I can't help but feel a little bit responsible for the fact that most comments are completely missing the point. I was merely adding information which I thought you could ignore, and which regarded another species that is also consumed as food with hardly anyone knowing of a good reason to question it, when actually there is.
You use the word "inefficient" in a previous comment. I don't think this is about efficiency. Let that be a worry for those who cook lobsters. If they are doing it for personal consumption, they must consider it to be worth the trouble. And if they do it for commercialization, they must include all expenses in the price of the finished product (and consumers must consider the product to be worth that price, otherwise they wouldn't purchase it). So I really don't see your point. Almost everything could be replaced by something else that is more efficient, but less preferable to some, those who opt for the more inefficient choice at their own expense.
All of this indicates that you are a troll, and not a very good one.
I wonder how long it will take for you to die, and I mean it in a way completely detached of any feeling. It's just a question about time amount, that should be answered with a chronometer.
Who do you mean? Do you mean me or do you mean people or do you mean shellfish? That is an interesting question. Why don't you post it and I will answer it.
Is it normal people would eat such an animal?
← View full post
I can't help but feel a little bit responsible for the fact that most comments are completely missing the point. I was merely adding information which I thought you could ignore, and which regarded another species that is also consumed as food with hardly anyone knowing of a good reason to question it, when actually there is.
You use the word "inefficient" in a previous comment. I don't think this is about efficiency. Let that be a worry for those who cook lobsters. If they are doing it for personal consumption, they must consider it to be worth the trouble. And if they do it for commercialization, they must include all expenses in the price of the finished product (and consumers must consider the product to be worth that price, otherwise they wouldn't purchase it). So I really don't see your point. Almost everything could be replaced by something else that is more efficient, but less preferable to some, those who opt for the more inefficient choice at their own expense.
All of this indicates that you are a troll, and not a very good one.
--
Anonymous Post Author
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I am not a troll I was making a point.
--
little_freak
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I wonder how long it will take for you to die, and I mean it in a way completely detached of any feeling. It's just a question about time amount, that should be answered with a chronometer.
--
Anonymous Post Author
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Who do you mean? Do you mean me or do you mean people or do you mean shellfish? That is an interesting question. Why don't you post it and I will answer it.