I'm all for ACTUAL self-defense. But, when white trash, inner city thugs, or anybody decides to take the law into their own hands, then I'd like nothing more than to curtail their freedom (which was written 243 years ago by people who were used to muskets).
Considering the men who wrote the second amendment were intelligent, educated individuals (Many were themselves inventors and patent holders) it is safe to assume they could foresee future innovations in the world including the world of firearms. They were probably aware that 300 years prior to the writing of the second amendment Leonardo Di Vinci was designing tanks, flying machines, and machine guns. The problem was getting them to work.
At the time of the second amendments ratification, 1791, there already existed, the Puckle gun, The Chambers flintlock machine gun (the design was submitted to the fledgling US War Department in 1792), Flintlock Repeating Pistol with Lorenzoni Action ( the Lorenzoni system allowed for up to ten successive shots, feeding from a magazine concealed inside the grip. A half-turn of the lever forward and back reloaded, primed, and cocked the pistol.Designed in 1680),the Giordani Rifle (.46 caliber, 22 round capacity magazine repeating airifle adopted by the Austrian Army in 1780)
As to your comment "But, when white trash, inner city thugs, or anybody decides to take the law into their own hands, then I'd like nothing more than to curtail their freedom". It is customary for them to be thrown in jail no matter what methods they use.
The people that wrote the constitution also advocated for citizens owning canons. They wanted citizens to own any weapon the military had. Because the constitution wasnt for hunting it was to protect American citizens from the American government. There's a famous saying that Mao once said "political power comes down the barrel of a gun". And that's so true. Whoever has the guns has the power. Every dictator takes the guns before the genocide hitler, mao, pol pot, and stalin ALL took the guns before mass executions. Because without guns there's no chance of a revolution (or even a threat of one).
In all honesty, I'm just trying to punish gun owners, as I perceive many of them to be extremely unkind people. Yes, I know the second amendment is supposed to protect us from the worst abuses of power imaginable, but the only thing I hate more than oppressive cops are vigilantes.
is it normal that i think 9/11 was well-deserved
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I'm all for ACTUAL self-defense. But, when white trash, inner city thugs, or anybody decides to take the law into their own hands, then I'd like nothing more than to curtail their freedom (which was written 243 years ago by people who were used to muskets).
--
CozmoWank
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
FromTheSouthWeirdMan
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Considering the men who wrote the second amendment were intelligent, educated individuals (Many were themselves inventors and patent holders) it is safe to assume they could foresee future innovations in the world including the world of firearms. They were probably aware that 300 years prior to the writing of the second amendment Leonardo Di Vinci was designing tanks, flying machines, and machine guns. The problem was getting them to work.
At the time of the second amendments ratification, 1791, there already existed, the Puckle gun, The Chambers flintlock machine gun (the design was submitted to the fledgling US War Department in 1792), Flintlock Repeating Pistol with Lorenzoni Action ( the Lorenzoni system allowed for up to ten successive shots, feeding from a magazine concealed inside the grip. A half-turn of the lever forward and back reloaded, primed, and cocked the pistol.Designed in 1680),the Giordani Rifle (.46 caliber, 22 round capacity magazine repeating airifle adopted by the Austrian Army in 1780)
As to your comment "But, when white trash, inner city thugs, or anybody decides to take the law into their own hands, then I'd like nothing more than to curtail their freedom". It is customary for them to be thrown in jail no matter what methods they use.
The people that wrote the constitution also advocated for citizens owning canons. They wanted citizens to own any weapon the military had. Because the constitution wasnt for hunting it was to protect American citizens from the American government. There's a famous saying that Mao once said "political power comes down the barrel of a gun". And that's so true. Whoever has the guns has the power. Every dictator takes the guns before the genocide hitler, mao, pol pot, and stalin ALL took the guns before mass executions. Because without guns there's no chance of a revolution (or even a threat of one).
--
randomperson1000000
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
In all honesty, I'm just trying to punish gun owners, as I perceive many of them to be extremely unkind people. Yes, I know the second amendment is supposed to protect us from the worst abuses of power imaginable, but the only thing I hate more than oppressive cops are vigilantes.