Those people aren't representing feminism, they're representing female supremacism disguised as feminism. That's different, and it's understandable to find that ridiculous. You should have been more specific in your question, rather than targeting all male feminists.
I am sure that radical feminists also believe that they are "true" feminists and I am not here to decide who "real" feminists are. If those feminists and egalitarians don´t clearly distinguish themselves and form two completely separate groups, I don´t care to strictly distinguish between them either.
That's your prerogative, but to me that's just wilful ignorance. If you're not willing to distinguish between people claiming wrongfully to be something and those claiming rightly to be something then you have no right to be 'repulsed'.
Right to be repulsed? I have never heard such a bulshit. Something as stupid as this can be said only by a person who believes in feminist ideology. The problematics of "rights" poisoned your ability to think clearly.
BTW: All feminists would say that they claim rightly to be feminists - radical ones as well as the others. All those who label themselves "feminist" have to deal with the fact that they will be seen as a group. If egalitarians feel different they should strictly avoid the label "feminist".
If you are too lazy or apathetic to make the effort to understand feminism and thus be capable of differentiating between those claiming to be feminists who are, and those claiming to be feminists who aren't, then you can't justify having such a vehement reaction to ALL male feminists.
It's like hating all muslims because of the minority that blow themselves up in public places, or all women because your mother was a bitch, or all dogs because Droopy freaks you out, or all white people because you hate The Beatles.
It's funny, because your reaction seems pretty stupid for somebody dishing out the accusations of stupidity.
I've been thinking about leaving this conversation at that because you don't seem to understand what I wanted to say and I am not sure if it's worth trying further.
I am not lazy to differentiate between people. However, I find it ridiculous to quarel with a feminist (or so called "feminist") if he or she is "true" feminist or not. It is not so black-and-white as it seems from what you say. You seem to believe that there are "real" feminists (the good ones who believe in equality) and so called "feminists" who are not feminists in fact (the bad ones).
I find it difficult to believe in the existence of the "good" ones who want real equality between men and women since they seem to care only about one half of the problem. Why don't they care with equal enthusiasm about men's rights in the areas where men are discriminated? When men are discriminated our society with all those "good" feminists is totally silent! What equality are you talking about then?
"...as a woman"? Wow, so you are a sexist, then...
By the way, I strongly recommend you to try a few reading comprehension tests in English, let´s say pre-intermediate level, if your success rate is higher than 25%, you can start to believe in supernatural phenomena because it would be a sufficient proof of the existence of miracles.
You made it all the way to pre-intermediate? Wow. What a mental giant. You wouldn't know it. Must be that you really dumb down your writing for the rest of us bugs who must crawl in the shadow of your giant intellect...
I am especially impressed by your dual perspectives: the way you pretend to be both a woman OP and a male respondent.
You don't understand at all what I wrote in my comment(s). I don't think that there is anything wrong with the word "repulsed". What I find absurd is the "right to be repulsed". However, I realize that you may not understand what the problem is with the expression because it's too abstract for your stupid mind to process such complex words.
As I know from IIN, I am not the only person who thinks that you are totally retarded and can't understand anything what other people write because you completely lack abstract thinking and ability to understand terms and contextual cues. The latest responses you got from other users speak for themselves: 3 out of 3 users think that you lack logic, abstract thinking and basic comprehension. So shut up and don't talk to anyone who has at least one neuron for logic or abstract thinking!
BTW: I am complimented if such a retard as you are thinks something bad about me so thanks for saying how full of shit I am as a woman.
Is it normal that I find men who hold feminist beliefs repulsive?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Those people aren't representing feminism, they're representing female supremacism disguised as feminism. That's different, and it's understandable to find that ridiculous. You should have been more specific in your question, rather than targeting all male feminists.
--
Anonymous Post Author
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-2
-2
I am sure that radical feminists also believe that they are "true" feminists and I am not here to decide who "real" feminists are. If those feminists and egalitarians don´t clearly distinguish themselves and form two completely separate groups, I don´t care to strictly distinguish between them either.
