I am so confused as to why this is the top comment when it contains stupid shit such as:
1. "Closet lesbian" reference. So according to your logic, men who like women with shorter hair must be closet gays.
2. The OP was called shallow. Everyone has preferences and I'm pretty sure there's something about your wife that drew you in and if given a choice, you would pick her over someone less attractive.
3. Idiotic stereotype at the end. The majority of long-haired men I've met are talented and humble musicians who mind their own business and are polite and respectful.
Mine was not a stereotype. If you had read my comment more carefully, you would have seen that I said, "The majority of long-haired men I'VE MET are...." Keywords are "I'VE MET." Thank you.
Irrelevant actually. They are both dumb stereo types, and being that the majority that you met were that certain way constitutes a stereo type....you retard. Thank you
I never said it didnt. I said it's irrelevant because your true life experience was that of a stereo type. Musicians and long hair being the most common one ever. Everything you just said is in agreement with me. I cant be wrong cause the point im making is the same one you are making without realising it. Stupid ass.
Is it normal that I have an extreme attraction to men with long hair?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I am so confused as to why this is the top comment when it contains stupid shit such as:
1. "Closet lesbian" reference. So according to your logic, men who like women with shorter hair must be closet gays.
2. The OP was called shallow. Everyone has preferences and I'm pretty sure there's something about your wife that drew you in and if given a choice, you would pick her over someone less attractive.
3. Idiotic stereotype at the end. The majority of long-haired men I've met are talented and humble musicians who mind their own business and are polite and respectful.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
Both comments are stupid stereo types. Most are neither......
unkempt (dirty/lazy) or just look like (and tend to act similarly) douchebags
and
talented and humble musicians who mind their own business and are polite and respectful.
--
VsegdaTemnata
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Mine was not a stereotype. If you had read my comment more carefully, you would have seen that I said, "The majority of long-haired men I'VE MET are...." Keywords are "I'VE MET." Thank you.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Irrelevant actually. They are both dumb stereo types, and being that the majority that you met were that certain way constitutes a stereo type....you retard. Thank you
--
VsegdaTemnata
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
No, it doesn't, it constitutes my true-life experiences. I'm sorry you can't admit you're wrong. Goodbye.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I never said it didnt. I said it's irrelevant because your true life experience was that of a stereo type. Musicians and long hair being the most common one ever. Everything you just said is in agreement with me. I cant be wrong cause the point im making is the same one you are making without realising it. Stupid ass.