According to the definition I found, your messages are spam. How would you describe your repeatedly posting the same message incessantly, regardless of context and regardless of whether your opinion on the subject was asked for or not? Trolling? Preaching? Being a nuisance? As well, you are focusing on semantics rather than addressing the fact that your messages are disruptive.
"Please address any concerns that you might have, in a clear and concise manner."
You're telling me this? As I recall, YOU are the one who has been repeatedly told to be direct and precise while YOU continually resort to non-sequiturs and obfuscation. For example:
"I had help from the VHATC-L2 in writing 'the standards'.
You are most welcome in challenging the VHATC-L2, if you wish."
How does this at all address my point of your hypocrisy in labelling the government's expectation of everyone living up to their standards "a problem" when you do the same with your own standards? Unless you are suggesting that the fact that you base your standards on the VHATC-L2 somehow makes them not 'your standards' that you forcing on everyone (which, of course, is nonsense for reasons already explained), I fail to see how this is at all relevant to the conversation.
Finally, your beliefs are not well founded. I, and others, have pointed out where you are wrong and, when faced with this, you either resort to obfuscation or simply ignoring these points. And even if they were well-founded, that does not justify your spamming it everywhere. As I have said, you have degraded yourself and your beliefs by acting like a spambot, posting them over and over again until people no longer care about the message you're trying to convey and simply regard you as a common mindless troll who has nothing better to do than to simply parrot what he believes ad nauseum.
By doing this, you ensure that absolutely no one will take what you're saying seriously.
If you wish to respond to this, again, I ask that you be direct and precise. Do not resort to non-sequiturs or obfuscation. Do not expound upon your beliefs without justification. Do not ignore any points in the hopes that by ignoring them, they'll go away. If you wish to explain why I am wrong, cite exactly what part of my message you are responding to and explicitly explain the error. Normally I wouldn't directly ask for so much from someone, but you have repeatedly demonstrated that you do not know how to properly have a conversation about this. If you do not wish to follow these guidelines and are planning on resorting to the same tired tactics that I have been calling you out on, you can save both your and my time by not responding at all.
IIN I think that work permits are stupid and creates more homeless?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
According to the definition I found, your messages are spam. How would you describe your repeatedly posting the same message incessantly, regardless of context and regardless of whether your opinion on the subject was asked for or not? Trolling? Preaching? Being a nuisance? As well, you are focusing on semantics rather than addressing the fact that your messages are disruptive.
"Please address any concerns that you might have, in a clear and concise manner."
You're telling me this? As I recall, YOU are the one who has been repeatedly told to be direct and precise while YOU continually resort to non-sequiturs and obfuscation. For example:
"I had help from the VHATC-L2 in writing 'the standards'.
You are most welcome in challenging the VHATC-L2, if you wish."
How does this at all address my point of your hypocrisy in labelling the government's expectation of everyone living up to their standards "a problem" when you do the same with your own standards? Unless you are suggesting that the fact that you base your standards on the VHATC-L2 somehow makes them not 'your standards' that you forcing on everyone (which, of course, is nonsense for reasons already explained), I fail to see how this is at all relevant to the conversation.
Finally, your beliefs are not well founded. I, and others, have pointed out where you are wrong and, when faced with this, you either resort to obfuscation or simply ignoring these points. And even if they were well-founded, that does not justify your spamming it everywhere. As I have said, you have degraded yourself and your beliefs by acting like a spambot, posting them over and over again until people no longer care about the message you're trying to convey and simply regard you as a common mindless troll who has nothing better to do than to simply parrot what he believes ad nauseum.
By doing this, you ensure that absolutely no one will take what you're saying seriously.
If you wish to respond to this, again, I ask that you be direct and precise. Do not resort to non-sequiturs or obfuscation. Do not expound upon your beliefs without justification. Do not ignore any points in the hopes that by ignoring them, they'll go away. If you wish to explain why I am wrong, cite exactly what part of my message you are responding to and explicitly explain the error. Normally I wouldn't directly ask for so much from someone, but you have repeatedly demonstrated that you do not know how to properly have a conversation about this. If you do not wish to follow these guidelines and are planning on resorting to the same tired tactics that I have been calling you out on, you can save both your and my time by not responding at all.