Wow, you think you have disproven and/or embaressed me? How could you of disproved my main point if you haven't engaged in the main point?
Embaressed? This is the internet, and you have by no means embaressed me. Spelling mistake? Just yesterday someone corrected a spelling mistake I didn't intentionally make, and I accepted it, apologized for thinking they were wrong on correcting me, and then I finished by thanking them for correcting me, and at the time I wasn't having a friendly debate with the person. So why would I happily admit to being corrected by someone I was having a heated debate with but not another? Because what I did was intentional.
To prove some sort of point they can't seem to explain? Funny, my second last reply explaines exactly the point of it, not my fault if you didn't read it.
Flailing uselessly making their original argument? You haven't engaged at all in my original argument, so how would I have to be "flailing"?
Master puppeteer? Nope, I'm no master at it, I'm good at it, but no master, you're just easily manipulated.
The title alone shows that I am not number one "Winning by losing". I have in no manner lost this. Everything you have said has been flipped on its side. But, I will give you the chance to prove that wrong. Take any part of our little talk and see if there is any part you have proved me wrong on, then tell me what comment it is on.
Now on to your number four. I never corrected your grammar, I corrected the definition of the word you uses, and if you need that explained to you on how they are two different things, then...Well, it's obvious at this point.
If this was predictable, yet you engaged in it, engaged in something you predicted to happen, regardless of me taking down all of your points. You're a smart one. I like your whole "I'll say I don't want to engage, yet I'll engage" tactic...Not really.
And I find it funny that you actually went on to such a thing to explain argument tactics...Why you would look something like that up is...interesting?
Or maybe you just need everything explained to you in baby steps, because everyone else understands my points perfectly, even if they dissagree.
TL;DR? Were you asking me that it is too long and you didn't read it...? And you tell me to learn to make my points more succinctly.
You must not read books much, if you can't read simple things that wouldn't even be considered as long as a page in a book.
"God almighty", don't ever go in to any career that requires opposing opinions, you have clearly stated that everything you don't want to hear, and everything you can't prove wrong is something you avoid paying any attention to. My, my. How terrible the world would be if people like you were in control. Avoid engaging in anything to do with the topics, but engage in trivial matters.
But, what amazes me is that if it was too long and that you didn't read it, how in the world would you know if I need to make my points more succinctly or alternativly? Surely someone not reading what is sent to them wouldn't know. So that means two things, that you're either reading what I'm saying regardless of you saying you haven't in hopes to indirectly say "you're typing all this out, and I'm not reading it" in attempts for me not to type out so much, or you are simply saying it without even reading anything I am saying, showing that you don't know if I need to learn to make my points more succintly or alternativly yet say it simply because I am against you on the subject, meaning you will say I'm wrong, yet you have not read the opposing points and can't prove them wrong. "I'm right because I said so, you're wrong because I said so"...Oh, you so smart, you so smart, Hamich. ;)
Don't blame me for your lack of simple understanding, "Bruva". Let me guess, "TL;DR" yet read every word? Pityful. Atleast there is entertainment in the IIN community.
Is it normal it annoys me when people try to argue with idiots
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Wow, you think you have disproven and/or embaressed me? How could you of disproved my main point if you haven't engaged in the main point?
Embaressed? This is the internet, and you have by no means embaressed me. Spelling mistake? Just yesterday someone corrected a spelling mistake I didn't intentionally make, and I accepted it, apologized for thinking they were wrong on correcting me, and then I finished by thanking them for correcting me, and at the time I wasn't having a friendly debate with the person. So why would I happily admit to being corrected by someone I was having a heated debate with but not another? Because what I did was intentional.
To prove some sort of point they can't seem to explain? Funny, my second last reply explaines exactly the point of it, not my fault if you didn't read it.
Flailing uselessly making their original argument? You haven't engaged at all in my original argument, so how would I have to be "flailing"?
Master puppeteer? Nope, I'm no master at it, I'm good at it, but no master, you're just easily manipulated.
The title alone shows that I am not number one "Winning by losing". I have in no manner lost this. Everything you have said has been flipped on its side. But, I will give you the chance to prove that wrong. Take any part of our little talk and see if there is any part you have proved me wrong on, then tell me what comment it is on.
Now on to your number four. I never corrected your grammar, I corrected the definition of the word you uses, and if you need that explained to you on how they are two different things, then...Well, it's obvious at this point.
If this was predictable, yet you engaged in it, engaged in something you predicted to happen, regardless of me taking down all of your points. You're a smart one. I like your whole "I'll say I don't want to engage, yet I'll engage" tactic...Not really.
And I find it funny that you actually went on to such a thing to explain argument tactics...Why you would look something like that up is...interesting?
You lost this, and that was "predictable".
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
God almighty. TLDR?
You need to learn to make your points more succinctly. Or alternatively, get a fucking job bruvvvvvva
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Or maybe you just need everything explained to you in baby steps, because everyone else understands my points perfectly, even if they dissagree.
TL;DR? Were you asking me that it is too long and you didn't read it...? And you tell me to learn to make my points more succinctly.
You must not read books much, if you can't read simple things that wouldn't even be considered as long as a page in a book.
"God almighty", don't ever go in to any career that requires opposing opinions, you have clearly stated that everything you don't want to hear, and everything you can't prove wrong is something you avoid paying any attention to. My, my. How terrible the world would be if people like you were in control. Avoid engaging in anything to do with the topics, but engage in trivial matters.
But, what amazes me is that if it was too long and that you didn't read it, how in the world would you know if I need to make my points more succinctly or alternativly? Surely someone not reading what is sent to them wouldn't know. So that means two things, that you're either reading what I'm saying regardless of you saying you haven't in hopes to indirectly say "you're typing all this out, and I'm not reading it" in attempts for me not to type out so much, or you are simply saying it without even reading anything I am saying, showing that you don't know if I need to learn to make my points more succintly or alternativly yet say it simply because I am against you on the subject, meaning you will say I'm wrong, yet you have not read the opposing points and can't prove them wrong. "I'm right because I said so, you're wrong because I said so"...Oh, you so smart, you so smart, Hamich. ;)
Don't blame me for your lack of simple understanding, "Bruva". Let me guess, "TL;DR" yet read every word? Pityful. Atleast there is entertainment in the IIN community.