It seems like you're claiming to be so open-minded for attention or something. People don't have a problem with zoophilia, pedophilia, and incest because it's 'disgusting' (which it is, don't get me wrong) but because of the issue of CONSENT. Animals and children can't consent to sexual activity like that.
And don't let's forget to mention what an extreme psychological effect sexual abuse has on children. There's nothing "true" or "loving" about it. Maybe you should inform yourself about these topics before deciding they're acceptable?
Also I feel I have to mention that, as a gay, I find it really offensive and problematic that you group gays with those others. Not cool!
I think she was trying to say that the groups of people in society that are widely hated on and discriminated against do not bother her, and I feel the same way, Im a furry and I'm hated on some times and it's just because People are not educated on the matter before they go into rage mode she wasn't hating on gays infect see was saying she was not against you.......
If you actually could read, you would notice she/he criticized those who were against it because it was 'disgusting', which I am afraid dear sir/madam is an opinion. Not a fact, nor a rational argument against it.
Your argument against it, is indeed one that is used often. But, I believe to be open minded you need to see both sides and not stick stubbornly to one side or get too influenced by your own emotions.
Who was talking about children? A 16 year old can't consent to sexual activity? Are you mentally retarded or something? And as for animals, if they don't mind doing it and they like it why the hell not?
Anyway those are all different categories, relax douche.
Hmm you are another example which I forgot: A person just going with a really popular/often used argument before rather informing themselfs about the topic!
NO I'm not claiming for attention why should I (if that was the case I could've brought up another stupid story which is completely useless).
Besides thanks to lolol555 who explained what I was critizising for you.
Furthermore the argument with the consent is very irrational because an animal can consent (a mature animal)! Of course not by saying yes but they have body language to express that. In addition an animal will show discomfort if it does not like it and a "true" zoophile would stop immediately then.
To pedophilia: I never included any sexual acts I just said love... An adult can love a child just emotionally and can be sexually attracted to it but that must not include anything sexual. (same for zoophilia but there I think it would be OK to have sex with an animal which is big enough!)
For your conclusion I have to say that less than 50 years ago gays were not accepted as much as zoophiles and pedophiles were not accepted! Besides I think that zoophiles would feel offended because I grouped that with pedophiles... In addition I think the society will someday also tolerate zoophilia (probably not pedophilia but who knows) because I think there's nothing wrong with it! Furthermore I just listed some examples of what I tolerate so it does not matter if I put zoophilia, pedophilia and homosexuality together.
To draw a conclusion you should inform yourself before posting and read my story that careful so you understand what my point was!
Is it normal I'm that open-minded?
← View full post
It seems like you're claiming to be so open-minded for attention or something. People don't have a problem with zoophilia, pedophilia, and incest because it's 'disgusting' (which it is, don't get me wrong) but because of the issue of CONSENT. Animals and children can't consent to sexual activity like that.
And don't let's forget to mention what an extreme psychological effect sexual abuse has on children. There's nothing "true" or "loving" about it. Maybe you should inform yourself about these topics before deciding they're acceptable?
Also I feel I have to mention that, as a gay, I find it really offensive and problematic that you group gays with those others. Not cool!
--
River710
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
lolol555
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
LightningTechnician
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
DolphinAngel
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-2
-2
I think she was trying to say that the groups of people in society that are widely hated on and discriminated against do not bother her, and I feel the same way, Im a furry and I'm hated on some times and it's just because People are not educated on the matter before they go into rage mode she wasn't hating on gays infect see was saying she was not against you.......
--
DolphinAngel
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
I'm a guy but other than that you are correct
--
River710
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Oh sorry
If you actually could read, you would notice she/he criticized those who were against it because it was 'disgusting', which I am afraid dear sir/madam is an opinion. Not a fact, nor a rational argument against it.
Your argument against it, is indeed one that is used often. But, I believe to be open minded you need to see both sides and not stick stubbornly to one side or get too influenced by your own emotions.
Who was talking about children? A 16 year old can't consent to sexual activity? Are you mentally retarded or something? And as for animals, if they don't mind doing it and they like it why the hell not?
Anyway those are all different categories, relax douche.
--
DolphinAngel
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
a 16 yo is a teenager... he/she was referring to children under 13
Hmm you are another example which I forgot: A person just going with a really popular/often used argument before rather informing themselfs about the topic!
NO I'm not claiming for attention why should I (if that was the case I could've brought up another stupid story which is completely useless).
Besides thanks to lolol555 who explained what I was critizising for you.
Furthermore the argument with the consent is very irrational because an animal can consent (a mature animal)! Of course not by saying yes but they have body language to express that. In addition an animal will show discomfort if it does not like it and a "true" zoophile would stop immediately then.
To pedophilia: I never included any sexual acts I just said love... An adult can love a child just emotionally and can be sexually attracted to it but that must not include anything sexual. (same for zoophilia but there I think it would be OK to have sex with an animal which is big enough!)
For your conclusion I have to say that less than 50 years ago gays were not accepted as much as zoophiles and pedophiles were not accepted! Besides I think that zoophiles would feel offended because I grouped that with pedophiles... In addition I think the society will someday also tolerate zoophilia (probably not pedophilia but who knows) because I think there's nothing wrong with it! Furthermore I just listed some examples of what I tolerate so it does not matter if I put zoophilia, pedophilia and homosexuality together.
To draw a conclusion you should inform yourself before posting and read my story that careful so you understand what my point was!