I am a man, and I think what you are saying is justified. Even I hate men for being insensitive towards women. What you say about periods, giving birth, etc is absolutely true, and I, as a man, feel really bad and empathetic about the pain women go through. Most of the men are egotistic, you are right. I confess to you that I think about girls in a derogatory sexual way sometimes, but I feel very guilty afterwards. I hate myself for this aspect of mine. Anyway, I would advise you to love yourself so much that you don't need a man to make you happy. Please reply how you feel. All the best!!!
Throwing the male sex under the bus doesn't make you the last true "good" man.
Men are insensitive to women, are you crazy? If that's the case why is it that if a woman is being slapped on the street men will jump in to help but very rarely do the same for another man? I could then go into the topic of all the technology and equipment men have built specifically to help women, their periods, and when giving birth.
You don't know most men enough to say they're egotistical.
You think of women in a derogatory sexual way? If you mean that you just think of wond. Sexually and you're saying that's derogatory then wow, you're just a pathetic piece of work, and you aren't impressing anyone.
You're not the "better man" here, you're the pushover, self-loathing, willing to throw others under the bus to look good, type...Which if your aim is to impress women, from experience with the women I've had in my life, you're inhabiting all the worst traits to impress.
You say men have built technology, equipment, etc? The reason men have built these equipments is that women were discouraged to work in the previous century. Some of them are discouraged even now. Men expect women to compromise on their careers for family, motherhood, etc, which is the reason why there are so few women in top positions.
I don't mean that "sexual" is "derogatory".
Women have equal rights in America. But what about the rest of the world? Do you even know the condition of women in Muslim countries, and some underdeveloped countries in Africa?
Yes, maybe they "were" discouraged back then but it's certainly not the case today, and still men are mostly the ones in those fields. Still, men are the vast majority of builders, still men are the vast majority of sewage workers, etc, etc.
So yes, while discouraged from doing it back then they still have not participated as much as men in fields that need maintained to keep civilization fueled.
That said I'm not saying they should be obligated to do so or that it makes them lazy for not doing it, what I am saying is that if we are going to devalue men then the work men are more happy to do than women to keep our modern day lives fueled should and will be brought up.
Well if you think of women in a derogatory way then that's your flaw, don't project it on to the rest of us.
Yes I do, and I am fully in support of women being liberated from their metaphorical shackles from their treatment even if men and women in those cultures agree with the culture that subjects women to such treatment, everybody will agree there. That said, if you're going to try and use the issues of women in other countries to represent the lives of women in places like the US, UK, etc, then I'll be happy to tell you that you're using the suffering of those women to make a point for "women's issues" in places that women don't suffer from such issues.
IIN that I kind of just fucking hate men?
← View full post
I am a man, and I think what you are saying is justified. Even I hate men for being insensitive towards women. What you say about periods, giving birth, etc is absolutely true, and I, as a man, feel really bad and empathetic about the pain women go through. Most of the men are egotistic, you are right. I confess to you that I think about girls in a derogatory sexual way sometimes, but I feel very guilty afterwards. I hate myself for this aspect of mine. Anyway, I would advise you to love yourself so much that you don't need a man to make you happy. Please reply how you feel. All the best!!!
--
[Old Memory]
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Throwing the male sex under the bus doesn't make you the last true "good" man.
Men are insensitive to women, are you crazy? If that's the case why is it that if a woman is being slapped on the street men will jump in to help but very rarely do the same for another man? I could then go into the topic of all the technology and equipment men have built specifically to help women, their periods, and when giving birth.
You don't know most men enough to say they're egotistical.
You think of women in a derogatory sexual way? If you mean that you just think of wond. Sexually and you're saying that's derogatory then wow, you're just a pathetic piece of work, and you aren't impressing anyone.
You're not the "better man" here, you're the pushover, self-loathing, willing to throw others under the bus to look good, type...Which if your aim is to impress women, from experience with the women I've had in my life, you're inhabiting all the worst traits to impress.
--
aaaa1234
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
You say men have built technology, equipment, etc? The reason men have built these equipments is that women were discouraged to work in the previous century. Some of them are discouraged even now. Men expect women to compromise on their careers for family, motherhood, etc, which is the reason why there are so few women in top positions.
I don't mean that "sexual" is "derogatory".
Women have equal rights in America. But what about the rest of the world? Do you even know the condition of women in Muslim countries, and some underdeveloped countries in Africa?
--
[Old Memory]
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yes, maybe they "were" discouraged back then but it's certainly not the case today, and still men are mostly the ones in those fields. Still, men are the vast majority of builders, still men are the vast majority of sewage workers, etc, etc.
So yes, while discouraged from doing it back then they still have not participated as much as men in fields that need maintained to keep civilization fueled.
That said I'm not saying they should be obligated to do so or that it makes them lazy for not doing it, what I am saying is that if we are going to devalue men then the work men are more happy to do than women to keep our modern day lives fueled should and will be brought up.
Well if you think of women in a derogatory way then that's your flaw, don't project it on to the rest of us.
Yes I do, and I am fully in support of women being liberated from their metaphorical shackles from their treatment even if men and women in those cultures agree with the culture that subjects women to such treatment, everybody will agree there. That said, if you're going to try and use the issues of women in other countries to represent the lives of women in places like the US, UK, etc, then I'll be happy to tell you that you're using the suffering of those women to make a point for "women's issues" in places that women don't suffer from such issues.