Oh yeah as for saying a women can say no or insist on him wearing protection and it pains me to say this but ur right, but can't a man say no as well and insist on protection. How about some balance here.
Oh, my apologies, princess. How dare someone have the "audacity" to judge you, when you are judging people as sexist. How dare someone not stick to the princess double standard you have of "I can judge you, but how dare you judge me". Get over yourself. I can judge whoever I want, whenever I want, just as you are free to do the same with me, which you have done, numerous times now.
I don't need to know you personally to know how you would react in a certain topic. You have communicated with me, and I have seen you comment on here enough to base my opinion on you.
You are free to judge me all you want, and just like my judgements, they can be right or wrong. yours, undoubtably, is wrong. As a matter of fact, I have stopped commenting and replying to users in general on here as much as I used to. Most reactions nowadays on here make me think "why bother", and don't reply, not "Oh, goody, someone replied to me."
If you are going to judge me, do it correctly.
yes, sometimes I see reaction, but not a reaction for the sake of reaction, but reaction in the sake of rational debate, which has, like I already implied, has let me down, and so I don't engage as much as I used to.
As a matter of fact, you have given me the opposite of what I want, yet everything I expected. I wanted you to reply to my example, and prove me wrong if you could. What I got? An emotional filled response simply because you lack the rationality to respond to the actual example, implying I'm wrong and sexist for it simply because you don't like what you hear, not because it is wrong, and if it is because I am wrong, explain why I am wrong.
Do you think I "want" this type of reaction from people? I spend time trying to make a rational point, making an example, going through every step of the example so it is easier to understand and see where I am coming from, just to, yet again, have a female get emotional over it simply because they can't reply to why I am wrong.
Yes, I totally waste my time trying to explain everything in depth just for reactions like yours. You are so right. I completely go in to depth rationally to why I am right just for someone, you in this example, to react with emotional drivle that does not answer the actual reply at all to what they were replying to. Yes, I seek such reactions. -Sigh-
You judged me, you judged wrong. Feel free to try again.
So hold on. You just sat there and said I was sexist, then say I am right. Were is the rationality there?
The simple difference is that it's "her" body that goes the changes, and so "she" should look after "her" body. Like I said, you are implying that women are unable to look after their bodies by themselves and need the help of men to look after their bodies, and how can anyone say the female gender is equal to the male gender when you think things like that?
Like the example explained:
It is in the customer's control to take the risks of ordering something that may have the chance of having what they are alregic to in their food, not the cooks. The customer is in control of it, if she orders it, she suffers the concequences of her bodyily health.
It is in the female's control to take the risks of engaging in something (sex) that may have the chance of "her" body going through changes, not the male's. She's in control of it, if she wants to engage in non-safe sex, then she suffers the concequences of her bodily health.
Until males have just as much choice as females, females deserve to take full responsibility of their bodies.
Like said before, you can't use the excuse "it's my body, so I get 100% choice", yet think the reason "It's your body, so it's 100% your responsibility".
You can't have your cake and eat it, too.
I am not looking for an emotional response, I want a rational one that stays on topic. I don't care for your feelings anymore than I expect you to care for mine, I care about the topic, so save the emotional response, state the parts you dissagree with, then explain why you dissagree with them and why they are wrong. If you are unable to do those things, then what is the point in replying to me?
Well seeing as in ur view if a women gets pregant then it is her job to 100% protect herself and the man takes little of no responsibility, if it was the other way around and men got pregnant and carried the babies would it be their (men's) responsibility to 100% protect themselves. Absolutly there's no argument that we are all responsibility and need to take ownership for our own bodies. Just because I said that you were right (about women taking responsibility for their bodies) that does not mean that I think my views opinions and thoughts are wrong just as you believe in ur thoughts and opinions. I obviously chose my user name because I believe in what I say. I suppose it's healthy and natural to disagree on things (sometimes)though as if we all had the same view on life the world wouldn't turn and it would certainly be a boring world.
My view of women is that either you get 50% choice and 50% responsibility, or have 100% choice and 100% responsibility. I am saying that they can't have both. Even though it should be a woman's responsibility to look after their own bodies, I know asking such a thing is asking too much of females. Like I said, you can't have your cake and eat it, too. You either have equal responsibility and choice, or you have complete choice with complete responsibility. You don't get to cut the best bits of the cake, then leave others to the bad parts.
Yes. If men got pregnant, then if they were to say they want 100% choice, they should have 100% responsibility. I agree completely. Although, I doubt that would happen if males fell pregnant. Society fucks the average man, so I strongly believe that men would be "forced" to give women equal choice in pregnancy.
I agree, it is healthy to disagree, although I expect an explanation as to why. It expands my knowledge if I'm wrong, and it expands your knowledge if you're wrong. You will not believe how many times I have changed my opinion on many things because people have proven me wrong. For example, I used to be a feminist.
