It's not about "convincing." It's about rational arguments formed on convergent, rigorous, objective evidence over long stretches of time, made in different research settings the globe over. The tobacco industry wasn't "convinced" by the weight of the amassing medical evidence linking tobacco smoke with lung cancer, either. But that's exactly why empiricism is humanity's best means of discerning what's true. The overwhelming biomedical, anthropological, and historical evidence supports the evolutionary model of homosexuality as a natural variation, not just of human behavior, but of animal behavior across the animal kingdom.
You're welcome to your perspective. Just don't be surprised that very many, including very many of the planet's brightest minds, disagree with you.
Is it normal that I can't stand age restrictions?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
It's not about "convincing." It's about rational arguments formed on convergent, rigorous, objective evidence over long stretches of time, made in different research settings the globe over. The tobacco industry wasn't "convinced" by the weight of the amassing medical evidence linking tobacco smoke with lung cancer, either. But that's exactly why empiricism is humanity's best means of discerning what's true. The overwhelming biomedical, anthropological, and historical evidence supports the evolutionary model of homosexuality as a natural variation, not just of human behavior, but of animal behavior across the animal kingdom.
You're welcome to your perspective. Just don't be surprised that very many, including very many of the planet's brightest minds, disagree with you.