Hey. Would love to mention this. But. Erm. Go fuck yourself?
If you want equality, then you get equality. Why should we not be allowed to use our strength simply because we're stronger? Doesn't that kind of defeat the whole purpose of having strength?
So basically you believe that you should allow women to hit men without any retaliation?
"Oh no, please don't hold me so I can't hit you, that will teach me such a huge lesson on why I shouldn't hit people".
You are sexist. You want to be treated equal without any of the negatives.
If you are stupid to hit someone stronger than you, then you deal with the consequences of that bigger thing hitting you back.
Fuck. Women are stupid. You expect the lion not to eat you when you poke at it. That's how stupid anyone with this "Don't hit girls" mentality is.
I thought male strength was something to protect men, not something that protects the one hurting the man. Quite funny how the one that gets the benefit of men being stronger is women, isn't it?
If you are stupid to hit something bigger, then you have to deal with it.
By your rationality, if someone weaker than another man hits a man, that man has no right to hit back?
Fuck. Women and their princess mentality. "I can do this, but you are not allowed to do anything about it. I'm such a little princess that expects to have all of the choice men have, yet none of the responsibility" Boo fucking hoo.
You're a fine example of why I am bordering on hating women as a whole.
Female who agrees. Preferrably you shouldn't hit anyone, but really? Someone hits me first, you know damn well I'm going to defend myself.
Though I probably would pull my punches a little if it was someone significantly smaller or weaker than me, and I wouldnt hit a child. I'm not a very violent person and I'm certainly not looking to break anyone. :P
I see you are comparing humans to animals. I think that most of us humans are developed enough as beings to rely on mental skills rather than physical strength. A fully rational human should never use violence in order to solve a conflict. So, a woman hasn't the right to hit a man, and an attacked man can defend himself, which is very different from actually attacking her in turn.
Pitifully, some people don't dare to resign the use of the strength of their muscles because that's the only thing they have.
If you are a human and therefore just another animal, why don't you get rid of your computer, TV, cell phone, car, clothes, burn your books and go to live to the forest?
humans can draw a line between self defense and a point where it becomes just beating an attacker when you're in control. It can happen when you're fighting a weaker opponent.
Following your former statement, does the fact that man is rational make him less of an animal?
So, you're saying that because we are more rational than other animals to the point of being able to not fight back, that makes us non animals instead of justr an animal with new understanding? You are trying to put morality before biology.
Because man is rational, that makes him less of an animal? Well let's see. There are plenty of intelligent animals out there. Simply because they are more intelligent/rational than the others, that must mean they are not animals either, correct? For example. There are apes than can sign language. That must means Apes are not animals, because the only other animal that can do that are humans, and they aren't animals to you.
Is everything black and white for you? Yes we try to use our intellect to overcome our nature, but we must never forget that we are animals. And I would love to live closer to nature, but because of school I'm kind of stuck in apartments for the time being. :/
My point is that people have to accept that we are still animals, we have to understand that side of us as well because it is there, and if you repress it in the wrong ways it can jump out when you don't want it to.
Point still stands, you really shouldn't have to hit people, but if it's in self defense? Maybe it's because of my own history, but it is what it is. I've been a victim before, I won't be again. I'm sure most people, if needed, would defend themselves or their loved ones if given no other choice.
Of course we would. I mean, you can try to use your strength to keep your attacker from moving, especially if you're stronger. What isn't fair to do is smacking them till you get tired of it taking advantage of your physical superiority. That's self defense no more, that's ATTACKING for the sake of dirty revenge. Most humans are intellectually developed enough to handle such a situation in a fair way to both parts.
Humans are on a higher intellectual level than animals. That's what makes us different from them and makes people considered better than animals. Whether we're considered animals or not doesn't change what and who we are. A rose by any other name would smell as sweet.
You dumb, fucking retard! Would you hit a 5-year-old girl that hit you, or a 90-year-old woman? After all, they're your equals.
There is more than one way to deal with a woman who hits you and the best way is to get your ass out of there pronto and don't go back!
