I myself have never watched child porn. But I stumbled upon a website and looked through it, only to find pictures of nude girls who did not look over 18. Which is why I looked up if it was illegal just to view it, because I was worried I was going to get into trouble just by accidentally seeing it. (also, this website I found was of <a href="http://stickam.com" rel="nofollow">stickam.com</a> vids, a website where 10-17 year old sluts go fully nude and play with eachother [willingly, either for free, or private sessions for paid customers], because it turns them on to turn on others. And I bet that the OP's bf was looking at stickam/omegle/webcam pictures of girls willingly taking them)
But I do look at young girls wearing skimpy underwear/bikinis, lingerie, and hand/hair bras. And those are professional pre teen models getting paid, and I'd say those are probably sluts.
I probably shouldn't have spoken about the actresses in child porn since I haven't watched it, but it seems like they'd have to be enjoying it for people to like it. You'd really have to be a sicko to enjoy watching a kid get painfully raped.
And as far as production goes, I never said anything about production as this post doesn't pertain to that. But since you ask, I don't know what to think about production, as I know nothing about it. I just said it's harmless to view free child porn, and that simply viewing it doesn't contribute anything to the people who originally produced it.
That's a bit differ to a child, like an infant, who's being sexually abused on camera and/or having pictures taken in naked poses. Do you agree the making of such porn can be damaging to a child?
Is it normal that my boyfriend was looking at pictures of child porn?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I myself have never watched child porn. But I stumbled upon a website and looked through it, only to find pictures of nude girls who did not look over 18. Which is why I looked up if it was illegal just to view it, because I was worried I was going to get into trouble just by accidentally seeing it. (also, this website I found was of <a href="http://stickam.com" rel="nofollow">stickam.com</a> vids, a website where 10-17 year old sluts go fully nude and play with eachother [willingly, either for free, or private sessions for paid customers], because it turns them on to turn on others. And I bet that the OP's bf was looking at stickam/omegle/webcam pictures of girls willingly taking them)
But I do look at young girls wearing skimpy underwear/bikinis, lingerie, and hand/hair bras. And those are professional pre teen models getting paid, and I'd say those are probably sluts.
I probably shouldn't have spoken about the actresses in child porn since I haven't watched it, but it seems like they'd have to be enjoying it for people to like it. You'd really have to be a sicko to enjoy watching a kid get painfully raped.
And as far as production goes, I never said anything about production as this post doesn't pertain to that. But since you ask, I don't know what to think about production, as I know nothing about it. I just said it's harmless to view free child porn, and that simply viewing it doesn't contribute anything to the people who originally produced it.
--
TweedRanger
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
That's a bit differ to a child, like an infant, who's being sexually abused on camera and/or having pictures taken in naked poses. Do you agree the making of such porn can be damaging to a child?
Are you a pedophile?
--
davesumba
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yes, I am a pedophile, and you are turning me on with talk like that.