Let me clarify, you wonderfully intelligent being that still did voice an opinion that separating people according to their skin color, which by no means is 100% the indicator of what race they really are has brought up.
Racism is a superiority complex, since "also" by no means does "skin..colour" indicate ability OR character in an individual. Also neither does genetics laughably (don't argue anyone I will not debate you on it) so by definition there is no such thing as inter-racism(New word lol). My mistake, people are hateful toward their own kind, so putting them together solves nothing. In fact more hate would be bred off of the new situation from new ideas and all sorts of lunacy. I hope you do not think your race will fly off into the sky because you have "shed" the yolks of your dark or lighter toned counterparts.
Usually an invasive species comes from some "other" part of the map. Through migration from their natural food source being depleted, or the threat of extinction from some other source i.e enemy. It happens it's nature taking it's course, and infuriatingly humans are apart of nature but seek to control it creating pollution, corruption with their propaganda, inciting unnecessary hate in skin tone differences. As in the human case of invasive maneuvers, if you think a aggregated division of races will ensure separation and acceleration of the different race societies you may have some legitimate points. Altogether though what makes you think your race could not become the literal "victim" of the race, or races you were trying to separate from? What makes you think your race won't seek to take advantage of another, increasing the circle of hate lessened some if not all by direct contact with the other on a daily basis by most accounts?
You have called me a cretin in your first post. Now you cynically call me a "wonderfully intelligent being that still did voice an opinion that separating people according to their skin color, which by no means is 100% the indicator of what race they really are has brought up." Calling people names can be okay, but NOT when they are asking perfectly legitimate questions and have been nothing but decent to you, you fool (see, that actually WAS okay).
That being said, I NEVER equated race with skin color, as you imply. I know full well race is NOT the same as skin color. Different races react differently to certain medicine, for example. Is that due to the color of their skin? Hell no. This little example alone demonstrates race is NOT skin color. Don't arrogantly assume you know what I know.
Your response to my question about invasive species was somewhat satisfying though. You also ask a few good questions. For that I thank you, but you need not call me names.
Very cool, very cool indeed. My tendency to be sarcastic is a very prominent. In saying I do apologize for the name throwing.
I just really would like everyone to drop the eye of difference according to tone or physical charactaristics to a vestige. As you stated we do react differently to medicines, but as humans we are one species.
Still, everyone dropping all difference according to race and skin color would still not solve for x=peace.
So theoretically I believe the separation into "zones" of "thought" would be a more feasible solution. What you like, find another who likes the exact congruence and so on. Form your group, community and higher, and live hence.
IIN I think there would be more peace if the humans were segregated?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Let me clarify, you wonderfully intelligent being that still did voice an opinion that separating people according to their skin color, which by no means is 100% the indicator of what race they really are has brought up.
Racism is a superiority complex, since "also" by no means does "skin..colour" indicate ability OR character in an individual. Also neither does genetics laughably (don't argue anyone I will not debate you on it) so by definition there is no such thing as inter-racism(New word lol). My mistake, people are hateful toward their own kind, so putting them together solves nothing. In fact more hate would be bred off of the new situation from new ideas and all sorts of lunacy. I hope you do not think your race will fly off into the sky because you have "shed" the yolks of your dark or lighter toned counterparts.
Usually an invasive species comes from some "other" part of the map. Through migration from their natural food source being depleted, or the threat of extinction from some other source i.e enemy. It happens it's nature taking it's course, and infuriatingly humans are apart of nature but seek to control it creating pollution, corruption with their propaganda, inciting unnecessary hate in skin tone differences. As in the human case of invasive maneuvers, if you think a aggregated division of races will ensure separation and acceleration of the different race societies you may have some legitimate points. Altogether though what makes you think your race could not become the literal "victim" of the race, or races you were trying to separate from? What makes you think your race won't seek to take advantage of another, increasing the circle of hate lessened some if not all by direct contact with the other on a daily basis by most accounts?
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
You have called me a cretin in your first post. Now you cynically call me a "wonderfully intelligent being that still did voice an opinion that separating people according to their skin color, which by no means is 100% the indicator of what race they really are has brought up." Calling people names can be okay, but NOT when they are asking perfectly legitimate questions and have been nothing but decent to you, you fool (see, that actually WAS okay).
That being said, I NEVER equated race with skin color, as you imply. I know full well race is NOT the same as skin color. Different races react differently to certain medicine, for example. Is that due to the color of their skin? Hell no. This little example alone demonstrates race is NOT skin color. Don't arrogantly assume you know what I know.
Your response to my question about invasive species was somewhat satisfying though. You also ask a few good questions. For that I thank you, but you need not call me names.
--
Immune2BS&way2Illuminated
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Very cool, very cool indeed. My tendency to be sarcastic is a very prominent. In saying I do apologize for the name throwing.
I just really would like everyone to drop the eye of difference according to tone or physical charactaristics to a vestige. As you stated we do react differently to medicines, but as humans we are one species.
Still, everyone dropping all difference according to race and skin color would still not solve for x=peace.
So theoretically I believe the separation into "zones" of "thought" would be a more feasible solution. What you like, find another who likes the exact congruence and so on. Form your group, community and higher, and live hence.