Would you please explain to me how "a nuclear apocalypse of epic proportions" will "weeding out those that they see as "unworthy" of living". Is there a way to direct the radiation at only the "unworthy"? Pretty amazing if it can be done. And would this "nuclear apocalypse of epic proportions" not kill all animal and plant life, contaminate the air and water, on the planet, leaving the "worthy" nothing to eat, drink or breathe?
A "a nuclear apocalypse of epic proportions" will leave a seared rock that even the "worthy" couldn't survive on. Got to give your theory a bit more thought.
The illuminati has built tunnels that the rich and powerful will use to hide out in when they conduct this depopulation plan. Just look up "illuminati tunnels". They have these tunnels with the resources to last for centuries and when the earth is inhabitable again, the satan worshipping, demonically possessed illuminati politicians and corporate executives will rise from their lair and repopulate the earth
No need, it's been done.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_decay
Following a equation that I unfortunately can't paste here, it concludes "This relationship between the half-life and the decay constant shows that highly radioactive substances are quickly spent, while those that radiate weakly endure longer."
They've also got a nice picture of somebody holding a chunk of uranium-235 with just rubber gloves.
Well yes, if you are stuck in a meltdown, iodine-131 (half life 8 days) if a terrible threat. But since,
N(t) = N_0 2^{-t/t_{1/2}}, strontium-90 (half life 29 years) will nail you with long range exposure.
Is it normal I Think That The End of Days is Soon to Come?
← View full post
Would you please explain to me how "a nuclear apocalypse of epic proportions" will "weeding out those that they see as "unworthy" of living". Is there a way to direct the radiation at only the "unworthy"? Pretty amazing if it can be done. And would this "nuclear apocalypse of epic proportions" not kill all animal and plant life, contaminate the air and water, on the planet, leaving the "worthy" nothing to eat, drink or breathe?
A "a nuclear apocalypse of epic proportions" will leave a seared rock that even the "worthy" couldn't survive on. Got to give your theory a bit more thought.
--
Anonymous Post Author
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
Couman
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
The illuminati has built tunnels that the rich and powerful will use to hide out in when they conduct this depopulation plan. Just look up "illuminati tunnels". They have these tunnels with the resources to last for centuries and when the earth is inhabitable again, the satan worshipping, demonically possessed illuminati politicians and corporate executives will rise from their lair and repopulate the earth
Perhaps the worthy will hide out in vaults.
--
thegypsysailor
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
For the half-life of U-235? That's 703.8 million years!
--
Couman
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Which means it's not very radioactive. It's the short half-life stuff that you need worry about.
--
green_boogers
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Nope. Do the math, bud.
--
Couman
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
No need, it's been done.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_decay
Following a equation that I unfortunately can't paste here, it concludes "This relationship between the half-life and the decay constant shows that highly radioactive substances are quickly spent, while those that radiate weakly endure longer."
They've also got a nice picture of somebody holding a chunk of uranium-235 with just rubber gloves.
--
green_boogers
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Well yes, if you are stuck in a meltdown, iodine-131 (half life 8 days) if a terrible threat. But since,
N(t) = N_0 2^{-t/t_{1/2}}, strontium-90 (half life 29 years) will nail you with long range exposure.