People who dismember always get done through DNA evidence. Always "bits" of them in drains, hairs in your carpet, blood specks you missed.
"One hair and the cops are there"
But many people get buried in a remote location and never found again. And no evidence in your house connecting it to you, so even if they find it, no connection.
well, obviously you have to do things right. Hence the acids :) they help get rid of DNA in your "cleaning" part.
If you do the deed someplace else, a nice big plastic bag will prevent evidence from showing up any place except those said cleaning parts...
If you do the deed at home, you have the same problem if you bury them somewhere and need to prepare proper("don't mind the foil everywhere, i was going to paint this room.").
But of course you are right, in the end, it is a mere matter of preference ^_^ Whatever disposal method makes one feel more comfortable, right?
Digging a hole has worked for many, dismemberment has worked for few. It's all about cutting ties to yourself not getting rid of the body. The risk of being convicted is higher if you cut them up. I suppose it worked better 30 years ago when forensic science wasn't as advanced, but i wouldn't risk it these days. But if you have a boat you're set...ocean is fullproof.
hehe, yep, but for how many something works may actually work in your favor. If you do it proper, and i mean proper, it's just as save, but less likely-....
If i do it my way but regulary go to the woods with a pickup-truck and a shovel, maybe let someone see me dig a hole once, they'll focus on that and never can find anything... ^_^
If you are sufficiently careful and willing to go all the way with preparations and work required, doing something that worked for few, but doing it proper, may actually be the way to go-if they EXPECT you to do option A or option B, but assume that with option A you mess up somewhere, if they don't find something, they'll focus on option B instead(where there's no way to find anything, since you did option A PROPER). know what i mean?
As said, different things for different people- unfortunately no oceans around here -_- and rivers and lakes are unfortunately not as convenient as ocean dumps.
Is it normal that I hate eating in front of people?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
but it's an cost-efficient way to get rid of large parts of the corpses.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
No it's called a shovel.
--
TerryVie
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
nononono...a shovel leaves corpses...in the earth, sure, but it leaves them.
The right combination of eating, grinding+flushing, and dissolving in acids will _NOT_ leave a corpse.
Even if the party van shows up and does a torough check of your property, you can play it cool.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
People who dismember always get done through DNA evidence. Always "bits" of them in drains, hairs in your carpet, blood specks you missed.
"One hair and the cops are there"
But many people get buried in a remote location and never found again. And no evidence in your house connecting it to you, so even if they find it, no connection.
"In a hole, in control"
--
TerryVie
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
well, obviously you have to do things right. Hence the acids :) they help get rid of DNA in your "cleaning" part.
If you do the deed someplace else, a nice big plastic bag will prevent evidence from showing up any place except those said cleaning parts...
If you do the deed at home, you have the same problem if you bury them somewhere and need to prepare proper("don't mind the foil everywhere, i was going to paint this room.").
But of course you are right, in the end, it is a mere matter of preference ^_^ Whatever disposal method makes one feel more comfortable, right?
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Digging a hole has worked for many, dismemberment has worked for few. It's all about cutting ties to yourself not getting rid of the body. The risk of being convicted is higher if you cut them up. I suppose it worked better 30 years ago when forensic science wasn't as advanced, but i wouldn't risk it these days. But if you have a boat you're set...ocean is fullproof.
--
TerryVie
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
hehe, yep, but for how many something works may actually work in your favor. If you do it proper, and i mean proper, it's just as save, but less likely-....
If i do it my way but regulary go to the woods with a pickup-truck and a shovel, maybe let someone see me dig a hole once, they'll focus on that and never can find anything... ^_^
If you are sufficiently careful and willing to go all the way with preparations and work required, doing something that worked for few, but doing it proper, may actually be the way to go-if they EXPECT you to do option A or option B, but assume that with option A you mess up somewhere, if they don't find something, they'll focus on option B instead(where there's no way to find anything, since you did option A PROPER). know what i mean?
As said, different things for different people- unfortunately no oceans around here -_- and rivers and lakes are unfortunately not as convenient as ocean dumps.