Again, parent's make the decision, as, by law, the child has no say until eighteen years of age. You're not forced to give your son a circumcision. They only recommend you do so, for hygenic purposes. Ask your doctor.
So it is forced. Its not shots that are nescarry for school and it is done without numbing the child. Shots are not cutting off anything ot into anything so its not surgical. If you notice most surgical procedure is using medication to keep the person asleep or if awake they are made to feel numb. So why should it not apply here?
Because anesthesia is a lot of guesswork based on body size and suspected tolerances. The difficulty goes up exponentially with a tiny child. More often than not, the child will die. By removing that option, the parents go from probably not losing their child to taking their child home today.
If thats the case i think they need to wait a few years till they can numb the person. I mean looking at history its barbaric since in old days the quikest surgen cut off a limb in the shortest amount of time. Is it so hard to wait?
Is it normal that I am against child mutilation?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Again, parent's make the decision, as, by law, the child has no say until eighteen years of age. You're not forced to give your son a circumcision. They only recommend you do so, for hygenic purposes. Ask your doctor.
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
So it is forced. Its not shots that are nescarry for school and it is done without numbing the child. Shots are not cutting off anything ot into anything so its not surgical. If you notice most surgical procedure is using medication to keep the person asleep or if awake they are made to feel numb. So why should it not apply here?
--
Wüstenfuchs
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Because anesthesia is a lot of guesswork based on body size and suspected tolerances. The difficulty goes up exponentially with a tiny child. More often than not, the child will die. By removing that option, the parents go from probably not losing their child to taking their child home today.
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
If thats the case i think they need to wait a few years till they can numb the person. I mean looking at history its barbaric since in old days the quikest surgen cut off a limb in the shortest amount of time. Is it so hard to wait?