I think that this "theory" is quite inaccurate - even if the OP's boyfriend was not circumcised it is unlikely that it would cause such problems with his (in)ability to orgasm from his girlfriend's stimulation. Actually, the opposite is likely to be true - i.e. if a guy is circumcised, he may last longer in comparison with uncircumcised guy (in general, of course, there are individual differences so it is not always so) and the explanation why it is so is often cited by sexogists or mentioned in books dealing with sexual dysfunctions. The head of a circumcised penis is exposed all the time and becomes less sensitive as a result of constant friction. In case of uncircumcised penis, it is covered by foreskin when the penis is flacid so it doesn't become less sensitive because of constant friction. When the uncircumcied penis is erect, foreskin usually retracts, head of the penis becomes exposed and its full sensitivity causes that less intense stimulation is required to make an uncircumcised guy cum.
Hey, thanks for yet he info. You. Destroyed a misconception I had. I looked it up, and you're quite right; I stand corrected. So maybe I was on the right track after all, because she says her b/f's circumcised.
Thanks. I am glad that my comment has served a good purpose. Not all people are as open-minded as you are to different opinions to look it up somewhere. I think it was useful that you pointed to the influence of circumcision - at least some people who haven't realized this factor may play a role here are aware that circumcision may impact the sensitivity and the intensity of stimulation needed to achieve an orgasm.
Is it normal that my boyfriend doesn't cum?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I think that this "theory" is quite inaccurate - even if the OP's boyfriend was not circumcised it is unlikely that it would cause such problems with his (in)ability to orgasm from his girlfriend's stimulation. Actually, the opposite is likely to be true - i.e. if a guy is circumcised, he may last longer in comparison with uncircumcised guy (in general, of course, there are individual differences so it is not always so) and the explanation why it is so is often cited by sexogists or mentioned in books dealing with sexual dysfunctions. The head of a circumcised penis is exposed all the time and becomes less sensitive as a result of constant friction. In case of uncircumcised penis, it is covered by foreskin when the penis is flacid so it doesn't become less sensitive because of constant friction. When the uncircumcied penis is erect, foreskin usually retracts, head of the penis becomes exposed and its full sensitivity causes that less intense stimulation is required to make an uncircumcised guy cum.
--
DADNSCAL
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Hey, thanks for yet he info. You. Destroyed a misconception I had. I looked it up, and you're quite right; I stand corrected. So maybe I was on the right track after all, because she says her b/f's circumcised.
--
Naamah
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Thanks. I am glad that my comment has served a good purpose. Not all people are as open-minded as you are to different opinions to look it up somewhere. I think it was useful that you pointed to the influence of circumcision - at least some people who haven't realized this factor may play a role here are aware that circumcision may impact the sensitivity and the intensity of stimulation needed to achieve an orgasm.