Ah, ofcourse. If anyone holds you to your "equality" then they are simply keyboard warriors. This is why I can't take women seriously.
If you cannot understand that statement, then I am baffled. You are brain dead.
Yes, I am a woman hater, and rightfully so. I will not disrespect a woman for no reason, although she will have to prove herself that she is not among the majority of what women are nowadays before I start to like her. This is a result of how women like yourself are just filled with idiocy, that women have to prove themselves to me before I can take them seriously. A hell of a lot of proving.
Yes, women are stupid. The amount of women I have debated with on here and in other places show that women just can't grasp rationality. Yes, there are some, and I like those ones, but the average woman, in my experience, just can't grasp rationality.
Not all women have it, most do. You included. "I can hit you, but you are not allowed to do anything about it". Princess mentality. You want to do things at others expense, then think it's wrong if they have anything to say about it. Again. Princess mentality.
Lol. When you then say "I know I don't". Hilarious. Yes, love, you very much do. No, princess mentality women will never admit to it. I gave a fine example of you having a princess mentality. Sorry, but when debating with me, don't expect to have your cake and eat it, too. Just doesn't work that way.
Ah, once again. A lovely sense of the princess mentality. "It can't be us females that have given you a rational reason to dislike us, it must be because you were rejected, etc". Again. Princess mentality.
Listen, princess. When it comes to the rejection ratio, I have rejected far more. I have not even asked a female to be my partner, nor do I ever plan to until I want a child, if even then.
You're talking to the guy that went out with a female for a skateboard, then broke up with them after it broke. Believe me, hunny, your gender may be wanted by countless men, but not me. Get over yourselves. You have actual reasons to be disliked.
Funny? They were never supposed to be.
Ah, if I do not agree that rainbows shine out of your asses, I need to grow some balls, right?
My God. You're relatively new here. Perhaps a few months? You should know by now that you need more than princess mentality to beat me in a debate, love. Quite frankly, you don't have it in you.
It's quite obvious that you spend so much time at home that you weren't given the chance to get to know real people beyond your computer screen. Generalizing and stereotyping are poor arguments, you god of debates. Women are stupid just because you say so? That's what you think and that's subjective. You are on your right to hate females if you want it so bad, it is your problem if you lose the opportunity of getting to know people just because your closed mind.
By the way, your mom can't be very happy with a son who thinks she's a fucking stupid airhead.
It's quite obvious, is it? I have moved to so many places, met so many different people because of the life style I lived of moving around. In every area (except this one, been here for half a year and starting college soon), I have made plenty of friends, and I tend to know far more people in one area than others. So when you add that up with all the other people in different areas I have lived, I would only assume I know far more people than you do.
Don't try to make things personal, it is petty and irrational. It saves me from having to point out that your assumptions are wrong, and assumptions on someones personal life has nowhere in rational debate.
You would do well to remember that.
This is not generalization out of nothing. I have observed. Like I said, I move around a lot in my life and observe people and interact with them.
The majority of women I talk to tend to be idiots. Some impress me, and one of them on here is my favorite user. We do what I base my judgement on women on other areas of life so much. If we are trying to figure out something between two certain things, we take a select few, then we base our research on what those select few do, have, etc compared to the other data collected.
When we are figuring out something between two types, let's say humans (blacks, whites, asians, female, male, do we study 'every' one in one of those groups, or do we observe the most we can? If the vast majority of our data shows a certain pattern, that is what we conclude. As a species.
Again, if you need this explained, I am baffled.
What I love with manginas and women is this whole "you have bad arguments" thing...Ok. I have bad arguments. I will accept this, if you can prove it. Asking manginas and prove that the person they say has bad arguments actually has bad arguments is like kryptonite to them.
You really need it explained you need to give reason and points instead of just stating something? Could you imagine the world we would live in if we went by that rationality?
"I seen a flying pig."
- "Really? I don't need to ask for proof, your statement about it is enough to show me you are right".
That is all I see when someone 'states' I have bad arguments without actually proving it.
Women are stupid because I said so? Where did I say that? Where did I say "I just think women are stupid"?