If you don't change your way of thinking, you're going to end up in prison around some men that are going to make you whimper like a little girl as they take turns with you and it will serve you right, Asshole!
I love the irony. You call me an idiot while making a completely idiotic statement. So now you are comparing average aged women to children and old people? Do I have to spoon feed women aswell? Afterall, we are comparing them to children.
No, I would not hit a five year old simply because she is a girl, I wouldn't hit a five year old at all, nor a 90 year old. Can't believe you would compare women to five year olds and people at an age of dependance due to old age. All you done there in your foolish attempt to prove me wrong is make yourself look like a moron.
Oh, I see. Best thing to do is just let someone hit you. Ok. Next time anyone hits you, even in 'your' home, then you should not retaliate. What? It's your mentality, not mine. So what does this woman learn from...Oh, nothing happening to her after hitting someone? "Oh my God! The man I hit just left the room! I so go taught my lesson why I shouldn't hit others".
You're a smart one, ain't you.
Oh, I see. So if 'I' retaliate to a woman hitting me 'I' am the one to be punished? Oh, I see. Don't worry, chum. What I would serve in prison would be far more better that being a brain-dead mangina like yourself (assuming you are a man, if not, surprised - sarcasm).
Oh? So you are saying if a man hits a woman, he deserves to be raped? Is that what you're saying? So in the same sense, if a woman hit a man, she should be raped, and she would deserve it, right?
Fuck. I would ask you to get a clue, but you lack any brain cells to accurately comment without contradicting yourself.
You need a brain to try debate with me, love. You lack one.
Just a heads up: This particular person you're commenting to is literally just trying to start shit. They never have any logic behind what they say and they've only left negative comments on IIN.
Not worth your time.
On a side note: I had a dream about IIN last night and you were in it. You went and got yourself a girlfriend. You two were very much happy. It was nice. =)
And Charli.m ate too much peanut butter.
Go fuck myself? You go fuck yourself. what's with all the hostility trying to be the keyboard warrior? You said "Why should we not be allowed to use our strength simply because we're stronger" are you taking the piss because that statement does not make any sense so to prove this strength you beat up a woman provoked or not it's wrong. I'm sexist? No I'm not you're a macho chauvinistic pig. "Women are stupid"? and men aren't? stupidity has nothing to do with gender. Princess mentality where did this come from not all women have that mentality I know I don't that shit is wack anyways. I think your issue here you are angry at the whole female populace I bet some "princess" fucked you over and you're in that I fucking hate women phase get over it, it's pathetic. Or maybe every woman rejects you so the only thing for you to do is to hate them cognitive dissonance? These ridiculous beliefs you have are so embedded in your brain it's not even funny, A paradigm shift is what you need after you grow some balls
Ah, ofcourse. If anyone holds you to your "equality" then they are simply keyboard warriors. This is why I can't take women seriously.
If you cannot understand that statement, then I am baffled. You are brain dead.
Yes, I am a woman hater, and rightfully so. I will not disrespect a woman for no reason, although she will have to prove herself that she is not among the majority of what women are nowadays before I start to like her. This is a result of how women like yourself are just filled with idiocy, that women have to prove themselves to me before I can take them seriously. A hell of a lot of proving.
Yes, women are stupid. The amount of women I have debated with on here and in other places show that women just can't grasp rationality. Yes, there are some, and I like those ones, but the average woman, in my experience, just can't grasp rationality.
Not all women have it, most do. You included. "I can hit you, but you are not allowed to do anything about it". Princess mentality. You want to do things at others expense, then think it's wrong if they have anything to say about it. Again. Princess mentality.
Lol. When you then say "I know I don't". Hilarious. Yes, love, you very much do. No, princess mentality women will never admit to it. I gave a fine example of you having a princess mentality. Sorry, but when debating with me, don't expect to have your cake and eat it, too. Just doesn't work that way.
Ah, once again. A lovely sense of the princess mentality. "It can't be us females that have given you a rational reason to dislike us, it must be because you were rejected, etc". Again. Princess mentality.
