"They cling to contemporary science like a srecurity blanket; always safe in the knowledge that what they belive are facts."
Not just the Athist but many theists go by contemporary science too (we all do). We may not know everything, but you know what? We love that we don't know everything. This is what gives us our creativity. Theorys of how things work in the univers, is nothing but creativity. We just rule out theorys with what we know to be scientific fact so far. Yes things will change, but until then, we have to go by what we know. An Atheist is NOT told what to belive. Just don't belive in paranormal/gods and you automaticly get the tag. Anything you belive after that is entirely up to you. The day a scientist prooves something wrong, no matter what, it's a good day. Because, "now" we know.
"They (generally) tend to rely on science for their outlook on existence and generally reject things which are not prooved."
In some ways you are right. But to say no one hase prooved it dosn't meen it can't be prooved. This is when I usely ask the person: "Why don't you proove it?"
Not to be taken the wrong way, but to be take seriously as a sugetion that you and/or anyone else could proove something right or wrong. How to proove? Scientific method. We all go by it, because it's the best we have so far.
My opinion was not that of every Atheist, just me.
Is it normal for atheists to always act so conceited?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
"They cling to contemporary science like a srecurity blanket; always safe in the knowledge that what they belive are facts."
Not just the Athist but many theists go by contemporary science too (we all do). We may not know everything, but you know what? We love that we don't know everything. This is what gives us our creativity. Theorys of how things work in the univers, is nothing but creativity. We just rule out theorys with what we know to be scientific fact so far. Yes things will change, but until then, we have to go by what we know. An Atheist is NOT told what to belive. Just don't belive in paranormal/gods and you automaticly get the tag. Anything you belive after that is entirely up to you. The day a scientist prooves something wrong, no matter what, it's a good day. Because, "now" we know.
"They (generally) tend to rely on science for their outlook on existence and generally reject things which are not prooved."
In some ways you are right. But to say no one hase prooved it dosn't meen it can't be prooved. This is when I usely ask the person: "Why don't you proove it?"
Not to be taken the wrong way, but to be take seriously as a sugetion that you and/or anyone else could proove something right or wrong. How to proove? Scientific method. We all go by it, because it's the best we have so far.
My opinion was not that of every Atheist, just me.