--
disthing
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
3
3
-
[Old Memory]
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
That's your prerogative, but to me that's just wilful ignorance. If you're not willing to distinguish between people claiming wrongfully to be something and those claiming rightly to be something then you have no right to be 'repulsed'.
--
Anonymous Post Author
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-4
-4
Right to be repulsed? I have never heard such a bulshit. Something as stupid as this can be said only by a person who believes in feminist ideology. The problematics of "rights" poisoned your ability to think clearly.
BTW: All feminists would say that they claim rightly to be feminists - radical ones as well as the others. All those who label themselves "feminist" have to deal with the fact that they will be seen as a group. If egalitarians feel different they should strictly avoid the label "feminist".
--
disthing
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
3
3
-
Mando
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
3
3
If you are too lazy or apathetic to make the effort to understand feminism and thus be capable of differentiating between those claiming to be feminists who are, and those claiming to be feminists who aren't, then you can't justify having such a vehement reaction to ALL male feminists.
It's like hating all muslims because of the minority that blow themselves up in public places, or all women because your mother was a bitch, or all dogs because Droopy freaks you out, or all white people because you hate The Beatles.
It's funny, because your reaction seems pretty stupid for somebody dishing out the accusations of stupidity.
--
Anonymous Post Author
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-2
-2
I've been thinking about leaving this conversation at that because you don't seem to understand what I wanted to say and I am not sure if it's worth trying further.
I am not lazy to differentiate between people. However, I find it ridiculous to quarel with a feminist (or so called "feminist") if he or she is "true" feminist or not. It is not so black-and-white as it seems from what you say. You seem to believe that there are "real" feminists (the good ones who believe in equality) and so called "feminists" who are not feminists in fact (the bad ones).
I find it difficult to believe in the existence of the "good" ones who want real equality between men and women since they seem to care only about one half of the problem. Why don't they care with equal enthusiasm about men's rights in the areas where men are discriminated? When men are discriminated our society with all those "good" feminists is totally silent! What equality are you talking about then?
Repulsed is your word. I can't believe how full of shit you are as a woman.
--
Mando
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
-
prasatko
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-2
-2
-
Anonymous Post Author
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-2
-2
Sorry. I thought I'd edited that. I meant full of baloney.
"...as a woman"? Wow, so you are a sexist, then...
By the way, I strongly recommend you to try a few reading comprehension tests in English, let´s say pre-intermediate level, if your success rate is higher than 25%, you can start to believe in supernatural phenomena because it would be a sufficient proof of the existence of miracles.
--
Mando
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
See More Comments =>
You made it all the way to pre-intermediate? Wow. What a mental giant. You wouldn't know it. Must be that you really dumb down your writing for the rest of us bugs who must crawl in the shadow of your giant intellect...
I am especially impressed by your dual perspectives: the way you pretend to be both a woman OP and a male respondent.
You don't understand at all what I wrote in my comment(s). I don't think that there is anything wrong with the word "repulsed". What I find absurd is the "right to be repulsed". However, I realize that you may not understand what the problem is with the expression because it's too abstract for your stupid mind to process such complex words.
As I know from IIN, I am not the only person who thinks that you are totally retarded and can't understand anything what other people write because you completely lack abstract thinking and ability to understand terms and contextual cues. The latest responses you got from other users speak for themselves: 3 out of 3 users think that you lack logic, abstract thinking and basic comprehension. So shut up and don't talk to anyone who has at least one neuron for logic or abstract thinking!
BTW: I am complimented if such a retard as you are thinks something bad about me so thanks for saying how full of shit I am as a woman.
--
Anonymous Post Author
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Note: Referring to the reactions of other users to your comments I mean your comments in the last 30 hours or so before I wrote my previous comment.
if the terrible twins speak as one?