Listen, princess. When it comes to the rejection ratio, I have rejected far more. I have not even asked a female to be my partner, nor do I ever plan to until I want a child, if even then.
You're talking to the guy that went out with a female for a skateboard, then broke up with them after it broke. Believe me, hunny, your gender may be wanted by countless men, but not me. Get over yourselves. You have actual reasons to be disliked.
Funny? They were never supposed to be.
Ah, if I do not agree that rainbows shine out of your asses, I need to grow some balls, right?
My God. You're relatively new here. Perhaps a few months? You should know by now that you need more than princess mentality to beat me in a debate, love. Quite frankly, you don't have it in you.
It's quite obvious that you spend so much time at home that you weren't given the chance to get to know real people beyond your computer screen. Generalizing and stereotyping are poor arguments, you god of debates. Women are stupid just because you say so? That's what you think and that's subjective. You are on your right to hate females if you want it so bad, it is your problem if you lose the opportunity of getting to know people just because your closed mind.
By the way, your mom can't be very happy with a son who thinks she's a fucking stupid airhead.
It's quite obvious, is it? I have moved to so many places, met so many different people because of the life style I lived of moving around. In every area (except this one, been here for half a year and starting college soon), I have made plenty of friends, and I tend to know far more people in one area than others. So when you add that up with all the other people in different areas I have lived, I would only assume I know far more people than you do.
Don't try to make things personal, it is petty and irrational. It saves me from having to point out that your assumptions are wrong, and assumptions on someones personal life has nowhere in rational debate.
You would do well to remember that.
This is not generalization out of nothing. I have observed. Like I said, I move around a lot in my life and observe people and interact with them.
The majority of women I talk to tend to be idiots. Some impress me, and one of them on here is my favorite user. We do what I base my judgement on women on other areas of life so much. If we are trying to figure out something between two certain things, we take a select few, then we base our research on what those select few do, have, etc compared to the other data collected.
When we are figuring out something between two types, let's say humans (blacks, whites, asians, female, male, do we study 'every' one in one of those groups, or do we observe the most we can? If the vast majority of our data shows a certain pattern, that is what we conclude. As a species.
Again, if you need this explained, I am baffled.
What I love with manginas and women is this whole "you have bad arguments" thing...Ok. I have bad arguments. I will accept this, if you can prove it. Asking manginas and prove that the person they say has bad arguments actually has bad arguments is like kryptonite to them.
You really need it explained you need to give reason and points instead of just stating something? Could you imagine the world we would live in if we went by that rationality?
"I seen a flying pig."
- "Really? I don't need to ask for proof, your statement about it is enough to show me you are right".
That is all I see when someone 'states' I have bad arguments without actually proving it.
Women are stupid because I said so? Where did I say that? Where did I say "I just think women are stupid"?
Is that your tactic? Can't counter anything I actually say, and so have to just make up things and claim I said them? And you say 'I' have bad arguments?
I said I have observed this, I have witnissed this, and I have experienced their idiocy.
Being that I used to be a feminist myself, I know from both ends of the road on this subject and not just coming to a conclusion on this from one area of life.
Like I said. I hate women, but I clearly implied that I am open to a woman showing me she is different. I have had many female friends, if not slightly more female friends. I know there are good women out there, but in general I have seen there aren't much.
I do not hate my mother. She has done a lot for me and my family since I was a child.
Do you have any basis for an argument other than this princess mentality thing. My brain is quite alive, don't twist my words, Familiar with the term Never argue with a fool otherwise people will not know the difference.you're the fool not me (just to be clear) peter out.
1. Not mentioning the princess mentality at all, saying how you call people a keyboard warrior because someone dares speak their opinion on the opposite side of things to you.
2. I mentioned how you could not understand something so simple.
3. I mention how I no longer take women seriously at the start, and that they have to prove that they are not like the majority of females before I take them seriously.
4. I mention how the majority of women I speak to can't grasp rationality. (How you responded to my previous reply just proves it).
