How is that wrong? Offspring is the proper, biological term for "children." Also the second part of your last sentence had nothing to do with the first part.
I don't want to disagree with you because I often notice your posts and like you very much, but I think this a small matter of semantics. I think it may be down to the word "own". I can't answer for zchristian but I think it was a matter of owning one's children and that you should somehow "own" them more if they are disabled. I'm not sure either of us agrees with that.
IIN that my colleague brought his mentally handicapped son to work?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
How is that wrong? Offspring is the proper, biological term for "children." Also the second part of your last sentence had nothing to do with the first part.
--
Charmo
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
5
5
-
hundredthousand
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Unless you are a cotton farmer in the south living in the 17th century, you do not 'own' other human beings.
I don't want to disagree with you because I often notice your posts and like you very much, but I think this a small matter of semantics. I think it may be down to the word "own". I can't answer for zchristian but I think it was a matter of owning one's children and that you should somehow "own" them more if they are disabled. I'm not sure either of us agrees with that.
--
VsegdaTemnata
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
I somehow didn't notice the word "own." Well, don't mind me, hehe :)
but thank you! I really appreciate the compliment, hundredthousand :D