Basicall, what we have here, Charli, is: "We all has opinionz, so dat means dat all da opinionz r equally correct. Oh, you're this, you're that, you're all these bad things". Yada, yada.
You would rather type out nothing but insults rather than explain how I am wrong and then you are going to say I am often emotional over logical? Sorry, hun, your standard of "logic" is faulty, so I won't be taking you seriously there.
So, let's get this straight.
I post my point explaining how thi is wrong.
You respond with a strawman arguement.
I respond explaining my point with reason, again.
You respond again with shaming.
And you have the nerve to even say the word "logic"?
"That's why people thumb you down instead of "debating". And don't give me the "I admit when I'm wrong" shit. You don't."
No, the reason is that you are over-emotional people. I might add emotion in my comments but it never cancels out logic, I can explain to you why you are wrong while telling you how much of a douche you are, where as all you can do is say that I'm a douche.
It shows by how I can post a comment and you, being the douche that you are, would spend the time to comment and try and shame me out of my position (God fuckin' luck with that) but in that time you could of explained how I was wrong with logic if you had the ability to, so what does that tell you? That you have nothing.
"And don't give me the I admmit I was wrong shit", yes I do...What, because I don't apologize here for not being wrong I don't do it? You know the irony of you even saying this?
You have a lot of nerve even uttering the words logic.
But wait, let me check my crytal ball, Charli.
-Checks the crystal ball-
I believe the future of comments of yours will be along the lines of: "RARGH STRAWMAN STRAWMAN STRAWMAN! INSULTS INSULTS INSULTS! NOT ADDRESSING THE POINTS!"
Is it normal that I think guys and girls should be treated equal?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Basicall, what we have here, Charli, is: "We all has opinionz, so dat means dat all da opinionz r equally correct. Oh, you're this, you're that, you're all these bad things". Yada, yada.
You would rather type out nothing but insults rather than explain how I am wrong and then you are going to say I am often emotional over logical? Sorry, hun, your standard of "logic" is faulty, so I won't be taking you seriously there.
So, let's get this straight.
I post my point explaining how thi is wrong.
You respond with a strawman arguement.
I respond explaining my point with reason, again.
You respond again with shaming.
And you have the nerve to even say the word "logic"?
"That's why people thumb you down instead of "debating". And don't give me the "I admit when I'm wrong" shit. You don't."
No, the reason is that you are over-emotional people. I might add emotion in my comments but it never cancels out logic, I can explain to you why you are wrong while telling you how much of a douche you are, where as all you can do is say that I'm a douche.
It shows by how I can post a comment and you, being the douche that you are, would spend the time to comment and try and shame me out of my position (God fuckin' luck with that) but in that time you could of explained how I was wrong with logic if you had the ability to, so what does that tell you? That you have nothing.
"And don't give me the I admmit I was wrong shit", yes I do...What, because I don't apologize here for not being wrong I don't do it? You know the irony of you even saying this?
You have a lot of nerve even uttering the words logic.
But wait, let me check my crytal ball, Charli.
-Checks the crystal ball-
I believe the future of comments of yours will be along the lines of: "RARGH STRAWMAN STRAWMAN STRAWMAN! INSULTS INSULTS INSULTS! NOT ADDRESSING THE POINTS!"
Because you're that fucking predictable.