Is that your tactic? Can't counter anything I actually say, and so have to just make up things and claim I said them? And you say 'I' have bad arguments?
I said I have observed this, I have witnissed this, and I have experienced their idiocy.
Being that I used to be a feminist myself, I know from both ends of the road on this subject and not just coming to a conclusion on this from one area of life.
Like I said. I hate women, but I clearly implied that I am open to a woman showing me she is different. I have had many female friends, if not slightly more female friends. I know there are good women out there, but in general I have seen there aren't much.
I do not hate my mother. She has done a lot for me and my family since I was a child.
Do you have any basis for an argument other than this princess mentality thing. My brain is quite alive, don't twist my words, Familiar with the term Never argue with a fool otherwise people will not know the difference.you're the fool not me (just to be clear) peter out.
1. Not mentioning the princess mentality at all, saying how you call people a keyboard warrior because someone dares speak their opinion on the opposite side of things to you.
2. I mentioned how you could not understand something so simple.
3. I mention how I no longer take women seriously at the start, and that they have to prove that they are not like the majority of females before I take them seriously.
4. I mention how the majority of women I speak to can't grasp rationality. (How you responded to my previous reply just proves it).
5. Princess mentality involved.
6. Princess mentality involved.
7. I call you princess, not mentioning the princess mentality. I explain how you're assumption to try to belittle me is a bad way to go given that I have had many women interested in me.
8. The 'funny' part.
9. I imply that you are implying that if sombody dares mention any flaw your gender has, then they need to "grow some balls".
10. I mention how stupid it was of you to try debate with me due to you lacking rationality.
Ok. So let me get this straight. Out of ten points/paragraphs, I only mention the princess mentality 'twice', yet "the princess mentality thing is all I have"? Again, you do nothing but prove my point.
So yes, I have a lot of basis, simply because you choose not to acknowledge them because you can't answer them does not mean they are not there. Sorry, when it comes to debating with me, you don't get to avoid points and be seen as a rational being aswell. Doesn't work that way.
Twisting your words? I am not twisting your words at all. I mentioned the inintentionally implied parts of your words. There is a difference. I don't expect you to understand that, though. Again, I don't give you that much credit. But please do show me where I 'twisted your words'.
Ah, ofcourse. So you expect me to take you seriously, and you think you are the one 'winning' (no other way to describe it) this debate, yet all you have here is "You are wrong because I said so. You stupid. You stupid, because I said so".
Let me get this straight. I make ten points, you can't answer any of them, you then make an excuse that is not at all valid and would only account for two of my points out of ten, still not answering any, then expect people to think you are the rational one here?
Maybe this comes as a shock to you (no surprise), but in order to win a debate, you have to address your points 'and' the opposing debater's points. You have not been able to defend your own, or show mine wrong, and your response shows that. Where as me? I back up my points and prove yours wrong.
Now, don't get me wrong, I know how you will respond. "You didn't prove my points wrong", and you will give no reason to suggest the reasons I said your points are wrong, as wrong. Yet you will still expect to be taken seriously.
"You're stupid. I win because I said so". Get your stupid school-yard antics out of here. You have to be atleast average in rationality to compete with the IIN community, let alone me.
hahahahaha I have no rationality to compete with the IIN community? is this a place to compete for anything, don't think so, log off of the Internet silly boy.
Insult, insult, insult. Is that all? Have nothing to offer to the debate?
No, this is a place for advice and debate. Debating is the point of proving one right, and the other wrong. So yes, when debate is involved you are aiming to win.
Do you not understand the basis of debate?
And you finnish with another insult.
Listen, chum. When a little girl is too devoid of reasoning and rationality to answer simple questions, do you think I am going to take what she says at heart? You are telling me to "Log off the internet", when the internet is not a place for you. You do not have the rationality to comment in places other than Youtube videos.
Again, I'm a silly boy? This silly boy just demolished you with rationality. I have never claimed to be a genius, but if I am silly, then what does that say about you? You just basically insulted yourself.
Is it normal for a guy to be willing to hit a girl?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Ah, ofcourse. If anyone holds you to your "equality" then they are simply keyboard warriors. This is why I can't take women seriously.
