Sure you can assume that the dog did something but it was not directly mentioned or implied in the post. You are assuming the dog is at fault. So how do you know the dog did anything. If it was the dog he was mad at why does the post make it seem as though its the naibor? He never said anything like that. Also I think in most cases if a dog mauled someone they would be put down.
So please show me where in the post does the OP say the dog attacked him? It says nothing. So you assuming the dog attacked him is you making up a way to justify hurting an otherwise innocent animal. Yeah I know hitting the dog might seem fun to you but does not mean you should do it. 3 cheers for animal abuse. Yeah you are not getting any of that from here. I do not believe in torturing animals for sick kicks. you twisted assholes.
If you scroll up on this same conversation you will see where the OP mentioned being mauled. Here's a direct quote from the OP.
"My neighbor's dog mauled me 3 months ago, smartass. I have past-due medical bills and scars that these losers are so far refusing to pay for. Giving the dog diarrhea is payback. They're lucky I'm being so nice and not killing the lot of them."
Please read the entire conversation before making a judgement next time.
You only made yourself look like you dont know what we are discussing.
Also I love most animals but these kinds of occurances are unacceptable and it sounds like an out of control dog with lousy owners. Who really cares if some violent dog gets diareah and shits all over their lazy owners carpet.
In that case he should not make the dog sick. In this case he should sue them and take them to court. If it was indeed their dog that attacked them it is something they should pay for. If someone kid crashes another persons car and is under care of that person they will pay. The op did not mention this in the original post. Which would have been helpful information. However he did not so comes off as an asshole not an abused victim. Unless the dog attacked him when he was robbing them or breaking in. Which is a real defense.
Anonymous Poll Creator: "My neighbor's dog mauled me 3 months ago, smartass. I have past-due medical bills and scars that these losers are so far refusing to pay for. Giving the dog diarrhea is payback. They're lucky I'm being so nice and not killing the lot of them."
PantyElf, you need to read what people say before you start posting. If he feeds that mauling fleabag so much ExLax that it shits itself to death, he won't be doing it "for kicks," he will be doing it because the damn dog attacked him! And the result will be that the POS won't maul anyone else!
Is it normal I'm trying to give neighbor's dog diarrhea?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
You are not making a point at all because the OP was mauled by the dog. Of course the dog did something wrong. You point is pointless.
--
1000yrVampireKing
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
1000yrVampireKing
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
-
1000yrVampireKing
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Sure you can assume that the dog did something but it was not directly mentioned or implied in the post. You are assuming the dog is at fault. So how do you know the dog did anything. If it was the dog he was mad at why does the post make it seem as though its the naibor? He never said anything like that. Also I think in most cases if a dog mauled someone they would be put down.
So please show me where in the post does the OP say the dog attacked him? It says nothing. So you assuming the dog attacked him is you making up a way to justify hurting an otherwise innocent animal. Yeah I know hitting the dog might seem fun to you but does not mean you should do it. 3 cheers for animal abuse. Yeah you are not getting any of that from here. I do not believe in torturing animals for sick kicks. you twisted assholes.
--
[Old Memory]
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
Moonbow
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
If you scroll up on this same conversation you will see where the OP mentioned being mauled. Here's a direct quote from the OP.
"My neighbor's dog mauled me 3 months ago, smartass. I have past-due medical bills and scars that these losers are so far refusing to pay for. Giving the dog diarrhea is payback. They're lucky I'm being so nice and not killing the lot of them."
Please read the entire conversation before making a judgement next time.
You only made yourself look like you dont know what we are discussing.
Also I love most animals but these kinds of occurances are unacceptable and it sounds like an out of control dog with lousy owners. Who really cares if some violent dog gets diareah and shits all over their lazy owners carpet.
--
1000yrVampireKing
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
In that case he should not make the dog sick. In this case he should sue them and take them to court. If it was indeed their dog that attacked them it is something they should pay for. If someone kid crashes another persons car and is under care of that person they will pay. The op did not mention this in the original post. Which would have been helpful information. However he did not so comes off as an asshole not an abused victim. Unless the dog attacked him when he was robbing them or breaking in. Which is a real defense.
Anonymous Poll Creator: "My neighbor's dog mauled me 3 months ago, smartass. I have past-due medical bills and scars that these losers are so far refusing to pay for. Giving the dog diarrhea is payback. They're lucky I'm being so nice and not killing the lot of them."
PantyElf, you need to read what people say before you start posting. If he feeds that mauling fleabag so much ExLax that it shits itself to death, he won't be doing it "for kicks," he will be doing it because the damn dog attacked him! And the result will be that the POS won't maul anyone else!
When did the OP say the dog did anything? He simply said that his naibor pissed him off and he wanted to give his dog diarrhea.