It actually doesn't effect woman more until you get to 65 years old. It effects men way more in the teen years and starts to drop a bit after that while woman stay about the same but go down a bit after teen years.
Common scientific knowledge doesn't require proof.
Only one of your links worked. Regardless, it certainly wasn't "proof" of your bullshit.
No one asked you to "prove" BPA is unsafe (see my aforementioned comment on "common scientific knowledge"). I asked you why the fuck you think you can claim it causes transgender people and why you think excess oestrogen (which this isn't, FYI, it MIMICS oestrogen effects, but of course you don't understand the subject matter) in a biological woman would make her feel that she was meant to have been a man.
I see expecting any internal coherence with you is still a long way off...
IIN I'm weirded out by transgenderism?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
It actually doesn't effect woman more until you get to 65 years old. It effects men way more in the teen years and starts to drop a bit after that while woman stay about the same but go down a bit after teen years.
--
redrainbow22
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
what estrogen? where is your source for this?
--
charli.m
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
...that would be science. Something you're clearly unfamiliar with.
--
redrainbow22
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
so you agree with him?
wheres your proof then?
you cant just expect people to believe anything without providing proof
--
charli.m
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
charli.m
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Oh, realised you embarrassed yourself and deleted the evidence?
....
Says the idiot making bizarre claims based on nothing...
--
redrainbow22
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
redrainbow22
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
https: //donate.ewg. org/images/BPA_De tectedInPeople.jpg
http: //science.howstuffworks. com/envir onmental/green-science/bpa.htm
https: //www.newscientist. com/article/2123098-bpa-fre e-water-bottles-may-contain-another-harmful-chemical/
https: //www.fastcompany. com/1677855/6-steps-to-a voiding-bpa-in-your-daily-life
they're not bizarre
and its not based on nothing, i can show you proof if you want some
but you gotta show me something your saying
--
charli.m
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Your diseased brain isn't proof, genius.
Common scientific knowledge doesn't require proof.
Only one of your links worked. Regardless, it certainly wasn't "proof" of your bullshit.
No one asked you to "prove" BPA is unsafe (see my aforementioned comment on "common scientific knowledge"). I asked you why the fuck you think you can claim it causes transgender people and why you think excess oestrogen (which this isn't, FYI, it MIMICS oestrogen effects, but of course you don't understand the subject matter) in a biological woman would make her feel that she was meant to have been a man.
I see expecting any internal coherence with you is still a long way off...