If you cannot understand that statement, then I am baffled. You are brain dead.
Yes, I am a woman hater, and rightfully so. I will not disrespect a woman for no reason, although she will have to prove herself that she is not among the majority of what women are nowadays before I start to like her. This is a result of how women like yourself are just filled with idiocy, that women have to prove themselves to me before I can take them seriously. A hell of a lot of proving.
Yes, women are stupid. The amount of women I have debated with on here and in other places show that women just can't grasp rationality. Yes, there are some, and I like those ones, but the average woman, in my experience, just can't grasp rationality.
Not all women have it, most do. You included. "I can hit you, but you are not allowed to do anything about it". Princess mentality. You want to do things at others expense, then think it's wrong if they have anything to say about it. Again. Princess mentality.
Lol. When you then say "I know I don't". Hilarious. Yes, love, you very much do. No, princess mentality women will never admit to it. I gave a fine example of you having a princess mentality. Sorry, but when debating with me, don't expect to have your cake and eat it, too. Just doesn't work that way.
Ah, once again. A lovely sense of the princess mentality. "It can't be us females that have given you a rational reason to dislike us, it must be because you were rejected, etc". Again. Princess mentality.
Listen, princess. When it comes to the rejection ratio, I have rejected far more. I have not even asked a female to be my partner, nor do I ever plan to until I want a child, if even then.
You're talking to the guy that went out with a female for a skateboard, then broke up with them after it broke. Believe me, hunny, your gender may be wanted by countless men, but not me. Get over yourselves. You have actual reasons to be disliked.
Funny? They were never supposed to be.
Ah, if I do not agree that rainbows shine out of your asses, I need to grow some balls, right?
My God. You're relatively new here. Perhaps a few months? You should know by now that you need more than princess mentality to beat me in a debate, love. Quite frankly, you don't have it in you.
--
Bel101
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
CheyChey
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
It's quite obvious that you spend so much time at home that you weren't given the chance to get to know real people beyond your computer screen. Generalizing and stereotyping are poor arguments, you god of debates. Women are stupid just because you say so? That's what you think and that's subjective. You are on your right to hate females if you want it so bad, it is your problem if you lose the opportunity of getting to know people just because your closed mind.
By the way, your mom can't be very happy with a son who thinks she's a fucking stupid airhead.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
It's quite obvious, is it? I have moved to so many places, met so many different people because of the life style I lived of moving around. In every area (except this one, been here for half a year and starting college soon), I have made plenty of friends, and I tend to know far more people in one area than others. So when you add that up with all the other people in different areas I have lived, I would only assume I know far more people than you do.
Don't try to make things personal, it is petty and irrational. It saves me from having to point out that your assumptions are wrong, and assumptions on someones personal life has nowhere in rational debate.
You would do well to remember that.
This is not generalization out of nothing. I have observed. Like I said, I move around a lot in my life and observe people and interact with them.
The majority of women I talk to tend to be idiots. Some impress me, and one of them on here is my favorite user. We do what I base my judgement on women on other areas of life so much. If we are trying to figure out something between two certain things, we take a select few, then we base our research on what those select few do, have, etc compared to the other data collected.
When we are figuring out something between two types, let's say humans (blacks, whites, asians, female, male, do we study 'every' one in one of those groups, or do we observe the most we can? If the vast majority of our data shows a certain pattern, that is what we conclude. As a species.
Again, if you need this explained, I am baffled.
What I love with manginas and women is this whole "you have bad arguments" thing...Ok. I have bad arguments. I will accept this, if you can prove it. Asking manginas and prove that the person they say has bad arguments actually has bad arguments is like kryptonite to them.
You really need it explained you need to give reason and points instead of just stating something? Could you imagine the world we would live in if we went by that rationality?
"I seen a flying pig."
- "Really? I don't need to ask for proof, your statement about it is enough to show me you are right".
That is all I see when someone 'states' I have bad arguments without actually proving it.
Women are stupid because I said so? Where did I say that? Where did I say "I just think women are stupid"?