5. Princess mentality involved.
6. Princess mentality involved.
7. I call you princess, not mentioning the princess mentality. I explain how you're assumption to try to belittle me is a bad way to go given that I have had many women interested in me.
8. The 'funny' part.
9. I imply that you are implying that if sombody dares mention any flaw your gender has, then they need to "grow some balls".
10. I mention how stupid it was of you to try debate with me due to you lacking rationality.
Ok. So let me get this straight. Out of ten points/paragraphs, I only mention the princess mentality 'twice', yet "the princess mentality thing is all I have"? Again, you do nothing but prove my point.
So yes, I have a lot of basis, simply because you choose not to acknowledge them because you can't answer them does not mean they are not there. Sorry, when it comes to debating with me, you don't get to avoid points and be seen as a rational being aswell. Doesn't work that way.
Twisting your words? I am not twisting your words at all. I mentioned the inintentionally implied parts of your words. There is a difference. I don't expect you to understand that, though. Again, I don't give you that much credit. But please do show me where I 'twisted your words'.
Ah, ofcourse. So you expect me to take you seriously, and you think you are the one 'winning' (no other way to describe it) this debate, yet all you have here is "You are wrong because I said so. You stupid. You stupid, because I said so".
Let me get this straight. I make ten points, you can't answer any of them, you then make an excuse that is not at all valid and would only account for two of my points out of ten, still not answering any, then expect people to think you are the rational one here?
Maybe this comes as a shock to you (no surprise), but in order to win a debate, you have to address your points 'and' the opposing debater's points. You have not been able to defend your own, or show mine wrong, and your response shows that. Where as me? I back up my points and prove yours wrong.
Now, don't get me wrong, I know how you will respond. "You didn't prove my points wrong", and you will give no reason to suggest the reasons I said your points are wrong, as wrong. Yet you will still expect to be taken seriously.
"You're stupid. I win because I said so". Get your stupid school-yard antics out of here. You have to be atleast average in rationality to compete with the IIN community, let alone me.
hahahahaha I have no rationality to compete with the IIN community? is this a place to compete for anything, don't think so, log off of the Internet silly boy.
Insult, insult, insult. Is that all? Have nothing to offer to the debate?
No, this is a place for advice and debate. Debating is the point of proving one right, and the other wrong. So yes, when debate is involved you are aiming to win.
Do you not understand the basis of debate?
And you finnish with another insult.
Listen, chum. When a little girl is too devoid of reasoning and rationality to answer simple questions, do you think I am going to take what she says at heart? You are telling me to "Log off the internet", when the internet is not a place for you. You do not have the rationality to comment in places other than Youtube videos.
Again, I'm a silly boy? This silly boy just demolished you with rationality. I have never claimed to be a genius, but if I am silly, then what does that say about you? You just basically insulted yourself.
Once again, people are degrading women by not giving them enough credit. I've seen chicks mess dudes and other girls up before. In one fight, Girl 1 slammed girl 2's head into the hood of a car then started kicking her. It was awesome. Blood everywhere.
Not all men are stronger than women. A lot of men in my area don't work out because we really don't have any reason to. It's too damn hot. And there's a lot of Italians so quite a few men are the same size as the women. Nobody is giving women enough credit here. I've seen chicks mess guys up before. Blood everywhere. Though, there really aren't that many fights unless the kids from the town over start some shit.
Is it normal for a guy to be willing to hit a girl?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Hey. Would love to mention this. But. Erm. Go fuck yourself?
If you want equality, then you get equality. Why should we not be allowed to use our strength simply because we're stronger? Doesn't that kind of defeat the whole purpose of having strength?
So basically you believe that you should allow women to hit men without any retaliation?
"Oh no, please don't hold me so I can't hit you, that will teach me such a huge lesson on why I shouldn't hit people".
You are sexist. You want to be treated equal without any of the negatives.
If you are stupid to hit someone stronger than you, then you deal with the consequences of that bigger thing hitting you back.
Fuck. Women are stupid. You expect the lion not to eat you when you poke at it. That's how stupid anyone with this "Don't hit girls" mentality is.
