Two very separate things you are saying there. Saying men are superior doesn't mean you hate women, despite how much people believe that's what it means.
I believe men are superior, as a gender. They are the worst and the best at most things, women are almost always on the neautral area, they aren't usually the best or the worst at things.
I believe ever since women have had their rights, too many have made people see it as a "bad decision". I believe women should have rights, but the way a lot of women use those rights to just constantly pput down the male gender is appauling, especially given that they are using everthing made by males.
What irritates me is the irony of "equality". Men have done more, made more, invented more, and progressed civilization/society more, and yet they are to be seen as equal to the gender that still to this day does not contribute to the evolution of our civilization as much as males today. Sure, they do a lot more than they did before since they have their rights, and I'm greatful, but that doesn't mean they are doing equal amounts.
The whole equality idea is a joke. How is it equality to say that the group that has done more than the other is the same as the one that hasn't done as much? There is a difference between being treated equally and being equal, but sadly this society doesn't see the difference between the two.
Personally the argument of equality is about equal treatment and equal opportunity. If you and I are equally qualified for the same job we both have, we should be paid the same. If we applied to the same university, we should be judged by equal criteria. If we both fulfilled the same accomplishments, we should be respected equally. That, to me, should be applicable regardless of if its between different sexes, same sex, races, etc. I shouldn't get special treatment because my great-great grandmother got treated like crap by her husband (she didnt btw), and you shouldnt get special treatment for accomplishments that some other guy made. It should be about judging the individual, not the group.
I didn't think you were, but you said that the irony of equality irritates you. My response was simply a different perspective on what the equality is that most women look for (at least the not-psycho-feminist ones I've met). Whether or not one sex is "better" than the other is an interesting discussion, but a moot point in personal interactions, which is where the issue of equality is most prevalent.
Is it normal that I hate women?
← View full post
Two very separate things you are saying there. Saying men are superior doesn't mean you hate women, despite how much people believe that's what it means.
I believe men are superior, as a gender. They are the worst and the best at most things, women are almost always on the neautral area, they aren't usually the best or the worst at things.
I believe ever since women have had their rights, too many have made people see it as a "bad decision". I believe women should have rights, but the way a lot of women use those rights to just constantly pput down the male gender is appauling, especially given that they are using everthing made by males.
What irritates me is the irony of "equality". Men have done more, made more, invented more, and progressed civilization/society more, and yet they are to be seen as equal to the gender that still to this day does not contribute to the evolution of our civilization as much as males today. Sure, they do a lot more than they did before since they have their rights, and I'm greatful, but that doesn't mean they are doing equal amounts.
The whole equality idea is a joke. How is it equality to say that the group that has done more than the other is the same as the one that hasn't done as much? There is a difference between being treated equally and being equal, but sadly this society doesn't see the difference between the two.
--
tbiM20
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Personally the argument of equality is about equal treatment and equal opportunity. If you and I are equally qualified for the same job we both have, we should be paid the same. If we applied to the same university, we should be judged by equal criteria. If we both fulfilled the same accomplishments, we should be respected equally. That, to me, should be applicable regardless of if its between different sexes, same sex, races, etc. I shouldn't get special treatment because my great-great grandmother got treated like crap by her husband (she didnt btw), and you shouldnt get special treatment for accomplishments that some other guy made. It should be about judging the individual, not the group.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I never said the individual man should be respected, I do believe the gender as a group should be.
--
tbiM20
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I didn't think you were, but you said that the irony of equality irritates you. My response was simply a different perspective on what the equality is that most women look for (at least the not-psycho-feminist ones I've met). Whether or not one sex is "better" than the other is an interesting discussion, but a moot point in personal interactions, which is where the issue of equality is most prevalent.