All I can do is grin. Let me explain why.
I do this all the time when I'm "encouraging" someone to reply to me in a manner they believe they could mock me on, just to prove my point that they aren't ignoring because they want to, they are ignoring me because they have to if they want any standing in a discussion.
My spelling does need improvement, and I am sure there are some other than "incourage" in there that you could of picked from, but sadly, the "incouraged" one wasn't a mistake, it was an intentional spelling mistake. I have done this to over ten people on this site, people like you. I'll give you an edge, I'll spell something wrong that is obvious to notice so that the person that doesn't want to "engage" thinks "Ha, what an idiot, here is the chance to prove he's an idiot" and engages to correct me. That then opens it up for me to say "If you don't want to engage, then why did you just correct me to mock me?"
So now, given by your response, it isn't the fact that you don't want to show me as an idiot, because when I give you an oppurunity to do so, you jump at the chance to do it, it's that you just have nothing to prove I am an idiot without being given an oppurtunity to do so.
How proud you must of felt, just to realize you were being manipulated. The sad part is that you can actually be manipulated by text alone.
I made a small mistake while doing this to you. You see where I first went to spell encourage is "Incourage"? That's when I got the idea. I quickly deleted the "en" to ad "in", but missed the "n".
So, you done exactly what I wanted and expected. You just proved that you are happy to read, reply (engage) and mock me on things that have obvious (intentional) errors, yet refuse to read, reply (engage), and mock me on the actual matter.
I am still smirking over how proud you must of felt, that all that proudness was in vain, "darling".
You made me giggle. I hadn't done it in a long time, and I was 60% sure you would of picked up on it, nice to see that regarless of how stupid I thought you are, you're even more stupid than what I originally thought. I forgot how good it felt to do this.
...I just read the bottom part...Are you seriously taking tips online on how to argue? -Facepalm-
Not to mention, the page doesn't at all have any value to this discussion. I've "asked" you to explain your point, then I have asked you what area you believe yourself to have made more logical sense than me, and when I have given you the ball to say "go ahead, your turn" you decide to say "TL;DR" and ignore it completely.
This is getting beyond funny, it's actually becoming quite pityful...In a funny way.
You started something, now you can't finnish it. Not to toot my own horn, but you really should of gotten a second opinion on if targeting someone such as me is a good idea on your posts, and as you can see, it wasn't a good idea.
Dude, just go away. I'm not even reading your essays. 91 percent of people agree that your story is a good example of something fucking retarded which isn't worth engaging with. I'm not going to argue with you, it's boring and we'll never agree with each other. Just go do something else. Jeez.
91%? Oh really, then tell me, who are these 91 percenters? The majority of them didn't even understand the story, and when I explained it to them, they said that I had somewhat of a point. Even when I put it in a simple example, not one person would answer it, yet they still engaged.
You're not reading my "essays", yet you say I need to work on how to explain my points...? Great logic. So if you are not reading them, then you just admitted that you don't take any opposing opinions in to account, and you think your opinion is the only right one.
If it isn't worth engaging in, then why does my story have the most comments a story has had in a long while?
You're not going to argue with me because you can't. It's boring? I'm not asking you to reply to me. We'll never agree? Then why engage?
Take your own advice and "do something else", because if it hasn't dawned on you yet, if you reply, I reply, that's how it works. If you don't reply, then I don't reply. Like I said, you simply won't get the last word.
If you want it to stop, make it stop, don't reply. You are the one talking about not engaging, yet when all you have to do to not carry this on is to not engage, you seem to not be able to not engage.
Wow, you think you have disproven and/or embaressed me? How could you of disproved my main point if you haven't engaged in the main point?
Embaressed? This is the internet, and you have by no means embaressed me. Spelling mistake? Just yesterday someone corrected a spelling mistake I didn't intentionally make, and I accepted it, apologized for thinking they were wrong on correcting me, and then I finished by thanking them for correcting me, and at the time I wasn't having a friendly debate with the person. So why would I happily admit to being corrected by someone I was having a heated debate with but not another? Because what I did was intentional.
To prove some sort of point they can't seem to explain? Funny, my second last reply explaines exactly the point of it, not my fault if you didn't read it.
Flailing uselessly making their original argument? You haven't engaged at all in my original argument, so how would I have to be "flailing"?
Master puppeteer? Nope, I'm no master at it, I'm good at it, but no master, you're just easily manipulated.
The title alone shows that I am not number one "Winning by losing". I have in no manner lost this. Everything you have said has been flipped on its side. But, I will give you the chance to prove that wrong. Take any part of our little talk and see if there is any part you have proved me wrong on, then tell me what comment it is on.
