Not everyone can explain themselves perfectly all the time. Sometimes people have problems trying to explain what they mean. It does not mean what they think is any less relevant. They simply need better presentation skills. Now I don't claim to be able to read the OP mind or anything but from what I read I don't think they were trying to say it doesn't exist. Though classifying bisexuality itself as a fetish is debatable.
I can see that, especially when that's also what they said in their opening post - that they don't think bisexuality is a real sexuality. My willingness to give the benefit of the doubt just doesn't go as far as yours apparently. Judging from how all over the place their statements are, including being at opposite ends to each other, I think the doubt here can be better explained by the OP not really giving this much thought before they made their judgement. Sadly, that error is all too common. Hopefully they are rectifying that by thinking about it a lot as they read all the replies they're getting.
IIN I don't believe in Bi-sexuality?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Not everyone can explain themselves perfectly all the time. Sometimes people have problems trying to explain what they mean. It does not mean what they think is any less relevant. They simply need better presentation skills. Now I don't claim to be able to read the OP mind or anything but from what I read I don't think they were trying to say it doesn't exist. Though classifying bisexuality itself as a fetish is debatable.
--
Maere
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
"Now I don't claim to be able to read the OP mind or anything but from what I read I don't think they were trying to say it doesn't exist."
So what do you think this means then?
"I just believe it's fake..."
and from their opening post:
"I just think it doesn't exist."
So why do you not think they were trying to say it doesn't exist when they said those exact words?
--
Riddler
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Since they classified it as a "fetish". Meaning they are trying to reclassify it. Better put might be "It does not exist as a sexuality".
--
Maere
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I can see that, especially when that's also what they said in their opening post - that they don't think bisexuality is a real sexuality. My willingness to give the benefit of the doubt just doesn't go as far as yours apparently. Judging from how all over the place their statements are, including being at opposite ends to each other, I think the doubt here can be better explained by the OP not really giving this much thought before they made their judgement. Sadly, that error is all too common. Hopefully they are rectifying that by thinking about it a lot as they read all the replies they're getting.