Is that your tactic? Can't counter anything I actually say, and so have to just make up things and claim I said them? And you say 'I' have bad arguments?
I said I have observed this, I have witnissed this, and I have experienced their idiocy.
Being that I used to be a feminist myself, I know from both ends of the road on this subject and not just coming to a conclusion on this from one area of life.
Like I said. I hate women, but I clearly implied that I am open to a woman showing me she is different. I have had many female friends, if not slightly more female friends. I know there are good women out there, but in general I have seen there aren't much.
I do not hate my mother. She has done a lot for me and my family since I was a child.
Do you have any basis for an argument other than this princess mentality thing. My brain is quite alive, don't twist my words, Familiar with the term Never argue with a fool otherwise people will not know the difference.you're the fool not me (just to be clear) peter out.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Oh, ofcourse, princess.
Let me go through my paragraphs.
1. Not mentioning the princess mentality at all, saying how you call people a keyboard warrior because someone dares speak their opinion on the opposite side of things to you.
2. I mentioned how you could not understand something so simple.
3. I mention how I no longer take women seriously at the start, and that they have to prove that they are not like the majority of females before I take them seriously.
4. I mention how the majority of women I speak to can't grasp rationality. (How you responded to my previous reply just proves it).
5. Princess mentality involved.
6. Princess mentality involved.
7. I call you princess, not mentioning the princess mentality. I explain how you're assumption to try to belittle me is a bad way to go given that I have had many women interested in me.
8. The 'funny' part.
9. I imply that you are implying that if sombody dares mention any flaw your gender has, then they need to "grow some balls".
10. I mention how stupid it was of you to try debate with me due to you lacking rationality.
Ok. So let me get this straight. Out of ten points/paragraphs, I only mention the princess mentality 'twice', yet "the princess mentality thing is all I have"? Again, you do nothing but prove my point.
So yes, I have a lot of basis, simply because you choose not to acknowledge them because you can't answer them does not mean they are not there. Sorry, when it comes to debating with me, you don't get to avoid points and be seen as a rational being aswell. Doesn't work that way.
Twisting your words? I am not twisting your words at all. I mentioned the inintentionally implied parts of your words. There is a difference. I don't expect you to understand that, though. Again, I don't give you that much credit. But please do show me where I 'twisted your words'.
Ah, ofcourse. So you expect me to take you seriously, and you think you are the one 'winning' (no other way to describe it) this debate, yet all you have here is "You are wrong because I said so. You stupid. You stupid, because I said so".
Let me get this straight. I make ten points, you can't answer any of them, you then make an excuse that is not at all valid and would only account for two of my points out of ten, still not answering any, then expect people to think you are the rational one here?
Maybe this comes as a shock to you (no surprise), but in order to win a debate, you have to address your points 'and' the opposing debater's points. You have not been able to defend your own, or show mine wrong, and your response shows that. Where as me? I back up my points and prove yours wrong.
Now, don't get me wrong, I know how you will respond. "You didn't prove my points wrong", and you will give no reason to suggest the reasons I said your points are wrong, as wrong. Yet you will still expect to be taken seriously.
"You're stupid. I win because I said so". Get your stupid school-yard antics out of here. You have to be atleast average in rationality to compete with the IIN community, let alone me.
--
CheyChey
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
hahahahaha I have no rationality to compete with the IIN community? is this a place to compete for anything, don't think so, log off of the Internet silly boy.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Insult, insult, insult. Is that all? Have nothing to offer to the debate?
No, this is a place for advice and debate. Debating is the point of proving one right, and the other wrong. So yes, when debate is involved you are aiming to win.
Do you not understand the basis of debate?
And you finnish with another insult.
Listen, chum. When a little girl is too devoid of reasoning and rationality to answer simple questions, do you think I am going to take what she says at heart? You are telling me to "Log off the internet", when the internet is not a place for you. You do not have the rationality to comment in places other than Youtube videos.
Again, I'm a silly boy? This silly boy just demolished you with rationality. I have never claimed to be a genius, but if I am silly, then what does that say about you? You just basically insulted yourself.