Of course it's not normal. You ever hear a couple guys talking "damn, she's hot." "Yeah, she sure is....wish I could see her take a shit." No...no, you don't hear that among "normal" people. slightly more common are pissing fetishes, included in watersports as the kids call it. That's more of a BDSM thing though. Anyway, a fetish enjoyed by a small subset of the population is not considered normal.
After being around for 32 years you get a sense of what is typical among fellow humans and getting sexually aroused from watching a woman defecate is not on that list. How do you know people that fuck animals are a small portion of the population? How do you know that people who drink blood are a small portion of the population? It's common knowledge. I'm defining normal as something typical of a large percentage of the population. I'm not putting him down, I'm simply saying it's not "normal."
How about throwing sliced pears at a midget's genitalia while singing the Canadian national anthem? Would that be a judgmental biased opinion to say that's an uncommon fetish? Look, I'm not saying it's completely unheard of to enjoy scat porn. I am saying the majority of people do not find it sexually arousing to incorporate feces into their sex routine. If you are under the impression that this is somehow a closet fantasy held by a substantial portion of the population then you're wrong. I really don't have statistical data to show this. Like I said it's common sense. Just as I know it's not common to fuck the neck holes of decapitated chickens. That's an extreme example but it's based on the same knowledge of human behavior. I think maybe you're misunderstanding the use of the word normal. The definition is: conforming to a standard; usual, typical, or expected. Now, are you going to tell me that this is normal?
1) It's NOT common sense. Common sense would be to acknowledge the very real fact that YOU DON'T KNOW if the majority of the population do/not enjoy this fetish. So you can't make a judgment on it other than it being your own opinion.
Yours is a biased perspective. There's a difference.
2) There are many definitions of normal. If I were to go by your dictionary definition, then men who wear high heels would be ABnormal because that's not "usual, typical, or expected". But how can a preference of clothing be ABnormal? Just because one society says a man should wear particular clothing while others don't care?
Another definition would be "not mentally ill".
Yet another one is "behavior that is consistent with the most common behavior".
Finally, there are subjective/personal definitions such as my own: "If it harms no one and nothing, then it is normal".
I'm using my own.
If I were to use your dictionary definition, it is also "normal". It's "expected"/"typical"/commonly "usual" in many sexual escapades that someone might have a fetish. This fetish is just one of many. Whether or not a wide variety of people share it is irrelevant. It is still a fetish and many people have fetishes. That makes it normal (to me).
I can't say whether that particular fetish is ab/normal using your definition because--and this is rational logic--I DON'T KNOW how many people indulge in it.
So I'm not going to make a judgment on something I DON'T KNOW.
Every definition of normal but your own hurts your argument. That's neat by the way. We get to make up new definitions for existing words with established ones. "Your honor, that's not my definition of consensual sex." And by your logic eating a hamburger is not normal because it violates your definition by harming someone or something, in this case an animal. Let's get this straight. Using the example above, throwing sliced pears at a midgets dick while singing the Canadian national anthem. This is normal behavior because A) it's hurting no one and B) because I can't prove that a lot of people don't do this? Haha.
IIN that I have an efro/backdoor brown fetish?
← View full post
Of course it's not normal. You ever hear a couple guys talking "damn, she's hot." "Yeah, she sure is....wish I could see her take a shit." No...no, you don't hear that among "normal" people. slightly more common are pissing fetishes, included in watersports as the kids call it. That's more of a BDSM thing though. Anyway, a fetish enjoyed by a small subset of the population is not considered normal.
--
ArayaLioness
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
How do you know it's a small portion of the population?
--
Jweezee
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
After being around for 32 years you get a sense of what is typical among fellow humans and getting sexually aroused from watching a woman defecate is not on that list. How do you know people that fuck animals are a small portion of the population? How do you know that people who drink blood are a small portion of the population? It's common knowledge. I'm defining normal as something typical of a large percentage of the population. I'm not putting him down, I'm simply saying it's not "normal."
--
ArayaLioness
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
No. It's not common knowledge. Common sense dictates that fetishes that are not "generally accepted" among a certain society will not be spoken aloud.
My point is YOU DON'T KNOW if "a large percentage of the population" does this or not. So it's merely a biased judgmental opinion.
--
Jweezee
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
How about throwing sliced pears at a midget's genitalia while singing the Canadian national anthem? Would that be a judgmental biased opinion to say that's an uncommon fetish? Look, I'm not saying it's completely unheard of to enjoy scat porn. I am saying the majority of people do not find it sexually arousing to incorporate feces into their sex routine. If you are under the impression that this is somehow a closet fantasy held by a substantial portion of the population then you're wrong. I really don't have statistical data to show this. Like I said it's common sense. Just as I know it's not common to fuck the neck holes of decapitated chickens. That's an extreme example but it's based on the same knowledge of human behavior. I think maybe you're misunderstanding the use of the word normal. The definition is: conforming to a standard; usual, typical, or expected. Now, are you going to tell me that this is normal?
--
ArayaLioness
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
1) It's NOT common sense. Common sense would be to acknowledge the very real fact that YOU DON'T KNOW if the majority of the population do/not enjoy this fetish. So you can't make a judgment on it other than it being your own opinion.
Yours is a biased perspective. There's a difference.
2) There are many definitions of normal. If I were to go by your dictionary definition, then men who wear high heels would be ABnormal because that's not "usual, typical, or expected". But how can a preference of clothing be ABnormal? Just because one society says a man should wear particular clothing while others don't care?
Another definition would be "not mentally ill".
Yet another one is "behavior that is consistent with the most common behavior".
Finally, there are subjective/personal definitions such as my own: "If it harms no one and nothing, then it is normal".
I'm using my own.
If I were to use your dictionary definition, it is also "normal". It's "expected"/"typical"/commonly "usual" in many sexual escapades that someone might have a fetish. This fetish is just one of many. Whether or not a wide variety of people share it is irrelevant. It is still a fetish and many people have fetishes. That makes it normal (to me).
I can't say whether that particular fetish is ab/normal using your definition because--and this is rational logic--I DON'T KNOW how many people indulge in it.
So I'm not going to make a judgment on something I DON'T KNOW.
--
Jweezee
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
See More Comments =>
Every definition of normal but your own hurts your argument. That's neat by the way. We get to make up new definitions for existing words with established ones. "Your honor, that's not my definition of consensual sex." And by your logic eating a hamburger is not normal because it violates your definition by harming someone or something, in this case an animal. Let's get this straight. Using the example above, throwing sliced pears at a midgets dick while singing the Canadian national anthem. This is normal behavior because A) it's hurting no one and B) because I can't prove that a lot of people don't do this? Haha.