First of all mieoux the poster is a she, and a young she, who is in no hurry to have children, I'm pretty sure that doesn't count as "waiting".
Second of all the gene is not the driver behind development. If you had any clue about evolution you would know that evolution is a series of changes in response to the environment. This brings me on to my third point:
Nature/the gene is not a sentient thing that deliberately chooses to eject people from the gene pool.
Also, given that there is a global food shortage that worsens every day as the population grows at an ever increasing speed, the people that choose not to reproduce are actually doing society a favor.
Anxiety_sucks, ugly people don't detract from society and a predisposition for any behaviour type does not guarantee its manifestation. While carrying the gene for Huntington’s disease does guarantee its manifestation and is being selectively bred out of the population.
Last of all, there are so many different kinds of intelligence and so many genes for each of them, that the diversity of the human race could not be adversely affected. And just because Hitler was evil, doesn't mean everything he said was crap.
I think it should be based on income and how long they were well off. I am sure some of these basketball players are taking great care of their kids and are complete idiots. Not saying all athletes are stupid either. However some very rich people are really stupid and still make a good life for their family. Also if we go by intelligence I think we would have to go by psychology too. As in if someone who is remarkably intelligent is not also insane like "Ted bundy" for example.
Is it normal that I think that stupid people should be sterilised?
← View full post
First of all mieoux the poster is a she, and a young she, who is in no hurry to have children, I'm pretty sure that doesn't count as "waiting".
Second of all the gene is not the driver behind development. If you had any clue about evolution you would know that evolution is a series of changes in response to the environment. This brings me on to my third point:
Nature/the gene is not a sentient thing that deliberately chooses to eject people from the gene pool.
Also, given that there is a global food shortage that worsens every day as the population grows at an ever increasing speed, the people that choose not to reproduce are actually doing society a favor.
Anxiety_sucks, ugly people don't detract from society and a predisposition for any behaviour type does not guarantee its manifestation. While carrying the gene for Huntington’s disease does guarantee its manifestation and is being selectively bred out of the population.
Last of all, there are so many different kinds of intelligence and so many genes for each of them, that the diversity of the human race could not be adversely affected. And just because Hitler was evil, doesn't mean everything he said was crap.
--
RomeoDeMontague
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I think it should be based on income and how long they were well off. I am sure some of these basketball players are taking great care of their kids and are complete idiots. Not saying all athletes are stupid either. However some very rich people are really stupid and still make a good life for their family. Also if we go by intelligence I think we would have to go by psychology too. As in if someone who is remarkably intelligent is not also insane like "Ted bundy" for example.