Is it normal that in sex chemistry is temporary, love is forever?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

← View full post
Comments ( 2 ) Sort: best | oldest
  • georgienne
    12 years ago | pl

    I think chemistry is what we depend on to spark the relationship, not keep it going.
    It grabs our attention enough for us to learn the other person and then let's us take up the lead.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    Report
    2
    2
      -
    • lsuccv
      12 years ago | pl

      georgienne, love this comment, it is so true.

      Surely that raw 'I've got to have you now feeling' doesn't last forever? As soon as you hit that long term relationship stage where he's comforatble enough to scratch his butt and sniff it, it's more love keeping you together than chemistry. My sister was even told by her boyfriend 'please don't walk around naked anymore because I won't get turned on in the bedroom'. So the mere seeing your partner naked more often means that chemistry is lost for some people. I'm just yet to meet anyone who has been married or in a long term relationship and still feels that 'I need to have you now' feeling. Is there anyone out there?
      I'm not saying chemisrty doesn't matter, I'm just questioning whether it should be such a decisive factor in relationships.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
      Report
      1
      1