I thought male strength was something to protect men, not something that protects the one hurting the man. Quite funny how the one that gets the benefit of men being stronger is women, isn't it?
If you are stupid to hit something bigger, then you have to deal with it.
By your rationality, if someone weaker than another man hits a man, that man has no right to hit back?
Fuck. Women and their princess mentality. "I can do this, but you are not allowed to do anything about it. I'm such a little princess that expects to have all of the choice men have, yet none of the responsibility" Boo fucking hoo.
You're a fine example of why I am bordering on hating women as a whole.
--
shade_ilmaendu
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
-
Bel101
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
Moonbow
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
-
CheyChey
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-2
-2
-
Mr.T
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Female who agrees. Preferrably you shouldn't hit anyone, but really? Someone hits me first, you know damn well I'm going to defend myself.
Though I probably would pull my punches a little if it was someone significantly smaller or weaker than me, and I wouldnt hit a child. I'm not a very violent person and I'm certainly not looking to break anyone. :P
I see you are comparing humans to animals. I think that most of us humans are developed enough as beings to rely on mental skills rather than physical strength. A fully rational human should never use violence in order to solve a conflict. So, a woman hasn't the right to hit a man, and an attacked man can defend himself, which is very different from actually attacking her in turn.
Pitifully, some people don't dare to resign the use of the strength of their muscles because that's the only thing they have.
--
shade_ilmaendu
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
3
3
-
GoraIntoDesiGals
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Comparing humans to animals? Why does everyone always forget that humans are animals?
--
Bel101
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-2
-2
If you are a human and therefore just another animal, why don't you get rid of your computer, TV, cell phone, car, clothes, burn your books and go to live to the forest?
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
3
3
-
shade_ilmaendu
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
Ah. Ok. Most animals do not make nests. So why don't birds just get rid of their nests, otherwise they are not animals.
If you need it explained that simply because our species are different from the others, that makes us non animals, then you stun me with that idiocy.
Especially given that animals have all sorts of different habitats.
--
Bel101
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
humans can draw a line between self defense and a point where it becomes just beating an attacker when you're in control. It can happen when you're fighting a weaker opponent.
Following your former statement, does the fact that man is rational make him less of an animal?
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
So, you're saying that because we are more rational than other animals to the point of being able to not fight back, that makes us non animals instead of justr an animal with new understanding? You are trying to put morality before biology.
Because man is rational, that makes him less of an animal? Well let's see. There are plenty of intelligent animals out there. Simply because they are more intelligent/rational than the others, that must mean they are not animals either, correct? For example. There are apes than can sign language. That must means Apes are not animals, because the only other animal that can do that are humans, and they aren't animals to you.
Is everything black and white for you? Yes we try to use our intellect to overcome our nature, but we must never forget that we are animals. And I would love to live closer to nature, but because of school I'm kind of stuck in apartments for the time being. :/
My point is that people have to accept that we are still animals, we have to understand that side of us as well because it is there, and if you repress it in the wrong ways it can jump out when you don't want it to.
Point still stands, you really shouldn't have to hit people, but if it's in self defense? Maybe it's because of my own history, but it is what it is. I've been a victim before, I won't be again. I'm sure most people, if needed, would defend themselves or their loved ones if given no other choice.
--
Bel101
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
Mr.T
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Of course we would. I mean, you can try to use your strength to keep your attacker from moving, especially if you're stronger. What isn't fair to do is smacking them till you get tired of it taking advantage of your physical superiority. That's self defense no more, that's ATTACKING for the sake of dirty revenge. Most humans are intellectually developed enough to handle such a situation in a fair way to both parts.
Humans are on a higher intellectual level than animals. That's what makes us different from them and makes people considered better than animals. Whether we're considered animals or not doesn't change what and who we are. A rose by any other name would smell as sweet.
"Pitifully, some people don't dare to resign the use of the strength of their muscles because that's the only thing they have."
People have every right to defend themselves with the only thing they have. Or should they just take the verbal beatings when they lack wit?
