Let me ask you this. Have you ever encountered such "paranormal activity?" Although I am a chemistry major, and adhere to the scientific method very rigorously, it is extremely unscientific to say "it does not exist, in any way, in this or any other universe" because we DO NOT KNOW the entire scope of the vast universe, or the physical matter of existence for that matter.
What i am suggesting is the possibility of, not necessarily "spirits", but rather extra dimensional "beings" that exist. I have personally experienced such events that defy the physical laws we know, that have no scientific explanation. Ive been in a room where the light switched off AND THEN the door slammed shut BY ITSELF. I saw it with my eyes. Such events are too coincidental to happen right after the other, dont you think? I was about ten years old, and to this day it still gives me chills
However i would never conclude what it was or what it was NOt either, i am just open to the skepticism of what the hell that was that evening
To answer your question, in the first part, no, I have never, "encountered such paranormal activity", and neither has anyone else, for the simple reason that nothing in this Universe, or in any other Universe, could be described as 'paranormal'. Everything in the Universe, consists of 'natural' properties, including artifacts created by technologically advanced Sentient life forms. Because we do not have knowledge or do not [fully] understand something, does not mean it is 'paranormal'.
I have begun to understand the actual nature of the Universe, albeit at a very basic level.
We actually understand the massenergy portion of the Universe quite well. We run into trouble, due to relativity related barriers, such as time relativity, event horizons and 'optical' (electromagnetic) distortion. Our major problem, is an inability to 'see' beyond time / relativity barriers imposed by Albert Einstein. He was essentially correct mathematically (algebraically), however, conceptually he had made a fundamental error. This is what I call 'banging your head against Einstein's wall'. I have now found a way around this limitation, and I have been able to conceptualize the actual nature of the Universe (with some very surprising outcomes).
What we are struggling to understand, is the so-called 'Dark matter / Dark energy' portion of the Universe. More technically correct, this should be described as 'quarkenergy', and that portion of the Universe should be described as the 'Quark Realm'.
It is hidden all around you, if you know how and where to look.
This leads us to the second part of your inquiry...
We (humans) have a tendency to make things more complex, than they really need to be.
We invent things like "extra dimensions", where they, in reality, do not exist. Albert Einstein invented one, we know this as the so-called 'spacetime dimension'.
In reality, there are only three dimensions to this Universe, and we are very familiar with this.
As for your 'experience', when you were ten years old, it was probably due to someone playing a practical joke on you, using some fishing line to manipulate the light switch and door.
Please do not use the Archaic term for a fictitious nether world, or it's euphemized forms.
Your blunt dismissal of something you have never experienced yourself is quite the statement. Furthermore, the fact that you negate the experiences of other humans from your very own understanding, which you yourself have admitted you have merely "begun to understand...at a very basic level", what is your credibility? I am genuinely asking what your major/field of study is.
You are assuming that I am a feeble minded "spiritual" person who clings to esoteric, spiritual, religious...etc beliefs of faith, belief in "god" or "spirits" "demons" and all that nonsense. Quite the opposite actually. What I did was DESCRIBE an EXPERIENCE that i cannot define, limit, conclude, or negate because there is no certainty as to what it was. I described with no conclusions or references to the mystical/god/demons/archaic primitive beliefs...etc to which you quickly jumped to conclusions and assumptions ( implying i cling to "archaic" beliefs, and going as far as saying it was someone using a fishing line..dude are you serious man? your arrogance there is astounding...and further claiming the universe is "simple"
Lets rid of the word "paranormal", now we are on common ground. I'll assign a neutral word: The "occurrence" which took place that day I was young, enlighten me, you say can be explained by "natural properties"? which ones? Which universal laws or properties did the "occurence" follow?
And what do you mean by artifacts?
This Quark Realm is hidden all around me, in the electromagnetic spectrum/wavelength/visible spectrum sense? what would make it visible if i knew "how and where to look"? (it would be consistent on your part to suggest it be due natural "laws", due to membrane receptors)
And what is the difference between your "conception" of the universe, and einstein's "conception" of the universe (which you deem fundamentally incorrect) Essentially you are presenting two conceptions, your and his, the difference is that you are saying his is "wrong". What is it about yours that is progressive? How can you know in the future someone else wont likewise discredit your perception as "fundamentally wrong"? Niels Bohr had his atomic theory "modified" by those who contributed and built from that theory and progressed it
Its somewhat ironic that now you are explaining yourself very vaguely in terms of perceptions, conceptions, and almost in an esoteric sense, which lead to my asking you more questions than you answered.
And i am a chemistry/biology major, im assuming you are studying astronomy/engineering, so i am genuinenly asking for your input
Incorrect. I have experienced such things, that I did not have a logical explanation for. However, I did not simply attribute these to some 'supernatural' or 'paranormal' events, which do not exist in nature. I sought to understand what could be causing these.
