Nope, I’m going off your subtext and other comments you have posted on this website. If you’re ashamed to personally admit your point that’s fine, but there are plenty of others from your school of thinking who are more forthcoming.
I believe it means exactly what it’s defined as - looking and acting like a female. You can google the biological attributes and behaviors that generally differentiate a female human from a male human if you aren’t sure.
I can certainly google with the best of them, but I'm much more interested in what you believe the "biological attributes and behaviors that generally differentiate a female human from a male human" happen to be.
Can you give me some examples? If you are unwilling or unable, I would recommend doing some serious reflection as to why.
Why I don’t want to give you the definition of a word? Because I’m not a dictionary. I believe it means what it means.
But I will play along. Examples: Women have smaller and softer features than men. I doubt you are unable to find a woman feminine just because she doesn’t shave in the wintertime - how would you even know if it’s under her clothing? And assuming you are talking about in bed - do you really think you wouldn’t be able to get it up for an attractive woman just because she has pit hair?
I honestly feel terrible for modern women like yourself, with feminimity as demonized as it is, that you are either too ashamed or too unaware of what it actually means to be feminine that you can't even type it out. You either honestly don't know or you think I'll somehow "win" if you describe what it is. I'm not sure which is worse.
That you can't or won't describe what feminine appearance and behavior is, is an absolute tragedy that all of Western civilization is suffering from. For any girl reading this exchange, I'd encourage you to seek your own definition and not to be ashamed of it, no matter what the rabid feminists would have you believe.
Do so and you will find more confidence and happiness than you can imagine. As for you, duft, I'll let you have the last word. I think this conversation has run its course.
Hmm? But it’s both rabid feminists and you rabid anti feminists (the latter which are more prevalent these days) going at each other which has made being female shameful in the West. On the opposite end of “rabid feminists” we have things like incels trying to convince everyone women are shit.
I gave you my full requirements for being female. If you would like the conservative definition of your particular society and place in time, I can also give that. But personally the whole climate of society these days makes it pointless to associate with the gender stereotypes you’re picturing, unless you are an extremist and trying to attract the same.
Duft, I know it's impolite to mention these days, but a significant number of "rabid feminists" are man-hating lesbians. Many are angry that men are taller and physically stronger. And we're hairier. Many of those who work the hardest to punish ALL men are not romantic lesbians, but political lesbians which is a very strange social construct.
Yeah, it is pretty weird. Similarly I think their counter part the incels (like the guy I was replying to) are just self-hating gays (politically straight wannabe conservatives, but romantically gay)
"... men are taller and physically stronger. And we're hairier"
Why does it bother you then, if a woman doesn't shave? She will never be as hairy as a man. If it is down to preference then just don't date her. Otherwise you're the one being political about it.
Busby, when you take a discussion to playing word games, you've lost the argument. Shabby. Someone is unwilling or unable to follow you down a rabbit hole? You might be able to shout someone down, but you're not good enough at this to make it work in transcript discussion. The question then is is it you or is it your argument that's weak.
It's hard for me to remember my train of thought from a conversation this far back. I believe I was trying to get duft to explain to me what feminimity was. I wanted to know if we were working with the same definition, as otherwise our discussion would get nowhere. I couldn't get her to tell me.
I don't recall any shouting or rabit holes. If there's any point to take away from this it's that feminists don't seem want to define what femininity is. Or at least this one doesn't. Why do you think that is?
Is it normal that I’m not onboard with this whole januhairy thing?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Nope, I’m going off your subtext and other comments you have posted on this website. If you’re ashamed to personally admit your point that’s fine, but there are plenty of others from your school of thinking who are more forthcoming.
I believe it means exactly what it’s defined as - looking and acting like a female. You can google the biological attributes and behaviors that generally differentiate a female human from a male human if you aren’t sure.
So you think women are naturally masculine then?
--
bubsy
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I can certainly google with the best of them, but I'm much more interested in what you believe the "biological attributes and behaviors that generally differentiate a female human from a male human" happen to be.
Can you give me some examples? If you are unwilling or unable, I would recommend doing some serious reflection as to why.
--
mauzi
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
bornaman
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Why I don’t want to give you the definition of a word? Because I’m not a dictionary. I believe it means what it means.
But I will play along. Examples: Women have smaller and softer features than men. I doubt you are unable to find a woman feminine just because she doesn’t shave in the wintertime - how would you even know if it’s under her clothing? And assuming you are talking about in bed - do you really think you wouldn’t be able to get it up for an attractive woman just because she has pit hair?
--
bubsy
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
I honestly feel terrible for modern women like yourself, with feminimity as demonized as it is, that you are either too ashamed or too unaware of what it actually means to be feminine that you can't even type it out. You either honestly don't know or you think I'll somehow "win" if you describe what it is. I'm not sure which is worse.
That you can't or won't describe what feminine appearance and behavior is, is an absolute tragedy that all of Western civilization is suffering from. For any girl reading this exchange, I'd encourage you to seek your own definition and not to be ashamed of it, no matter what the rabid feminists would have you believe.
Do so and you will find more confidence and happiness than you can imagine. As for you, duft, I'll let you have the last word. I think this conversation has run its course.
--
mauzi
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Hmm? But it’s both rabid feminists and you rabid anti feminists (the latter which are more prevalent these days) going at each other which has made being female shameful in the West. On the opposite end of “rabid feminists” we have things like incels trying to convince everyone women are shit.
I gave you my full requirements for being female. If you would like the conservative definition of your particular society and place in time, I can also give that. But personally the whole climate of society these days makes it pointless to associate with the gender stereotypes you’re picturing, unless you are an extremist and trying to attract the same.
--
bornaman
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Duft, I know it's impolite to mention these days, but a significant number of "rabid feminists" are man-hating lesbians. Many are angry that men are taller and physically stronger. And we're hairier. Many of those who work the hardest to punish ALL men are not romantic lesbians, but political lesbians which is a very strange social construct.
--
mauzi
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yeah, it is pretty weird. Similarly I think their counter part the incels (like the guy I was replying to) are just self-hating gays (politically straight wannabe conservatives, but romantically gay)
"... men are taller and physically stronger. And we're hairier"
Why does it bother you then, if a woman doesn't shave? She will never be as hairy as a man. If it is down to preference then just don't date her. Otherwise you're the one being political about it.
Busby, when you take a discussion to playing word games, you've lost the argument. Shabby. Someone is unwilling or unable to follow you down a rabbit hole? You might be able to shout someone down, but you're not good enough at this to make it work in transcript discussion. The question then is is it you or is it your argument that's weak.
--
bubsy
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
It's hard for me to remember my train of thought from a conversation this far back. I believe I was trying to get duft to explain to me what feminimity was. I wanted to know if we were working with the same definition, as otherwise our discussion would get nowhere. I couldn't get her to tell me.
I don't recall any shouting or rabit holes. If there's any point to take away from this it's that feminists don't seem want to define what femininity is. Or at least this one doesn't. Why do you think that is?