I'm just pointing out that your logic seems confused. And your elaboration hardly makes things better; all women are not soft and flaky and clouded by emotions any more than men are. And to say that women are both too emotional and not empathic enough is direct contradiction.
Women and men aren't naturally different. Women and men score similarly on intelligence tests, and often women score higher. To make a distinction that women are too emotional to be leaders is just sexist. There have been plenty of female leaders in the past who have been no more irrational than male leaders. And it's not like male political leaders make rational decisions for the good of the people very often anyway :P
No-one should rule the world, but I agree that if someone has to it should be men and women in equal parts.
Is it normal i think it would be a disaster if women ruled the world?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I'm just pointing out that your logic seems confused. And your elaboration hardly makes things better; all women are not soft and flaky and clouded by emotions any more than men are. And to say that women are both too emotional and not empathic enough is direct contradiction.
Women and men aren't naturally different. Women and men score similarly on intelligence tests, and often women score higher. To make a distinction that women are too emotional to be leaders is just sexist. There have been plenty of female leaders in the past who have been no more irrational than male leaders. And it's not like male political leaders make rational decisions for the good of the people very often anyway :P
No-one should rule the world, but I agree that if someone has to it should be men and women in equal parts.