You dumb, fucking retard! Would you hit a 5-year-old girl that hit you, or a 90-year-old woman? After all, they're your equals.
There is more than one way to deal with a woman who hits you and the best way is to get your ass out of there pronto and don't go back!
If you don't change your way of thinking, you're going to end up in prison around some men that are going to make you whimper like a little girl as they take turns with you and it will serve you right, Asshole!
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
-
Mr.T
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I love the irony. You call me an idiot while making a completely idiotic statement. So now you are comparing average aged women to children and old people? Do I have to spoon feed women aswell? Afterall, we are comparing them to children.
No, I would not hit a five year old simply because she is a girl, I wouldn't hit a five year old at all, nor a 90 year old. Can't believe you would compare women to five year olds and people at an age of dependance due to old age. All you done there in your foolish attempt to prove me wrong is make yourself look like a moron.
Oh, I see. Best thing to do is just let someone hit you. Ok. Next time anyone hits you, even in 'your' home, then you should not retaliate. What? It's your mentality, not mine. So what does this woman learn from...Oh, nothing happening to her after hitting someone? "Oh my God! The man I hit just left the room! I so go taught my lesson why I shouldn't hit others".
You're a smart one, ain't you.
Oh, I see. So if 'I' retaliate to a woman hitting me 'I' am the one to be punished? Oh, I see. Don't worry, chum. What I would serve in prison would be far more better that being a brain-dead mangina like yourself (assuming you are a man, if not, surprised - sarcasm).
Oh? So you are saying if a man hits a woman, he deserves to be raped? Is that what you're saying? So in the same sense, if a woman hit a man, she should be raped, and she would deserve it, right?
Fuck. I would ask you to get a clue, but you lack any brain cells to accurately comment without contradicting yourself.
You need a brain to try debate with me, love. You lack one.
--
iEatZombies_
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Just a heads up: This particular person you're commenting to is literally just trying to start shit. They never have any logic behind what they say and they've only left negative comments on IIN.
Not worth your time.
On a side note: I had a dream about IIN last night and you were in it. You went and got yourself a girlfriend. You two were very much happy. It was nice. =)
And Charli.m ate too much peanut butter.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Lol. You're the third person today that has apparently had a dream about me.
--
Mr.T
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
iEatZombies_
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You're just so dreamy.
Were they all about the same? That would be really neat.
And did Charli.m eat too much peanut butter in them?
Begone, troll! You have no power here!
Go fuck myself? You go fuck yourself. what's with all the hostility trying to be the keyboard warrior? You said "Why should we not be allowed to use our strength simply because we're stronger" are you taking the piss because that statement does not make any sense so to prove this strength you beat up a woman provoked or not it's wrong. I'm sexist? No I'm not you're a macho chauvinistic pig. "Women are stupid"? and men aren't? stupidity has nothing to do with gender. Princess mentality where did this come from not all women have that mentality I know I don't that shit is wack anyways. I think your issue here you are angry at the whole female populace I bet some "princess" fucked you over and you're in that I fucking hate women phase get over it, it's pathetic. Or maybe every woman rejects you so the only thing for you to do is to hate them cognitive dissonance? These ridiculous beliefs you have are so embedded in your brain it's not even funny, A paradigm shift is what you need after you grow some balls
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
Mr.T
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Ah, ofcourse. If anyone holds you to your "equality" then they are simply keyboard warriors. This is why I can't take women seriously.
If you cannot understand that statement, then I am baffled. You are brain dead.
Yes, I am a woman hater, and rightfully so. I will not disrespect a woman for no reason, although she will have to prove herself that she is not among the majority of what women are nowadays before I start to like her. This is a result of how women like yourself are just filled with idiocy, that women have to prove themselves to me before I can take them seriously. A hell of a lot of proving.
Yes, women are stupid. The amount of women I have debated with on here and in other places show that women just can't grasp rationality. Yes, there are some, and I like those ones, but the average woman, in my experience, just can't grasp rationality.
