Well there's no 'belief' in science that says nobody matters, however I think it's just our own egocentric perspective-we think others' lives don't matter since we don't interact with them in any meaningful way.
Though I do share in your view that there are billions of people who are completely useless and if they disappeared, human civilization might even be the better for it.
To an extent I'm a eugenicists, but not in the Nazi sense, more in terms of refining the gene pool by preventing losers from breeding. Though I'm sure it'd open a can of worms.
Secondly 'scientific belief' is an oxymoron, there is no scientific basis for your subjective opinion that 'nobody on this planet matters.' So don't use the word 'science' in a sense when you have no idea what you're talking about.
I'm not telling you what you believe, you said it yourself and I said I agreed to an extent, dumbass.
But there is one thing we are alike, that we wouldn't care if a large fraction of the human population disappeared. So why are you contradicting yourself?
Ok Mr Know-it-all.
Firstly I didn't proclaim to be a psychopath, if you read my first statement correctly you will see I was actually saying I don't think I am.
Secondly you are still trying to tell me what I do or don't believe in because your saying what I believe in is not scientific. My opinion may be just an opinion but I have come to my own conclusions due to studying different areas of science, mainly astrophysics, evolution and neurology. Due to the complex nature of what I actually believe in, it could never be proven but it is still a scientific belief. The big bang theory can never be proven but that also is still a scientific belief.
And in regards to me not knowing what I'm talking about, well I have multiple degrees in various areas of science including a postgraduate so I like to think I know a little bit about what I'm talking about.
"Firstly I didn't proclaim to be a psychopath, if you read my first statement correctly you will see I was actually saying I don't think I am."
Oh you mean this statement:
"I check nearly all the boxes which are required to be considered a psychopath"
Where you declare that you check all the boxes to be considered a psychopath, read "correctly" would mean the exact opposite of that? Talk about contradicting yourself.
Ya I'm in agreement with you, you definitely are a psychopath and given your self-contradicting nature, a schizophrenic.
If your 'belief' cannot be 'proven' then it is the opposite of science. You seem to have no clue what science involves. Both my undergrad and graduate degrees are in science and I can easily see through your bullshit.
The Big Bang theory is not a 'belief', which is the acceptance of a claim as fact without evidence. Rather it is a scientific hypothesis, which based on the evidence leads to the conclusion that our universe originated from the big bang.
You sound like too much of a dumbass to have even entered first year undergrad, let alone complete multiple degrees. So you're probably just lying or you got your degree by mail order.
I don't know whether you are intentionally misreading my first sentence or you simply do not understand simple English, either way if you were to read it in its entirety you would see I am proclaiming the exact opposite.
I fucking hate it when people try and argue semantics to make their point. If the word belief goes directly against the grain of science then why in most scientific conclusions do the authors write 'we believe' even if their results are conclusive?
Just to clarify the big bang is a theory, not a hypothesis, for someone so into science I figured you would know the difference.
So let me get this straight, when you said "I check nearly all the boxes required to be considered a psychopath" you are saying that it means the opposite, that you're not a psychopath?
You're really fucking stupid or have some kind of mental illness for affirming something, then declaring you meant the exact opposite. I find it funny and ironic you're putting it back on me, when clearly you're the one with the serious comprehension problems.
If I "check all the boxes" for some disorder, that means I have that disorder you fucking retard. So keep trying to invert the meaning, people will read this and agree that you really are a moron.
There is no scientific basis in your 'belief'. You attached the word 'scientific' to try to sound more credible and add an air of legitimacy to nothing more than a subjective opinion.
If and when scientists claim 'we believe the universe started from the big bang' what that means is based on all the scientific evidence, it can be concluded it came from a big bang. Semantics do matter in this case, a subject you have no knowledge of, nor of science as it is self-evident.
For a person who alleges to have many science degrees, you seem to be utterly clueless on it's principles and definitions.
Again your lack of scientific education is starkly apparent-the big bang is a hypothesis as well as a theory. Now why don't you look up what both words mean so I don't have to keep schooling you and wasting my time?
Is it normal that i kinda wish i was a pychopath...
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Well there's no 'belief' in science that says nobody matters, however I think it's just our own egocentric perspective-we think others' lives don't matter since we don't interact with them in any meaningful way.
