A pregnant women could have answered it from experience. Someone with familiarity with neo-natal neurology could have answered it from scientific knowledge. Sorry if you're unfamiliar with these concepts but that doesn't make that question any less valid.
However, there is no objective authority capable of verifying the normal/abnormal quality of this question with any degree of certainty. Takes some thinking to figure out, but I'm assuming you can accomplish it.
I'm not going to argue this. If you don't want to acknowledge the validity of neo-natal neurology as an objective science as opposed to religious opinion then it can't be helped.
I acknowledge neo natal neurology as a science, im sure there are 1 or 2 people in the world studying this (cannot be more with so little utility?) but they cannot determine whether a fetus experiences cravings, they can only make an educated guess.
"im sure there are 1 or 2 people in the world studying this"
Ah, so I take it that science doesn't interest you much, otherwise you'd be well aware that neo-natal neurology isn't exactly a new or unpopular science.
"but they cannot determine whether a fetus experiences cravings, they can only make an educated guess."
Which is a hell of a lot better than a religious scholar can do. I'll give you a hint, one of them has tangible evidence, the other has doctrine written by questionable sources, thousands of years ago.
Dont you think its a bit early in our development to be ruling things out, we were throwing spears at each other a few thousand years ago, and know we think we know it all due to a few hundred years of scientific experimentation.
Is it normal for each planet with life to have a son god visit it?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
A pregnant women could have answered it from experience. Someone with familiarity with neo-natal neurology could have answered it from scientific knowledge. Sorry if you're unfamiliar with these concepts but that doesn't make that question any less valid.
However, there is no objective authority capable of verifying the normal/abnormal quality of this question with any degree of certainty. Takes some thinking to figure out, but I'm assuming you can accomplish it.
--
TonybigCock
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Sorry but the only entity that can truly know if a fetus has cravings is the fetus.
What empirical test could be performed to establish if the fetus had a craving?
So your question is the same as mine, you want subjective opinion from people who know about the field.
I am sure religious scholars have contemplated god and the wider universe, possibility of life on other planets and have an opinion.
--
NeuroNeptunian
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I'm not going to argue this. If you don't want to acknowledge the validity of neo-natal neurology as an objective science as opposed to religious opinion then it can't be helped.
--
TonybigCock
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I acknowledge neo natal neurology as a science, im sure there are 1 or 2 people in the world studying this (cannot be more with so little utility?) but they cannot determine whether a fetus experiences cravings, they can only make an educated guess.
--
NeuroNeptunian
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
"im sure there are 1 or 2 people in the world studying this"
Ah, so I take it that science doesn't interest you much, otherwise you'd be well aware that neo-natal neurology isn't exactly a new or unpopular science.
"but they cannot determine whether a fetus experiences cravings, they can only make an educated guess."
Which is a hell of a lot better than a religious scholar can do. I'll give you a hint, one of them has tangible evidence, the other has doctrine written by questionable sources, thousands of years ago.
--
TonybigCock
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Dont you think its a bit early in our development to be ruling things out, we were throwing spears at each other a few thousand years ago, and know we think we know it all due to a few hundred years of scientific experimentation.