Not all women have it, most do. You included. "I can hit you, but you are not allowed to do anything about it". Princess mentality. You want to do things at others expense, then think it's wrong if they have anything to say about it. Again. Princess mentality.
Lol. When you then say "I know I don't". Hilarious. Yes, love, you very much do. No, princess mentality women will never admit to it. I gave a fine example of you having a princess mentality. Sorry, but when debating with me, don't expect to have your cake and eat it, too. Just doesn't work that way.
Ah, once again. A lovely sense of the princess mentality. "It can't be us females that have given you a rational reason to dislike us, it must be because you were rejected, etc". Again. Princess mentality.
Listen, princess. When it comes to the rejection ratio, I have rejected far more. I have not even asked a female to be my partner, nor do I ever plan to until I want a child, if even then.
You're talking to the guy that went out with a female for a skateboard, then broke up with them after it broke. Believe me, hunny, your gender may be wanted by countless men, but not me. Get over yourselves. You have actual reasons to be disliked.
Funny? They were never supposed to be.
Ah, if I do not agree that rainbows shine out of your asses, I need to grow some balls, right?
My God. You're relatively new here. Perhaps a few months? You should know by now that you need more than princess mentality to beat me in a debate, love. Quite frankly, you don't have it in you.
--
Bel101
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
CheyChey
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
It's quite obvious that you spend so much time at home that you weren't given the chance to get to know real people beyond your computer screen. Generalizing and stereotyping are poor arguments, you god of debates. Women are stupid just because you say so? That's what you think and that's subjective. You are on your right to hate females if you want it so bad, it is your problem if you lose the opportunity of getting to know people just because your closed mind.
By the way, your mom can't be very happy with a son who thinks she's a fucking stupid airhead.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
It's quite obvious, is it? I have moved to so many places, met so many different people because of the life style I lived of moving around. In every area (except this one, been here for half a year and starting college soon), I have made plenty of friends, and I tend to know far more people in one area than others. So when you add that up with all the other people in different areas I have lived, I would only assume I know far more people than you do.
Don't try to make things personal, it is petty and irrational. It saves me from having to point out that your assumptions are wrong, and assumptions on someones personal life has nowhere in rational debate.
You would do well to remember that.
This is not generalization out of nothing. I have observed. Like I said, I move around a lot in my life and observe people and interact with them.
The majority of women I talk to tend to be idiots. Some impress me, and one of them on here is my favorite user. We do what I base my judgement on women on other areas of life so much. If we are trying to figure out something between two certain things, we take a select few, then we base our research on what those select few do, have, etc compared to the other data collected.
When we are figuring out something between two types, let's say humans (blacks, whites, asians, female, male, do we study 'every' one in one of those groups, or do we observe the most we can? If the vast majority of our data shows a certain pattern, that is what we conclude. As a species.
Again, if you need this explained, I am baffled.
What I love with manginas and women is this whole "you have bad arguments" thing...Ok. I have bad arguments. I will accept this, if you can prove it. Asking manginas and prove that the person they say has bad arguments actually has bad arguments is like kryptonite to them.
You really need it explained you need to give reason and points instead of just stating something? Could you imagine the world we would live in if we went by that rationality?
"I seen a flying pig."
- "Really? I don't need to ask for proof, your statement about it is enough to show me you are right".
That is all I see when someone 'states' I have bad arguments without actually proving it.
Women are stupid because I said so? Where did I say that? Where did I say "I just think women are stupid"?
Is that your tactic? Can't counter anything I actually say, and so have to just make up things and claim I said them? And you say 'I' have bad arguments?
I said I have observed this, I have witnissed this, and I have experienced their idiocy.
Being that I used to be a feminist myself, I know from both ends of the road on this subject and not just coming to a conclusion on this from one area of life.
Like I said. I hate women, but I clearly implied that I am open to a woman showing me she is different. I have had many female friends, if not slightly more female friends. I know there are good women out there, but in general I have seen there aren't much.
I do not hate my mother. She has done a lot for me and my family since I was a child.
