-
I don't think we should even think about limits like that until we are doing everything we can to lower the birth rate among those who cannot provide for their children. As a society we aren't taking care of the easy things yet, so until we are there I think the hard things aren't worth tackling.
I do think one good change would be making anyone who has their children in state custody pay child support or be put in jail. That way the true loser mothers that have keep having kids put into custody wouldn't be able to keep having kids due to their imprisonment.
Comment Hidden ( show )-
-
-
-
-
-
That would be covered by the mothers that do pay child support to the state. Also the prevention of new uncared for children would be far cheaper in the long run to the state. Especially considering the amount of state wards that end up in the prison system anyway.
Unless you mean we should execute the mothers. I feel that would rob us of the chance to try to redeem that person and I don't feel the punishment would fit the crime. It doesn't past the smell test for basic fairness to me.
Comment Hidden ( show )
-
-
-
-
-
SOME groups of people should be limited to one or no children, while others be allowed to have as many as they want.
The world is NOT overcrowded; the population is just unbalanced.
e.g. Chinese shouldn't breed like rabbits because there's no space for them in their own country, while Whites should be encouraged to have more children because they're only 10% of the world population.
Comment Hidden ( show ) -
Your poll options are a bit black and white there. Uncontrolled population growth is currently a bad thing, but a two-child limit also doesn't work. Too low of a birth rate harms both the economy and society as a whole. I've explained that in a previous post, and I'm on mobile so finding it would be a pain.
If you're the poster of the previous poll, you probably already have my opinion though.
Comment Hidden ( show ) -
-
-
-
[Old Memory]
-
-