The "Big Bang Theory of the Universe", contains several inconsistencies, which could not be true to the Actual Nature of the Universe.
The "Big Bang Theory of the Universe", does, however, uncover some truths about the Universe.
A good Analogy.
Incorrect.
Not everyone attended College or University.
Incorrect.
Most people do not hate a generic term for a deity, and / or religion.
Personally, I rather enjoy an energetic discussion on such topics of conversation. It would be helpful, however, if those who wish to engage in such conversations, would converse about one or more particular deities, and / or converse about actual religious concepts, rather than endlessly bandying Archaic words and terms about, with no significance or meaning.
Which deity are you referring to?
Incorrect.
Most people could not be of above average intelligence, as this would raise the average intelligence of all people.
Some people are of below average intelligence, a few people are of average (better: near average) intelligence, and some people are of above average intelligence.
Incorrect.
Grammar does not have anything to do with a defunct German political party. Many people who continue to spread this claptrap around, probably do not know what a 'fascia' or 'fascicle' is. They should learn some grammar.
Furthermore, the term which you had used, alludes to Archaic -ists and -isms.
Does humanity need to be continually reminded about such Archaic concepts, from certain ignorant persons?
Yes, I do sometimes tell them when they are correct or incorrect. Sometimes, when I tell them the latter, they disagree with me, however.
This is why civilised discussion / debate is important.
Is it normal IIN reminds me of the big bang?
← View full post
Correct.
The "Big Bang Theory of the Universe", contains several inconsistencies, which could not be true to the Actual Nature of the Universe.
The "Big Bang Theory of the Universe", does, however, uncover some truths about the Universe.
A good Analogy.
Incorrect.
Not everyone attended College or University.
Incorrect.
Most people do not hate a generic term for a deity, and / or religion.
Personally, I rather enjoy an energetic discussion on such topics of conversation. It would be helpful, however, if those who wish to engage in such conversations, would converse about one or more particular deities, and / or converse about actual religious concepts, rather than endlessly bandying Archaic words and terms about, with no significance or meaning.
Which deity are you referring to?
Incorrect.
Most people could not be of above average intelligence, as this would raise the average intelligence of all people.
Some people are of below average intelligence, a few people are of average (better: near average) intelligence, and some people are of above average intelligence.
Incorrect.
Grammar does not have anything to do with a defunct German political party. Many people who continue to spread this claptrap around, probably do not know what a 'fascia' or 'fascicle' is. They should learn some grammar.
Furthermore, the term which you had used, alludes to Archaic -ists and -isms.
Does humanity need to be continually reminded about such Archaic concepts, from certain ignorant persons?
--
SchumpetersGale
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
I can tell that you're very smart. But do you have any friends at all? Do you tell them when they're correct or incorrect?
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yes, I do have friends.
Yes, I do sometimes tell them when they are correct or incorrect. Sometimes, when I tell them the latter, they disagree with me, however.
This is why civilised discussion / debate is important.
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Also, how would I know, if I agreed with them, that they were correct, if we were both incorrect?
Fact checkers needed.
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
But, is the widely accepted fact of the matter, actually true and / or correct?
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Are there other / better ways or methods of accomplishing something, or is there a different or alternate way / means of understanding something?
What works for one person, might not necessarily work for another.