Do you have any basis for an argument other than this princess mentality thing. My brain is quite alive, don't twist my words, Familiar with the term Never argue with a fool otherwise people will not know the difference.you're the fool not me (just to be clear) peter out.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Oh, ofcourse, princess.
Let me go through my paragraphs.
1. Not mentioning the princess mentality at all, saying how you call people a keyboard warrior because someone dares speak their opinion on the opposite side of things to you.
2. I mentioned how you could not understand something so simple.
3. I mention how I no longer take women seriously at the start, and that they have to prove that they are not like the majority of females before I take them seriously.
4. I mention how the majority of women I speak to can't grasp rationality. (How you responded to my previous reply just proves it).
5. Princess mentality involved.
6. Princess mentality involved.
7. I call you princess, not mentioning the princess mentality. I explain how you're assumption to try to belittle me is a bad way to go given that I have had many women interested in me.
8. The 'funny' part.
9. I imply that you are implying that if sombody dares mention any flaw your gender has, then they need to "grow some balls".
10. I mention how stupid it was of you to try debate with me due to you lacking rationality.
Ok. So let me get this straight. Out of ten points/paragraphs, I only mention the princess mentality 'twice', yet "the princess mentality thing is all I have"? Again, you do nothing but prove my point.
So yes, I have a lot of basis, simply because you choose not to acknowledge them because you can't answer them does not mean they are not there. Sorry, when it comes to debating with me, you don't get to avoid points and be seen as a rational being aswell. Doesn't work that way.
Twisting your words? I am not twisting your words at all. I mentioned the inintentionally implied parts of your words. There is a difference. I don't expect you to understand that, though. Again, I don't give you that much credit. But please do show me where I 'twisted your words'.
Ah, ofcourse. So you expect me to take you seriously, and you think you are the one 'winning' (no other way to describe it) this debate, yet all you have here is "You are wrong because I said so. You stupid. You stupid, because I said so".
Let me get this straight. I make ten points, you can't answer any of them, you then make an excuse that is not at all valid and would only account for two of my points out of ten, still not answering any, then expect people to think you are the rational one here?
Maybe this comes as a shock to you (no surprise), but in order to win a debate, you have to address your points 'and' the opposing debater's points. You have not been able to defend your own, or show mine wrong, and your response shows that. Where as me? I back up my points and prove yours wrong.
Now, don't get me wrong, I know how you will respond. "You didn't prove my points wrong", and you will give no reason to suggest the reasons I said your points are wrong, as wrong. Yet you will still expect to be taken seriously.
"You're stupid. I win because I said so". Get your stupid school-yard antics out of here. You have to be atleast average in rationality to compete with the IIN community, let alone me.
--
CheyChey
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
hahahahaha I have no rationality to compete with the IIN community? is this a place to compete for anything, don't think so, log off of the Internet silly boy.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Insult, insult, insult. Is that all? Have nothing to offer to the debate?
No, this is a place for advice and debate. Debating is the point of proving one right, and the other wrong. So yes, when debate is involved you are aiming to win.
Do you not understand the basis of debate?
And you finnish with another insult.
Listen, chum. When a little girl is too devoid of reasoning and rationality to answer simple questions, do you think I am going to take what she says at heart? You are telling me to "Log off the internet", when the internet is not a place for you. You do not have the rationality to comment in places other than Youtube videos.
Again, I'm a silly boy? This silly boy just demolished you with rationality. I have never claimed to be a genius, but if I am silly, then what does that say about you? You just basically insulted yourself.
Once again, people are degrading women by not giving them enough credit. I've seen chicks mess dudes and other girls up before. In one fight, Girl 1 slammed girl 2's head into the hood of a car then started kicking her. It was awesome. Blood everywhere.
Not all men are stronger than women. A lot of men in my area don't work out because we really don't have any reason to. It's too damn hot. And there's a lot of Italians so quite a few men are the same size as the women. Nobody is giving women enough credit here. I've seen chicks mess guys up before. Blood everywhere. Though, there really aren't that many fights unless the kids from the town over start some shit.