I'm not going to argue this. If you don't want to acknowledge the validity of neo-natal neurology as an objective science as opposed to religious opinion then it can't be helped.
I acknowledge neo natal neurology as a science, im sure there are 1 or 2 people in the world studying this (cannot be more with so little utility?) but they cannot determine whether a fetus experiences cravings, they can only make an educated guess.
"im sure there are 1 or 2 people in the world studying this"
Ah, so I take it that science doesn't interest you much, otherwise you'd be well aware that neo-natal neurology isn't exactly a new or unpopular science.
"but they cannot determine whether a fetus experiences cravings, they can only make an educated guess."
Which is a hell of a lot better than a religious scholar can do. I'll give you a hint, one of them has tangible evidence, the other has doctrine written by questionable sources, thousands of years ago.
Dont you think its a bit early in our development to be ruling things out, we were throwing spears at each other a few thousand years ago, and know we think we know it all due to a few hundred years of scientific experimentation.
Is it normal for each planet with life to have a son god visit it?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Sorry but the only entity that can truly know if a fetus has cravings is the fetus.
What empirical test could be performed to establish if the fetus had a craving?
So your question is the same as mine, you want subjective opinion from people who know about the field.
I am sure religious scholars have contemplated god and the wider universe, possibility of life on other planets and have an opinion.
--
NeuroNeptunian
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I'm not going to argue this. If you don't want to acknowledge the validity of neo-natal neurology as an objective science as opposed to religious opinion then it can't be helped.
--
TonybigCock
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I acknowledge neo natal neurology as a science, im sure there are 1 or 2 people in the world studying this (cannot be more with so little utility?) but they cannot determine whether a fetus experiences cravings, they can only make an educated guess.
--
NeuroNeptunian
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
"im sure there are 1 or 2 people in the world studying this"
Ah, so I take it that science doesn't interest you much, otherwise you'd be well aware that neo-natal neurology isn't exactly a new or unpopular science.
"but they cannot determine whether a fetus experiences cravings, they can only make an educated guess."
Which is a hell of a lot better than a religious scholar can do. I'll give you a hint, one of them has tangible evidence, the other has doctrine written by questionable sources, thousands of years ago.
--
TonybigCock
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Dont you think its a bit early in our development to be ruling things out, we were throwing spears at each other a few thousand years ago, and know we think we know it all due to a few hundred years of scientific experimentation.