For instance, when I was a young man, and very much in love with a very beautiful young woman, after we had split up, I knew before I had any sensory clues, if she was in the vicinity. I can now explain how this works in Physical terms.
I began to try to understand the Universe at a very young age. I was reading University level textbooks by the time I was seven years old. I was most interested in the natural world around me. I have studied Physics, Subatomic Physics, Theoretical Physics, Cosmology, Astronomy, Geology, Biology, Geography, History and Pre-History (Paleoanthropology), various Life Sciences, and numerous other things in the Humanities and other things which interest me.
No, I did not 'assume' that, I try not to 'assume' anything. I sometimes (rarely) make a postulate or hypothesis based on evidence (both factual and abstract) or reason.
I did not make any 'conclusions' about your experience. I had said, that was a 'possible' (probable) explanation. Did you ask other people who might have been around, whether they were playing tricks on you? Are they lying?
The Universe is relatively simple to understand. It is humans who make it more complex than it needs to be. I could teach this to an astute high school student in probably about two weeks. It is a human flaw, which causes extravagances, sometimes resulting in unfounded assumptions and jumping to conclusions.
Your "occurrence" was the result of Physical laws in the massenergy Universe, and nothing else. I don't know exactly what caused it, because I wasn't there.
An 'artifact' is anything real, that is created through the use of technology. (Some of the chemical compounds or transuranium elements, which are not typically found in nature, are two examples).
Incorrect. The electromagnetic spectrum is in the Mass-Energy Realm.
The Quark Realm cannot be made 'visible', without the use of technology.
You are 'looking' in the incorrect way.
The Quark Realm is subject to Physical (or natural) laws. Membrane receptors has nothing to do with it (another extravagance). The way your brain processes information, does have something to do with it, however.
The difference between my, "Universal Parametric Theory", and the "Special and General Theories of Relativity", is that my theory shows the inter-relationships between Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Newtonian Physics, Electromagnetic Theory, 'the Big Bang (which wasn't) Theory, Particle Physics, Dark Matter / Dark Energy, and the Large Scale Structure of the Universe.
Albert Einstein was algebraically correct, but he conceptualized the Universe as E = MC2,
he should have seen it as C = √ E / M , (but there's more to it than that).
Never 'assume', this is how popular misconceptions start. I am not formally studying those things.
Is it normal my 4YO talks about ghost and killed people all the time?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Let me ask you this. Have you ever encountered such "paranormal activity?" Although I am a chemistry major, and adhere to the scientific method very rigorously, it is extremely unscientific to say "it does not exist, in any way, in this or any other universe" because we DO NOT KNOW the entire scope of the vast universe, or the physical matter of existence for that matter.
What i am suggesting is the possibility of, not necessarily "spirits", but rather extra dimensional "beings" that exist. I have personally experienced such events that defy the physical laws we know, that have no scientific explanation. Ive been in a room where the light switched off AND THEN the door slammed shut BY ITSELF. I saw it with my eyes. Such events are too coincidental to happen right after the other, dont you think? I was about ten years old, and to this day it still gives me chills
However i would never conclude what it was or what it was NOt either, i am just open to the skepticism of what the hell that was that evening
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
To answer your question, in the first part, no, I have never, "encountered such paranormal activity", and neither has anyone else, for the simple reason that nothing in this Universe, or in any other Universe, could be described as 'paranormal'. Everything in the Universe, consists of 'natural' properties, including artifacts created by technologically advanced Sentient life forms. Because we do not have knowledge or do not [fully] understand something, does not mean it is 'paranormal'.
I have begun to understand the actual nature of the Universe, albeit at a very basic level.
We actually understand the massenergy portion of the Universe quite well. We run into trouble, due to relativity related barriers, such as time relativity, event horizons and 'optical' (electromagnetic) distortion. Our major problem, is an inability to 'see' beyond time / relativity barriers imposed by Albert Einstein. He was essentially correct mathematically (algebraically), however, conceptually he had made a fundamental error. This is what I call 'banging your head against Einstein's wall'. I have now found a way around this limitation, and I have been able to conceptualize the actual nature of the Universe (with some very surprising outcomes).
What we are struggling to understand, is the so-called 'Dark matter / Dark energy' portion of the Universe. More technically correct, this should be described as 'quarkenergy', and that portion of the Universe should be described as the 'Quark Realm'.
It is hidden all around you, if you know how and where to look.
This leads us to the second part of your inquiry...
We (humans) have a tendency to make things more complex, than they really need to be.
We invent things like "extra dimensions", where they, in reality, do not exist. Albert Einstein invented one, we know this as the so-called 'spacetime dimension'.
In reality, there are only three dimensions to this Universe, and we are very familiar with this.
