I remember literally not being able to put that book down. There were so many little twists and turns but the ending was the biggest twist of them all. Its a shame Koushun hasn't written anything since.
Interesting, however, my plan differs substantially from the cited work of literature.
Firstly, it is not Authoritarian in nature, and no one will be forced to comply. Instead, the prisoners will be given an opportunity to receive a 'Get out of prison free' reward. In exchange, they will need to sign legal waivers for allowing the sexual sterilization procedure (spayed or neutered), implantation of the GPS devices and absolving any future legal action for the risks (potential injury) involved.
For the 'squawkers', we can just invite them to go there to help resolve the situation. Most will back down, I think. For the others, we can always use trickery or deceit (Ethical) to get them to board the plane. Then we can make a deal with them (i.e. sign the legal waiver, and we will give you a parachute).
Of course, we will also provide a copy of the 'Rules' to each prisoner, and ask them to behave in a Humanitarian and Ethical way.
Also, they will be reminded that if they choose to live by a gun, they will die by a gun (should they come across any and are able to obtain these or other military equipment), except and unless their life is in a clear and present (immediate) state of danger. They should, therefore, destroy weaponry that they might come across. (*Also, not to go near nuclear sites).
Now, has Mr. Kim and his Generals come to their sensibilities yet?
It's really quite easy to defuse this situation. Mr. Kim should phone Mr. Kerry. Mr. Kim should ask Mr. Kerry for help, to dismantle all nuclear sites and weapons in North Korea. In exchange, Mr. Kerry will offer Mr. Kim help in developing clean, green, sustainable Geothermal Energy resources and Sustainable Agricultural Practices, in order to feed the millions of starving people there. The best way to do this, is to formulate a plan for population reduction (half the population, twice as much food for everyone). This does not absolve neighbouring countries (Eastern China, South Korea and Japan) from also reducing their populations, which will help to ease tensions in the region.
To be fair, Mr. Kim has a point. We (USA), do not have any military business in that region. No one is going to attack the Northern New World continent, in the foreseeable future. With Gary Johnson I agree that we should close these bases and move these troops home (unless they are there to help the local population in building sustainable infrastructure). If anyone 'decides' to attack any of our friends across the water, then, we should deal with them accordingly.
Is it normal that I want the US to go to war with North Korea?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Have you ever read "Battle Royale" by Koushun Takami? I ask because there are certain things in your comment that remind me of the book.
--
anti-hero
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
-
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
That book kicks ass.
--
Avant-Garde
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I remember literally not being able to put that book down. There were so many little twists and turns but the ending was the biggest twist of them all. Its a shame Koushun hasn't written anything since.
--
anti-hero
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I couldn't agree more.
No, I have not read that book, but I will make a point to research it, thanks.
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Interesting, however, my plan differs substantially from the cited work of literature.
Firstly, it is not Authoritarian in nature, and no one will be forced to comply. Instead, the prisoners will be given an opportunity to receive a 'Get out of prison free' reward. In exchange, they will need to sign legal waivers for allowing the sexual sterilization procedure (spayed or neutered), implantation of the GPS devices and absolving any future legal action for the risks (potential injury) involved.
For the 'squawkers', we can just invite them to go there to help resolve the situation. Most will back down, I think. For the others, we can always use trickery or deceit (Ethical) to get them to board the plane. Then we can make a deal with them (i.e. sign the legal waiver, and we will give you a parachute).
Of course, we will also provide a copy of the 'Rules' to each prisoner, and ask them to behave in a Humanitarian and Ethical way.
Also, they will be reminded that if they choose to live by a gun, they will die by a gun (should they come across any and are able to obtain these or other military equipment), except and unless their life is in a clear and present (immediate) state of danger. They should, therefore, destroy weaponry that they might come across. (*Also, not to go near nuclear sites).
Now, has Mr. Kim and his Generals come to their sensibilities yet?
It's really quite easy to defuse this situation. Mr. Kim should phone Mr. Kerry. Mr. Kim should ask Mr. Kerry for help, to dismantle all nuclear sites and weapons in North Korea. In exchange, Mr. Kerry will offer Mr. Kim help in developing clean, green, sustainable Geothermal Energy resources and Sustainable Agricultural Practices, in order to feed the millions of starving people there. The best way to do this, is to formulate a plan for population reduction (half the population, twice as much food for everyone). This does not absolve neighbouring countries (Eastern China, South Korea and Japan) from also reducing their populations, which will help to ease tensions in the region.
To be fair, Mr. Kim has a point. We (USA), do not have any military business in that region. No one is going to attack the Northern New World continent, in the foreseeable future. With Gary Johnson I agree that we should close these bases and move these troops home (unless they are there to help the local population in building sustainable infrastructure). If anyone 'decides' to attack any of our friends across the water, then, we should deal with them accordingly.