Ah ofcourse. Instead of actually sticking to the point, you become a rage case simply because you have nothing to prove your point. I am very tempted to say "Umad?".
Once again, here is a quote on it's "definition". You're asking me to read something, yet you can't accept a dictionary definition, then you sit there and ask me to read something when I just quoted you the "dictionary definition" of the word? Need me to copy and paste the "dictionary definition" for you again? Ok:
"eu·gen·ics/yo͞oˈjeniks/
Noun:
The science of improving a human population by controlled breeding to increase the occurrence of desirable heritable characteristics."
No mention of castration.
Another definition that is more so babying the definition to someone:
"eu·gen·ics
[yoo-jen-iks] Show IPA
noun ( used with a singular verb )
the study of or belief in the possibility of improving the qualities of the human species or a human population, especially by such means as discouraging reproduction by persons having genetic defects or presumed to have inheritable undesirable traits (negative eugenics) or encouraging reproduction by persons presumed to have inheritable desirable traits (positive eugenics)."
"Discouraging reproduction", not making it imposible to reproduce. Not one definition of the word involves castration or making it impossible to reproduce, yet you think you have the overall intelligence to argue that the definition of the word isn't what the word means? Oh please.
So yes, I have read something, read quite a few pages on the matter so far. Simply because I am not willing to ignore the definition of the word to believe your "opinion" of the word doesn't mean I haven't read up the matter.
You called me a thoughtless sheep, once again, you're telling me to do all this, yet you only have to read the definition to be proven wrong.
My reply made perfect sense, you just didn't have anything to counter it with due to it showing you wrong.
Thinkingaboutit: Again read something
-ItDuz gives a quote from the definition of the word-
Thinkingabout: OMG THAT MAKES NO SENSE, A DEFINITION OF FACT QUOTED FROM THE DICTIONARY, NAH MY OPINION IS MUCH MORE FACTUAL.
And you call me stupid, quite ironic.
"Believe my opinion over definition facts, if you don't, you're a cunt" - Thinkingaboutit.
Peace out, have a splendid day, pick up a dictionary on your way out
I was just reading this, and personally I don't want to argue with you about it, just to comment.
The word 'discourage' has a few meanings.
dis·cour·age
verb /disˈkərij/ /-ˈkə-rij/
Cause (someone) to lose confidence or enthusiasm
Prevent or seek to prevent (something) by showing disapproval or creating difficulties
Persuade (someone) against an action
The second definition would apply here. I don't think anyone truly into eugenics would simply discourage breeding by undesireables by giving them a stern talking to. In this case, discouraging it would lean towards preventing it all together by means such as castration, sterilization, forced abortion, execution, etc. Those would be the preventative measures that you'd call 'creating difficulties'. It certainly would be difficult to breed if you have no balls, right?
The real problem with it is, even with all we know now, we still know we can't make a perfect human. Also, the definition of 'perfect human' (or better human) would differ so greatly from one country to another, and one person to another.
It's just not something any intelligent person would support, it's so flawed and there's such a variance in what the ideal human would be.
Just to add, other forms of 'discouraging' could include deporting or banishing certain types of people, shipping them off to 'camps', rewarding the desirable and punishing the undesirable unfairly....Have you ever heard of the Cross of Honor of the German Mother? Check out the eligibility to receive the cross. Kind of disturbing. Then check out the benefits of receiving it. There are other examples of very similar things from all sorts of different places and times as well.
Is it normal that eugenics makes me sick?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
THE STATEMENT ABOVE MADE NO SENSE YOU FLAMING RETARD.
YOU DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT EUGENICS. Why don't you read about it FIRST, and then try to convince yourself that it's a science. thoughtless sheep.
No. it is not by my definition of eugenics. that's what the fuck eugenics is, you cunt. again, read something.
No, you're stupid. :)
peace out for the last time sucka.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Ah ofcourse. Instead of actually sticking to the point, you become a rage case simply because you have nothing to prove your point. I am very tempted to say "Umad?".
Once again, here is a quote on it's "definition". You're asking me to read something, yet you can't accept a dictionary definition, then you sit there and ask me to read something when I just quoted you the "dictionary definition" of the word? Need me to copy and paste the "dictionary definition" for you again? Ok:
"eu·gen·ics/yo͞oˈjeniks/
Noun:
The science of improving a human population by controlled breeding to increase the occurrence of desirable heritable characteristics."
No mention of castration.
Another definition that is more so babying the definition to someone:
"eu·gen·ics
[yoo-jen-iks] Show IPA
noun ( used with a singular verb )
the study of or belief in the possibility of improving the qualities of the human species or a human population, especially by such means as discouraging reproduction by persons having genetic defects or presumed to have inheritable undesirable traits (negative eugenics) or encouraging reproduction by persons presumed to have inheritable desirable traits (positive eugenics)."
"Discouraging reproduction", not making it imposible to reproduce. Not one definition of the word involves castration or making it impossible to reproduce, yet you think you have the overall intelligence to argue that the definition of the word isn't what the word means? Oh please.
So yes, I have read something, read quite a few pages on the matter so far. Simply because I am not willing to ignore the definition of the word to believe your "opinion" of the word doesn't mean I haven't read up the matter.
You called me a thoughtless sheep, once again, you're telling me to do all this, yet you only have to read the definition to be proven wrong.
My reply made perfect sense, you just didn't have anything to counter it with due to it showing you wrong.
Thinkingaboutit: Again read something
-ItDuz gives a quote from the definition of the word-
Thinkingabout: OMG THAT MAKES NO SENSE, A DEFINITION OF FACT QUOTED FROM THE DICTIONARY, NAH MY OPINION IS MUCH MORE FACTUAL.
And you call me stupid, quite ironic.
"Believe my opinion over definition facts, if you don't, you're a cunt" - Thinkingaboutit.
Peace out, have a splendid day, pick up a dictionary on your way out
--
wigsplitz
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I was just reading this, and personally I don't want to argue with you about it, just to comment.
The word 'discourage' has a few meanings.
dis·cour·age
verb /disˈkərij/ /-ˈkə-rij/
Cause (someone) to lose confidence or enthusiasm
Prevent or seek to prevent (something) by showing disapproval or creating difficulties
Persuade (someone) against an action
The second definition would apply here. I don't think anyone truly into eugenics would simply discourage breeding by undesireables by giving them a stern talking to. In this case, discouraging it would lean towards preventing it all together by means such as castration, sterilization, forced abortion, execution, etc. Those would be the preventative measures that you'd call 'creating difficulties'. It certainly would be difficult to breed if you have no balls, right?
The real problem with it is, even with all we know now, we still know we can't make a perfect human. Also, the definition of 'perfect human' (or better human) would differ so greatly from one country to another, and one person to another.
It's just not something any intelligent person would support, it's so flawed and there's such a variance in what the ideal human would be.
--
wigsplitz
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Just to add, other forms of 'discouraging' could include deporting or banishing certain types of people, shipping them off to 'camps', rewarding the desirable and punishing the undesirable unfairly....Have you ever heard of the Cross of Honor of the German Mother? Check out the eligibility to receive the cross. Kind of disturbing. Then check out the benefits of receiving it. There are other examples of very similar things from all sorts of different places and times as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_of_Honor_of_the_German_Mother