As for your 'experience', when you were ten years old, it was probably due to someone playing a practical joke on you, using some fishing line to manipulate the light switch and door.
Please do not use the Archaic term for a fictitious nether world, or it's euphemized forms.
--
throat_cutter
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Your blunt dismissal of something you have never experienced yourself is quite the statement. Furthermore, the fact that you negate the experiences of other humans from your very own understanding, which you yourself have admitted you have merely "begun to understand...at a very basic level", what is your credibility? I am genuinely asking what your major/field of study is.
You are assuming that I am a feeble minded "spiritual" person who clings to esoteric, spiritual, religious...etc beliefs of faith, belief in "god" or "spirits" "demons" and all that nonsense. Quite the opposite actually. What I did was DESCRIBE an EXPERIENCE that i cannot define, limit, conclude, or negate because there is no certainty as to what it was. I described with no conclusions or references to the mystical/god/demons/archaic primitive beliefs...etc to which you quickly jumped to conclusions and assumptions ( implying i cling to "archaic" beliefs, and going as far as saying it was someone using a fishing line..dude are you serious man? your arrogance there is astounding...and further claiming the universe is "simple"
Lets rid of the word "paranormal", now we are on common ground. I'll assign a neutral word: The "occurrence" which took place that day I was young, enlighten me, you say can be explained by "natural properties"? which ones? Which universal laws or properties did the "occurence" follow?
And what do you mean by artifacts?
This Quark Realm is hidden all around me, in the electromagnetic spectrum/wavelength/visible spectrum sense? what would make it visible if i knew "how and where to look"? (it would be consistent on your part to suggest it be due natural "laws", due to membrane receptors)
And what is the difference between your "conception" of the universe, and einstein's "conception" of the universe (which you deem fundamentally incorrect) Essentially you are presenting two conceptions, your and his, the difference is that you are saying his is "wrong". What is it about yours that is progressive? How can you know in the future someone else wont likewise discredit your perception as "fundamentally wrong"? Niels Bohr had his atomic theory "modified" by those who contributed and built from that theory and progressed it
Its somewhat ironic that now you are explaining yourself very vaguely in terms of perceptions, conceptions, and almost in an esoteric sense, which lead to my asking you more questions than you answered.
And i am a chemistry/biology major, im assuming you are studying astronomy/engineering, so i am genuinenly asking for your input
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Incorrect. I have experienced such things, that I did not have a logical explanation for. However, I did not simply attribute these to some 'supernatural' or 'paranormal' events, which do not exist in nature. I sought to understand what could be causing these.
For instance, when I was a young man, and very much in love with a very beautiful young woman, after we had split up, I knew before I had any sensory clues, if she was in the vicinity. I can now explain how this works in Physical terms.
I began to try to understand the Universe at a very young age. I was reading University level textbooks by the time I was seven years old. I was most interested in the natural world around me. I have studied Physics, Subatomic Physics, Theoretical Physics, Cosmology, Astronomy, Geology, Biology, Geography, History and Pre-History (Paleoanthropology), various Life Sciences, and numerous other things in the Humanities and other things which interest me.
No, I did not 'assume' that, I try not to 'assume' anything. I sometimes (rarely) make a postulate or hypothesis based on evidence (both factual and abstract) or reason.
I did not make any 'conclusions' about your experience. I had said, that was a 'possible' (probable) explanation. Did you ask other people who might have been around, whether they were playing tricks on you? Are they lying?
The Universe is relatively simple to understand. It is humans who make it more complex than it needs to be. I could teach this to an astute high school student in probably about two weeks. It is a human flaw, which causes extravagances, sometimes resulting in unfounded assumptions and jumping to conclusions.
Your "occurrence" was the result of Physical laws in the massenergy Universe, and nothing else. I don't know exactly what caused it, because I wasn't there.
An 'artifact' is anything real, that is created through the use of technology. (Some of the chemical compounds or transuranium elements, which are not typically found in nature, are two examples).
Incorrect. The electromagnetic spectrum is in the Mass-Energy Realm.
The Quark Realm cannot be made 'visible', without the use of technology.
You are 'looking' in the incorrect way.
The Quark Realm is subject to Physical (or natural) laws. Membrane receptors has nothing to do with it (another extravagance). The way your brain processes information, does have something to do with it, however.
The difference between my, "Universal Parametric Theory", and the "Special and General Theories of Relativity", is that my theory shows the inter-relationships between Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Newtonian Physics, Electromagnetic Theory, 'the Big Bang (which wasn't) Theory, Particle Physics, Dark Matter / Dark Energy, and the Large Scale Structure of the Universe.
Albert Einstein was algebraically correct, but he conceptualized the Universe as E = MC2,
he should have seen it as C = √ E / M , (but there's more to it than that).
Never 'assume', this is how popular misconceptions start. I am not formally studying those things.