IIN that girls seem to want either your; dick, brain, balls or money?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

← View full post
Comments ( 17 ) Sort: best | oldest
  • So if they want your brain, surely they’re wanting to have these amazingly deep conversations you’re obviously amazing at? Or maybe you’re just trying to find excuses for the fact you wanna bang dudes, it’s okay, it’s 2020, we accept you.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • It’s one of those rare times I agree with you my_life, so many “straight” men are so obviously repulsed by women that they should just come out already. It’s 2020, no-one cares that you like strong masculine arms, hairy chests and meaty cocks. Stop living in denial.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
    • If a woman were to want my brain, surely she would want to use it for the purposes I possess the prerogative of...

      Hmmmm. No.

      As for wanting to "bang dudes", no where in this article did I detail anything about how I feel about males.

      As such, let's not scapegoat my disappointment with the current female specimen with an alternative that simply doesn't address the discontent.

      This is a discussion about how women are failing to be humans.

      Not how "hairy chests and meaty cocks" as you put it are the sole replacement for a failed female populus.

      Lastly, males that take care of their hygiene far better than females do (typically trans or gays (completely hairless and far more beautiful than females despite not being able to know they in fact have penises) are very much on my radar.

      It's just sad that fat, bloated, retarded women believe that their rancid pussies are still hot commodity long after the world and science has revealed that males are in fact inherently far more beautiful then females.

      So I'm just beating the drum here and telling females to step up and dispense of the notion that they're necessary for the future, because with their current track record. They're not.

      Prove me wrong hags.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • When I wrote my earlier comment, I did not in fact realise that you are mentally retarded. I know it’s wrong to insult a retard so I’d now like to apologise for my earlier comment.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • I did not, in fact, realize*-

          Please, if you're going to criticize me via keystroke, at least make an effort to demonstrate your superior intelligence here.

          Gracias.

          Bye, Loser. ^^

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • Since you want to play grammar and punctuation Nazi:

            'As for wanting to "bang dudes", no where in this article...'

            Nowhere is a single word.

            'As such, let's not scapegoat my disappointment with the current female specimen with an alternative that simply doesn't address the discontent.'

            This sentence is a mess, and your use of "scapegoat" makes it gibberish. The only way it makes some sense is if "scapegoat" is replaced with "confuse". "Simply" is redundant and weakens the sentence. "As such" is borderline unnecessary in the context, and it's a phrase that should be avoided if one doesn't wish to come across as a pompous ass. "Let's" is the contraction of "let us"; its use here is unnecessary verbiage that adds to the pomposity of the statement. "You" would convey the intended meaning and be much more direct.

            'Lastly, males that take care of their hygiene far better than females do (typically trans or gays (completely hairless and far more beautiful than females despite not being able to know they in fact have penises) are very much on my radar.'

            Two opening parentheses, but only one closing parenthesis. In stylistic terms, long parenthetical comments should be avoided; it's better to rephrase and create separate sentences. "In fact" is missing a comma before and after.

            'So I'm just beating the drum here and telling females to step up and dispense of the notion that they're necessary for the future, because with their current track record. They're not.'

            "Dispense of" is non-standard usage; "dispense with" is correct. You should have used a comma rather than a period following "record".

            'Prove me wrong hags.'

            Comma missing following "wrong".

            Comment Hidden ( show )
          • You’re spewing out brain farts and trying to correct someone with horrid americanised spelling.

            🤣

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • The comma was the only true correction.

              Comment Hidden ( show )
            • Oh, so your one of those.

              The kind that thinks British English is inherently superior despite not having a handle on it.

              rofl emoji?

              Desperate much?

              you seem like you really need the attention.

              Comment Hidden ( show )
          • I’m actually British so realise would be the correct spelling for me, same as how color/colour is spelled differently depending on whether you’re from the US or UK. But either way, my parents taught me not to be mean to retarded people so I’m not going to say anything rude to you.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
          • Poniendo palabras de otras lenguajes dentro de su habla no te hace parecer inteligente. Decida a una lenguaje y lo use. También, me perde para mis pobre gramática, por estoy aprendiendo, y no estoy muy bién aún.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
      • I honestly don’t know which part of that tirade was the most homosexual, I think it’s a tie between you thinking gay men are “far more beautiful than females” and you referring to women as “the current female specimen”. The fact that your username has “queen” in it is the icing on the rainbow cake.

        Just buy yourself a pride flag, download Grinder and let your hatred of women go, you’ll feel a lot better.

        Comment Hidden ( show )