Now on to your number four. I never corrected your grammar, I corrected the definition of the word you uses, and if you need that explained to you on how they are two different things, then...Well, it's obvious at this point.
If this was predictable, yet you engaged in it, engaged in something you predicted to happen, regardless of me taking down all of your points. You're a smart one. I like your whole "I'll say I don't want to engage, yet I'll engage" tactic...Not really.
And I find it funny that you actually went on to such a thing to explain argument tactics...Why you would look something like that up is...interesting?
Or maybe you just need everything explained to you in baby steps, because everyone else understands my points perfectly, even if they dissagree.
TL;DR? Were you asking me that it is too long and you didn't read it...? And you tell me to learn to make my points more succinctly.
You must not read books much, if you can't read simple things that wouldn't even be considered as long as a page in a book.
"God almighty", don't ever go in to any career that requires opposing opinions, you have clearly stated that everything you don't want to hear, and everything you can't prove wrong is something you avoid paying any attention to. My, my. How terrible the world would be if people like you were in control. Avoid engaging in anything to do with the topics, but engage in trivial matters.
But, what amazes me is that if it was too long and that you didn't read it, how in the world would you know if I need to make my points more succinctly or alternativly? Surely someone not reading what is sent to them wouldn't know. So that means two things, that you're either reading what I'm saying regardless of you saying you haven't in hopes to indirectly say "you're typing all this out, and I'm not reading it" in attempts for me not to type out so much, or you are simply saying it without even reading anything I am saying, showing that you don't know if I need to learn to make my points more succintly or alternativly yet say it simply because I am against you on the subject, meaning you will say I'm wrong, yet you have not read the opposing points and can't prove them wrong. "I'm right because I said so, you're wrong because I said so"...Oh, you so smart, you so smart, Hamich. ;)
Don't blame me for your lack of simple understanding, "Bruva". Let me guess, "TL;DR" yet read every word? Pityful. Atleast there is entertainment in the IIN community.
Is it normal it annoys me when people try to argue with idiots
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
All I can do is grin. Let me explain why.
I do this all the time when I'm "encouraging" someone to reply to me in a manner they believe they could mock me on, just to prove my point that they aren't ignoring because they want to, they are ignoring me because they have to if they want any standing in a discussion.
My spelling does need improvement, and I am sure there are some other than "incourage" in there that you could of picked from, but sadly, the "incouraged" one wasn't a mistake, it was an intentional spelling mistake. I have done this to over ten people on this site, people like you. I'll give you an edge, I'll spell something wrong that is obvious to notice so that the person that doesn't want to "engage" thinks "Ha, what an idiot, here is the chance to prove he's an idiot" and engages to correct me. That then opens it up for me to say "If you don't want to engage, then why did you just correct me to mock me?"
So now, given by your response, it isn't the fact that you don't want to show me as an idiot, because when I give you an oppurunity to do so, you jump at the chance to do it, it's that you just have nothing to prove I am an idiot without being given an oppurtunity to do so.
How proud you must of felt, just to realize you were being manipulated. The sad part is that you can actually be manipulated by text alone.
I made a small mistake while doing this to you. You see where I first went to spell encourage is "Incourage"? That's when I got the idea. I quickly deleted the "en" to ad "in", but missed the "n".
So, you done exactly what I wanted and expected. You just proved that you are happy to read, reply (engage) and mock me on things that have obvious (intentional) errors, yet refuse to read, reply (engage), and mock me on the actual matter.
I am still smirking over how proud you must of felt, that all that proudness was in vain, "darling".
You made me giggle. I hadn't done it in a long time, and I was 60% sure you would of picked up on it, nice to see that regarless of how stupid I thought you are, you're even more stupid than what I originally thought. I forgot how good it felt to do this.
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Again, TL, DR
Give up man, I really couldn't care less, go argue about something worthwhile
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
And yet you care about having the last word. Believe me, you won't have it.
Don't worry, that last reply wasn't really only for you, mainly so that the people viewing our little talk can see how easily led you are.
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
http://www.cracked.com/funny-3809-internet-argument-techniques/
You're number one, I'm apparently being number 4, this is predictable and stupid and exactly what I wanted to avoid.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
...I just read the bottom part...Are you seriously taking tips online on how to argue? -Facepalm-
Not to mention, the page doesn't at all have any value to this discussion. I've "asked" you to explain your point, then I have asked you what area you believe yourself to have made more logical sense than me, and when I have given you the ball to say "go ahead, your turn" you decide to say "TL;DR" and ignore it completely.
This is getting beyond funny, it's actually becoming quite pityful...In a funny way.
You started something, now you can't finnish it. Not to toot my own horn, but you really should of gotten a second opinion on if targeting someone such as me is a good idea on your posts, and as you can see, it wasn't a good idea.
