Hmm you are another example which I forgot: A person just going with a really popular/often used argument before rather informing themselfs about the topic!
NO I'm not claiming for attention why should I (if that was the case I could've brought up another stupid story which is completely useless).
Besides thanks to lolol555 who explained what I was critizising for you.
Furthermore the argument with the consent is very irrational because an animal can consent (a mature animal)! Of course not by saying yes but they have body language to express that. In addition an animal will show discomfort if it does not like it and a "true" zoophile would stop immediately then.
To pedophilia: I never included any sexual acts I just said love... An adult can love a child just emotionally and can be sexually attracted to it but that must not include anything sexual. (same for zoophilia but there I think it would be OK to have sex with an animal which is big enough!)
For your conclusion I have to say that less than 50 years ago gays were not accepted as much as zoophiles and pedophiles were not accepted! Besides I think that zoophiles would feel offended because I grouped that with pedophiles... In addition I think the society will someday also tolerate zoophilia (probably not pedophilia but who knows) because I think there's nothing wrong with it! Furthermore I just listed some examples of what I tolerate so it does not matter if I put zoophilia, pedophilia and homosexuality together.
To draw a conclusion you should inform yourself before posting and read my story that careful so you understand what my point was!
Is it normal I'm that open-minded?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Hmm you are another example which I forgot: A person just going with a really popular/often used argument before rather informing themselfs about the topic!
NO I'm not claiming for attention why should I (if that was the case I could've brought up another stupid story which is completely useless).
Besides thanks to lolol555 who explained what I was critizising for you.
Furthermore the argument with the consent is very irrational because an animal can consent (a mature animal)! Of course not by saying yes but they have body language to express that. In addition an animal will show discomfort if it does not like it and a "true" zoophile would stop immediately then.
To pedophilia: I never included any sexual acts I just said love... An adult can love a child just emotionally and can be sexually attracted to it but that must not include anything sexual. (same for zoophilia but there I think it would be OK to have sex with an animal which is big enough!)
For your conclusion I have to say that less than 50 years ago gays were not accepted as much as zoophiles and pedophiles were not accepted! Besides I think that zoophiles would feel offended because I grouped that with pedophiles... In addition I think the society will someday also tolerate zoophilia (probably not pedophilia but who knows) because I think there's nothing wrong with it! Furthermore I just listed some examples of what I tolerate so it does not matter if I put zoophilia, pedophilia and homosexuality together.
To draw a conclusion you should inform yourself before posting and read my story that careful so you understand what my point was!