It is allowable to replicate non-living body parts (Epidermis, hair, teeth and fingernails/ toenails).
Now think of the inverse. If it is not Ethical to replicate body parts, is it Ethical to remove substances from our body that are unwanted or dangerous to us (viruses, bacteria, toxins, ink)? The answer is ABSOLUTELY, YES!
To be con'd...
Wbat will this mean? People will take the attitude that, I can get a tattoo and have it removed if and when I want. What will happen, is that tattooing will become much like graffiti. Yes, sometimes it can be viewed as a form of art, or even convey important historical information. But it also tends to cause fads and when there is too much of it, it becomes ugly.
To be con'd...
Now, I can already hear a bunch of people jumping up and down, that every tattoo parlour, and every tattoo artist will be put out of business!
"Body Art" is important for SOME people, such as yourself.
To be cont'd...
The guidelines are as follows:
"Body Art", should be used sparingly to moderately and should be tasteful.
Persons who want to have "Body Art" will often use a 'professional' artist, sometimes at a "Body Art Studio".
Only water-based, non-toxic, non-allergenic (FDA type approved) paints should be used.
Many people will say this is only temporary, and will come off the next time I wash.
What we need is a new technology that can quickly and accurately replicate the artist's design. It would be much like putting on your make-up, only quicker.
Yeah I really dont even feel like replying to this. You spammed my page with your argument rather than putting it in a single, easy to read format, not to mentioned BSed a long ass paragraph to get to your point. I simply dont have the time or the patience to respond to all that, sorry :P Interesting argument though, but I still have my own ideas.
Yes, you and your greedy, self-centered ideas (many of which have been perpetuated for thousands of years) are quickly bringing ALL LIFE ON THIS PLANET EARTH, to an abrupt end! It took us millions of years to get here, but you don't have less than an hour to save your own ass, and everyone else's!
I dont have less than an hour to debate with someone whos rambling on like a doomsdayer. Please stop spamming my post, no one likes spam. Good day sir or madam.
I have just been informed:
Many people have thought that they will get a tattoo because they now know that they can have it easily removed in the future. This will not happen. It will not be allowed.
If you choose to mark yourself as an Ethically inferior Creature, you do this at your own peril.
Please also keep in mind that the Creatures I have spoken about have extended their lifespans ten-fold.
Is it normal that I dont have conventional ideas about what slutty is?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
It is allowable to replicate non-living body parts (Epidermis, hair, teeth and fingernails/ toenails).
Now think of the inverse. If it is not Ethical to replicate body parts, is it Ethical to remove substances from our body that are unwanted or dangerous to us (viruses, bacteria, toxins, ink)? The answer is ABSOLUTELY, YES!
To be con'd...
--
suckonthis9
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Wbat will this mean? People will take the attitude that, I can get a tattoo and have it removed if and when I want. What will happen, is that tattooing will become much like graffiti. Yes, sometimes it can be viewed as a form of art, or even convey important historical information. But it also tends to cause fads and when there is too much of it, it becomes ugly.
To be con'd...
--
suckonthis9
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Now, I can already hear a bunch of people jumping up and down, that every tattoo parlour, and every tattoo artist will be put out of business!
"Body Art" is important for SOME people, such as yourself.
To be cont'd...
--
suckonthis9
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
The guidelines are as follows:
"Body Art", should be used sparingly to moderately and should be tasteful.
Persons who want to have "Body Art" will often use a 'professional' artist, sometimes at a "Body Art Studio".
Only water-based, non-toxic, non-allergenic (FDA type approved) paints should be used.
Many people will say this is only temporary, and will come off the next time I wash.
What we need is a new technology that can quickly and accurately replicate the artist's design. It would be much like putting on your make-up, only quicker.
--
shade_ilmaendu
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
suckonthis9
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yeah I really dont even feel like replying to this. You spammed my page with your argument rather than putting it in a single, easy to read format, not to mentioned BSed a long ass paragraph to get to your point. I simply dont have the time or the patience to respond to all that, sorry :P Interesting argument though, but I still have my own ideas.
--
suckonthis9
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yes, you and your greedy, self-centered ideas (many of which have been perpetuated for thousands of years) are quickly bringing ALL LIFE ON THIS PLANET EARTH, to an abrupt end! It took us millions of years to get here, but you don't have less than an hour to save your own ass, and everyone else's!
--
shade_ilmaendu
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
I dont have less than an hour to debate with someone whos rambling on like a doomsdayer. Please stop spamming my post, no one likes spam. Good day sir or madam.
I have just been informed:
Many people have thought that they will get a tattoo because they now know that they can have it easily removed in the future. This will not happen. It will not be allowed.
If you choose to mark yourself as an Ethically inferior Creature, you do this at your own peril.
Please also keep in mind that the Creatures I have spoken about have extended their lifespans ten-fold.