You are right with the very first part of my statement it would alone sound like I was declaring myself a psychopath, I then use the word however and give a conscious reason why I feel the way I feel which is not the result of some underlying mental disorder. Maybe I should of worded it differently. I suppose a second argument could be put forward that I said 'nearly all' which again presumes there is something missing for me to actually be considered a psychopath.
I know what both words mean, the big bang is a proposed explanation with supporting evidence ergo it's a theory not a hypothesis. A hypothesis is a proposed explanation which is yet to be tested, which is the basis of all protocols we write. I'm sure you already knew that though seen as you know everything. With that in mind though I would love to hear how the big bang can be considered both a theory and a hypothesis at the same time seen as they are two separate but commonly confused terms.
Is it normal that i kinda wish i was a pychopath...
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
You are right with the very first part of my statement it would alone sound like I was declaring myself a psychopath, I then use the word however and give a conscious reason why I feel the way I feel which is not the result of some underlying mental disorder. Maybe I should of worded it differently. I suppose a second argument could be put forward that I said 'nearly all' which again presumes there is something missing for me to actually be considered a psychopath.
I know what both words mean, the big bang is a proposed explanation with supporting evidence ergo it's a theory not a hypothesis. A hypothesis is a proposed explanation which is yet to be tested, which is the basis of all protocols we write. I'm sure you already knew that though seen as you know everything. With that in mind though I would love to hear how the big bang can be considered both a theory and a hypothesis at the same time seen as they are two separate but commonly confused terms.