they were re-interpreted into what you know the bible. Sex is irrelevant people of all kinds have contributed to the totality of the writings. And that level of understanding is localised to the understanding of the particular passage and its personal history.
Physics man, come on. What? Was beyond this, I said that was not particularly proper in such context. However under the defined context I had suggested as an alternative. Eg. interjecting a new level of understanding to make such proper there would be no issue. Which would have to be derived from altruism over our dominate avaricious natures.
I don't mind explaining things to a certain extent, however take some more time with what people say. Somethings I didn't go into detail as this will just keep going. Same as how I transcribed I was not discussing ethics which again you brought up. Instead of going into detail I just wrote it off. If you reply, I will not again. You haven't provided anything of value to my growth curve, rather have hinder such by being similar to a child in understanding.
That is your league, in no disregard meant. People of such are not able to take things at face value, analyse them, and research said information. Then and only then provide corresponding information expanding on the all ready provided data.
You have just repeated yourself and provided basic examples that are expected of people in such a league. Is not your fault, is societies as a whole. We are a very counter-productive race. Crude, and childish in entirety. Until our education standards are incorporated into physiological development as it should be it will never happen. Eg. how your type of people celebrate birthdays, and deaths and think it's all a big thing to work up about. You apply physiological development as a basis of mental imperative. I do not mean you as an individual rather a group.
Is self-conceded to think of ourselves as individuals. We should be a singular neural network, yet instead we operate in and our divided by caste systems. Eg. the league I referenced prior. Which is why we are so counter-productive.
Completely innate insanity is what it is, but as you yourself have exemplified is not about to change any time soon.
Was nice talking with though I really should learn to regress replying to such droll in the future. But you never know when someone is genuinely willing to listen and provide a respectable opinion. So is worth the risk.
Remember not to boast of self, rather of god and of the unity it brings. (you'll have a field day with this one, silly people don't know what god is.)
--
Ellenna
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
That's far too convuluted and patronising for me to bother even attempting to reply to, but I will say that I'll be 70 in a couple of years' time and in spite of a lack of formal education because I had to support myself from an early age, I have an intelligent mind and have worked out my personal approach to many complicated concepts.
I can also get my point of view across in an understandable way, not to mention succintly.
Goodbye, I have better things to do on an autumn sunday in my beautiful mountains: they and the river and my dog and my garden all make much more sense than you do