People are stronger socially when they are in a family union? What an utter fallacious argument.
Many many individuals are introverts, naturally born, some can argue, genetically born with those traits. It does not matter if you stick force or throw them in a group of people with the assumption or hope they will turn amiable. Many individuals enjoy their solitude in childhood, preteens, teens, adult and beyond.
Sure if my child turns out to be a natural introvert, I will accept him for who he is (of course life will take its course and be naturally exposed to family values and social tendencies), but I will never force him to be an extrovert or teach him that others around him will be better off in life, simply for having a father.
People are not born introverts.It's not an innate feature. They become like that because of the influence of their surroundings and their experiences. Being an introvert is not a trait, it's a state of mind.
"Sure if my child turns out to be a natural introvert, I will accept him for who he is". - Yet another example why a woman cannot raise a child by herself. Because women are too accepting of their child's negative habits that might harm both him/her and their mother in the future. Love alone is not enough to raise a child. Antisocial behavior can be corrected. And for that someone who is strict can intervene. And that is when the father's role comes in. With discipline and strictness, wisdom and good will the child can be put on a right path again. Because in some cases introverts turn asocial and from being asocial they can become antisocial, sometimes even sociopaths.
There is not one positive thing about being an introvert. Having no friends, no colleagues, no acquaintances makes it difficult to get around in life. Humans are social creatures by nature.
Let us clarify the definition of introvert, because you do not understand it.
Being an introvert does not mean one is shy.
Being an introvert does not mean one is passive.
Being an introvert does not mean it is associated with all those negative traits you assume it is.
Many famous and successful persons in history were and are introverts. The list is too long for me to list here.
Some of the most heinous serial killers including John Wayne Gacy and Ted Bundy were extroverts, appearing gregarious on the outside, yet sadistic with anti social sentiments on the inside.
You are touching on a complex behavioral topic with lots of gray areas that you bluntly define.
For the sake of this debate, review the definition of introverts, and all the scholarly and scientific articles published
Also, you are now verging on a certain prejudice against women, saying yet "another reason why they are not fit to raise children" If you are going to stereotype then im not going to argue with idiots
You are simply not worth my time debating if you are going to rant on stereotypical arguments, which trust me ive seen before and am tired of.
IIN I want a man free child
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
People are stronger socially when they are in a family union? What an utter fallacious argument.
Many many individuals are introverts, naturally born, some can argue, genetically born with those traits. It does not matter if you stick force or throw them in a group of people with the assumption or hope they will turn amiable. Many individuals enjoy their solitude in childhood, preteens, teens, adult and beyond.
Sure if my child turns out to be a natural introvert, I will accept him for who he is (of course life will take its course and be naturally exposed to family values and social tendencies), but I will never force him to be an extrovert or teach him that others around him will be better off in life, simply for having a father.
--
Crusades
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
People are not born introverts.It's not an innate feature. They become like that because of the influence of their surroundings and their experiences. Being an introvert is not a trait, it's a state of mind.
"Sure if my child turns out to be a natural introvert, I will accept him for who he is". - Yet another example why a woman cannot raise a child by herself. Because women are too accepting of their child's negative habits that might harm both him/her and their mother in the future. Love alone is not enough to raise a child. Antisocial behavior can be corrected. And for that someone who is strict can intervene. And that is when the father's role comes in. With discipline and strictness, wisdom and good will the child can be put on a right path again. Because in some cases introverts turn asocial and from being asocial they can become antisocial, sometimes even sociopaths.
There is not one positive thing about being an introvert. Having no friends, no colleagues, no acquaintances makes it difficult to get around in life. Humans are social creatures by nature.
--
Anonymous Post Author
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Let us clarify the definition of introvert, because you do not understand it.
Being an introvert does not mean one is shy.
Being an introvert does not mean one is passive.
Being an introvert does not mean it is associated with all those negative traits you assume it is.
Many famous and successful persons in history were and are introverts. The list is too long for me to list here.
Some of the most heinous serial killers including John Wayne Gacy and Ted Bundy were extroverts, appearing gregarious on the outside, yet sadistic with anti social sentiments on the inside.
You are touching on a complex behavioral topic with lots of gray areas that you bluntly define.
For the sake of this debate, review the definition of introverts, and all the scholarly and scientific articles published
Also, you are now verging on a certain prejudice against women, saying yet "another reason why they are not fit to raise children" If you are going to stereotype then im not going to argue with idiots
You are simply not worth my time debating if you are going to rant on stereotypical arguments, which trust me ive seen before and am tired of.