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Dude, just go away. I'm not even reading your essays. 91 percent of people agree that your story is a good example of something fucking retarded which isn't worth engaging with. I'm not going to argue with you, it's boring and we'll never agree with each other. Just go do something else. Jeez.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
91%? Oh really, then tell me, who are these 91 percenters? The majority of them didn't even understand the story, and when I explained it to them, they said that I had somewhat of a point. Even when I put it in a simple example, not one person would answer it, yet they still engaged.
You're not reading my "essays", yet you say I need to work on how to explain my points...? Great logic. So if you are not reading them, then you just admitted that you don't take any opposing opinions in to account, and you think your opinion is the only right one.
If it isn't worth engaging in, then why does my story have the most comments a story has had in a long while?
You're not going to argue with me because you can't. It's boring? I'm not asking you to reply to me. We'll never agree? Then why engage?
Take your own advice and "do something else", because if it hasn't dawned on you yet, if you reply, I reply, that's how it works. If you don't reply, then I don't reply. Like I said, you simply won't get the last word.
If you want it to stop, make it stop, don't reply. You are the one talking about not engaging, yet when all you have to do to not carry this on is to not engage, you seem to not be able to not engage.
Practice what you preach. "Jeez".
Also, just curious. What user are you? I have a feeling you're Hamich (or however he/she spells it), which wouldn't suprise me.
Surely if you have the higher standing in this, you would have no problem showing what user you are?
-Waits for excuse not to show what user you are-
Wow, you think you have disproven and/or embaressed me? How could you of disproved my main point if you haven't engaged in the main point?
Embaressed? This is the internet, and you have by no means embaressed me. Spelling mistake? Just yesterday someone corrected a spelling mistake I didn't intentionally make, and I accepted it, apologized for thinking they were wrong on correcting me, and then I finished by thanking them for correcting me, and at the time I wasn't having a friendly debate with the person. So why would I happily admit to being corrected by someone I was having a heated debate with but not another? Because what I did was intentional.
To prove some sort of point they can't seem to explain? Funny, my second last reply explaines exactly the point of it, not my fault if you didn't read it.
Flailing uselessly making their original argument? You haven't engaged at all in my original argument, so how would I have to be "flailing"?
Master puppeteer? Nope, I'm no master at it, I'm good at it, but no master, you're just easily manipulated.
The title alone shows that I am not number one "Winning by losing". I have in no manner lost this. Everything you have said has been flipped on its side. But, I will give you the chance to prove that wrong. Take any part of our little talk and see if there is any part you have proved me wrong on, then tell me what comment it is on.
Now on to your number four. I never corrected your grammar, I corrected the definition of the word you uses, and if you need that explained to you on how they are two different things, then...Well, it's obvious at this point.
If this was predictable, yet you engaged in it, engaged in something you predicted to happen, regardless of me taking down all of your points. You're a smart one. I like your whole "I'll say I don't want to engage, yet I'll engage" tactic...Not really.
And I find it funny that you actually went on to such a thing to explain argument tactics...Why you would look something like that up is...interesting?
You lost this, and that was "predictable".
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
God almighty. TLDR?
You need to learn to make your points more succinctly. Or alternatively, get a fucking job bruvvvvvva
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Or maybe you just need everything explained to you in baby steps, because everyone else understands my points perfectly, even if they dissagree.
TL;DR? Were you asking me that it is too long and you didn't read it...? And you tell me to learn to make my points more succinctly.
You must not read books much, if you can't read simple things that wouldn't even be considered as long as a page in a book.
"God almighty", don't ever go in to any career that requires opposing opinions, you have clearly stated that everything you don't want to hear, and everything you can't prove wrong is something you avoid paying any attention to. My, my. How terrible the world would be if people like you were in control. Avoid engaging in anything to do with the topics, but engage in trivial matters.
But, what amazes me is that if it was too long and that you didn't read it, how in the world would you know if I need to make my points more succinctly or alternativly? Surely someone not reading what is sent to them wouldn't know. So that means two things, that you're either reading what I'm saying regardless of you saying you haven't in hopes to indirectly say "you're typing all this out, and I'm not reading it" in attempts for me not to type out so much, or you are simply saying it without even reading anything I am saying, showing that you don't know if I need to learn to make my points more succintly or alternativly yet say it simply because I am against you on the subject, meaning you will say I'm wrong, yet you have not read the opposing points and can't prove them wrong. "I'm right because I said so, you're wrong because I said so"...Oh, you so smart, you so smart, Hamich. ;)
Don't blame me for your lack of simple understanding, "Bruva". Let me guess, "TL;DR" yet read every word? Pityful. Atleast there is entertainment in the IIN community.