Though I do share in your view that there are billions of people who are completely useless and if they disappeared, human civilization might even be the better for it.
To an extent I'm a eugenicists, but not in the Nazi sense, more in terms of refining the gene pool by preventing losers from breeding. Though I'm sure it'd open a can of worms.
--
Darkoil
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Don't try and tell me what I do and don't believe in and don't say we because we are nothing alike.
--
lufa
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
That's right, we're nothing alike, you're a self-proclaimed psychopath, I'm not.
Secondly 'scientific belief' is an oxymoron, there is no scientific basis for your subjective opinion that 'nobody on this planet matters.' So don't use the word 'science' in a sense when you have no idea what you're talking about.
I'm not telling you what you believe, you said it yourself and I said I agreed to an extent, dumbass.
But there is one thing we are alike, that we wouldn't care if a large fraction of the human population disappeared. So why are you contradicting yourself?
--
Darkoil
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Ok Mr Know-it-all.
Firstly I didn't proclaim to be a psychopath, if you read my first statement correctly you will see I was actually saying I don't think I am.
Secondly you are still trying to tell me what I do or don't believe in because your saying what I believe in is not scientific. My opinion may be just an opinion but I have come to my own conclusions due to studying different areas of science, mainly astrophysics, evolution and neurology. Due to the complex nature of what I actually believe in, it could never be proven but it is still a scientific belief. The big bang theory can never be proven but that also is still a scientific belief.
And in regards to me not knowing what I'm talking about, well I have multiple degrees in various areas of science including a postgraduate so I like to think I know a little bit about what I'm talking about.
--
lufa
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
"Firstly I didn't proclaim to be a psychopath, if you read my first statement correctly you will see I was actually saying I don't think I am."
Oh you mean this statement:
"I check nearly all the boxes which are required to be considered a psychopath"
Where you declare that you check all the boxes to be considered a psychopath, read "correctly" would mean the exact opposite of that? Talk about contradicting yourself.
Ya I'm in agreement with you, you definitely are a psychopath and given your self-contradicting nature, a schizophrenic.
If your 'belief' cannot be 'proven' then it is the opposite of science. You seem to have no clue what science involves. Both my undergrad and graduate degrees are in science and I can easily see through your bullshit.
The Big Bang theory is not a 'belief', which is the acceptance of a claim as fact without evidence. Rather it is a scientific hypothesis, which based on the evidence leads to the conclusion that our universe originated from the big bang.
You sound like too much of a dumbass to have even entered first year undergrad, let alone complete multiple degrees. So you're probably just lying or you got your degree by mail order.
--
Darkoil
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I don't know whether you are intentionally misreading my first sentence or you simply do not understand simple English, either way if you were to read it in its entirety you would see I am proclaiming the exact opposite.
I fucking hate it when people try and argue semantics to make their point. If the word belief goes directly against the grain of science then why in most scientific conclusions do the authors write 'we believe' even if their results are conclusive?
Just to clarify the big bang is a theory, not a hypothesis, for someone so into science I figured you would know the difference.
--
lufa
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
See More Comments =>
So let me get this straight, when you said "I check nearly all the boxes required to be considered a psychopath" you are saying that it means the opposite, that you're not a psychopath?
You're really fucking stupid or have some kind of mental illness for affirming something, then declaring you meant the exact opposite. I find it funny and ironic you're putting it back on me, when clearly you're the one with the serious comprehension problems.
If I "check all the boxes" for some disorder, that means I have that disorder you fucking retard. So keep trying to invert the meaning, people will read this and agree that you really are a moron.
There is no scientific basis in your 'belief'. You attached the word 'scientific' to try to sound more credible and add an air of legitimacy to nothing more than a subjective opinion.
If and when scientists claim 'we believe the universe started from the big bang' what that means is based on all the scientific evidence, it can be concluded it came from a big bang. Semantics do matter in this case, a subject you have no knowledge of, nor of science as it is self-evident.
For a person who alleges to have many science degrees, you seem to be utterly clueless on it's principles and definitions.
Again your lack of scientific education is starkly apparent-the big bang is a hypothesis as well as a theory. Now why don't you look up what both words mean so I don't have to keep schooling you and wasting my time?