Is it normal that i desire to have a baby boy at 19?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Oh yeah as for saying a women can say no or insist on him wearing protection and it pains me to say this but ur right, but can't a man say no as well and insist on protection. How about some balance here.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Oh, my apologies, princess. How dare someone have the "audacity" to judge you, when you are judging people as sexist. How dare someone not stick to the princess double standard you have of "I can judge you, but how dare you judge me". Get over yourself. I can judge whoever I want, whenever I want, just as you are free to do the same with me, which you have done, numerous times now.
I don't need to know you personally to know how you would react in a certain topic. You have communicated with me, and I have seen you comment on here enough to base my opinion on you.
You are free to judge me all you want, and just like my judgements, they can be right or wrong. yours, undoubtably, is wrong. As a matter of fact, I have stopped commenting and replying to users in general on here as much as I used to. Most reactions nowadays on here make me think "why bother", and don't reply, not "Oh, goody, someone replied to me."
If you are going to judge me, do it correctly.
yes, sometimes I see reaction, but not a reaction for the sake of reaction, but reaction in the sake of rational debate, which has, like I already implied, has let me down, and so I don't engage as much as I used to.
As a matter of fact, you have given me the opposite of what I want, yet everything I expected. I wanted you to reply to my example, and prove me wrong if you could. What I got? An emotional filled response simply because you lack the rationality to respond to the actual example, implying I'm wrong and sexist for it simply because you don't like what you hear, not because it is wrong, and if it is because I am wrong, explain why I am wrong.
Do you think I "want" this type of reaction from people? I spend time trying to make a rational point, making an example, going through every step of the example so it is easier to understand and see where I am coming from, just to, yet again, have a female get emotional over it simply because they can't reply to why I am wrong.
Yes, I totally waste my time trying to explain everything in depth just for reactions like yours. You are so right. I completely go in to depth rationally to why I am right just for someone, you in this example, to react with emotional drivle that does not answer the actual reply at all to what they were replying to. Yes, I seek such reactions. -Sigh-
You judged me, you judged wrong. Feel free to try again.
So hold on. You just sat there and said I was sexist, then say I am right. Were is the rationality there?
The simple difference is that it's "her" body that goes the changes, and so "she" should look after "her" body. Like I said, you are implying that women are unable to look after their bodies by themselves and need the help of men to look after their bodies, and how can anyone say the female gender is equal to the male gender when you think things like that?
Like the example explained:
It is in the customer's control to take the risks of ordering something that may have the chance of having what they are alregic to in their food, not the cooks. The customer is in control of it, if she orders it, she suffers the concequences of her bodyily health.
It is in the female's control to take the risks of engaging in something (sex) that may have the chance of "her" body going through changes, not the male's. She's in control of it, if she wants to engage in non-safe sex, then she suffers the concequences of her bodily health.
Until males have just as much choice as females, females deserve to take full responsibility of their bodies.
Like said before, you can't use the excuse "it's my body, so I get 100% choice", yet think the reason "It's your body, so it's 100% your responsibility".
You can't have your cake and eat it, too.
I am not looking for an emotional response, I want a rational one that stays on topic. I don't care for your feelings anymore than I expect you to care for mine, I care about the topic, so save the emotional response, state the parts you dissagree with, then explain why you dissagree with them and why they are wrong. If you are unable to do those things, then what is the point in replying to me?
--
Ibelievethis
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Well seeing as in ur view if a women gets pregant then it is her job to 100% protect herself and the man takes little of no responsibility, if it was the other way around and men got pregnant and carried the babies would it be their (men's) responsibility to 100% protect themselves. Absolutly there's no argument that we are all responsibility and need to take ownership for our own bodies. Just because I said that you were right (about women taking responsibility for their bodies) that does not mean that I think my views opinions and thoughts are wrong just as you believe in ur thoughts and opinions. I obviously chose my user name because I believe in what I say. I suppose it's healthy and natural to disagree on things (sometimes)though as if we all had the same view on life the world wouldn't turn and it would certainly be a boring world.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
My view of women is that either you get 50% choice and 50% responsibility, or have 100% choice and 100% responsibility. I am saying that they can't have both. Even though it should be a woman's responsibility to look after their own bodies, I know asking such a thing is asking too much of females. Like I said, you can't have your cake and eat it, too. You either have equal responsibility and choice, or you have complete choice with complete responsibility. You don't get to cut the best bits of the cake, then leave others to the bad parts.
Yes. If men got pregnant, then if they were to say they want 100% choice, they should have 100% responsibility. I agree completely. Although, I doubt that would happen if males fell pregnant. Society fucks the average man, so I strongly believe that men would be "forced" to give women equal choice in pregnancy.
I agree, it is healthy to disagree, although I expect an explanation as to why. It expands my knowledge if I'm wrong, and it expands your knowledge if you're wrong. You will not believe how many times I have changed my opinion on many things because people have proven me wrong. For example, I used to be a feminist.