I wouldn't know, ma'am. But I mean, who wants to be dominated or controlled?
Regarding the underlying subject of this thread, I'll admit that feminism seems to have gotten out of hand; still, I assert that gender equality is a must for a civilized society.
For a submissive person, which I believe most women naturally are, being dominated is, as I called it "hot." This does not mean being trampled, treated like trash, undervalued, etc. It means when your man says, "young lady, you are coming with me, right now!" You readily comply. :D
All joking aside, I am glad that you, a woman, are able to agree that feminism has gotten out of hand. I apologize if my initial story sounded weirder than what I was trying to say. :)
I still don't get it. It's my opinion that submissiveness/passiveness is for the weak, pure and simple. Conversely, I consider defiance to be a virtue.
And where did you get the idea that I'm a woman....?
Okay, whatever. I guess I misunderstood where you were coming from, if indeed you are a man, then I apologize. I guess misanthropes don't have to be female. Men have it hard too. So, no offense intended. I am not challenging your "manliness" in any way. But if you are a man, I am surprised that you jeer at the idea of submissiveness. Since you think submission is for the weak, you sound like a strong dominating person. However, wouldn't you want a more meek and submissive partner, so that you two don't clash? Oh wait, you're a misanthrope, love is too bitter and pointless to even think about...right?
I could be male or female. Who knows. But the apparent fact that you consider misanthropy to be a feminine thing is pretty strange to me.
"However, wouldn't you want a more meek and submissive partner, so that you two don't clash?"
Where's the fun in that? ;)
"Oh wait, you're a misanthrope, love is too bitter and pointless to even think about...right?"
Could this possibly be a serious inquiry? Or am I sensing an attitude? :/
Yeah, well, I guess hating mankind includes "womenkind" these days too, doesn't it? To be perfectly honest, I didn't careful read your screen name at first, and thought Is aw the word "miss" in there. A foolish mistake due to skimming rather than reading, sorry.
So, if the "fun" idea of screaming and being screamed at, throwing things at each other, and getting a divorce appeals to you, knock yourself out.
Sure, I have an attitude, because you seem to as well. If you are so cynical though, I do seriously wonder why. If you have really seriously experienced the beauty of love, perhaps you would be less so.
Is it normal for a girl to be an antifeminist?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I wouldn't know, ma'am. But I mean, who wants to be dominated or controlled?
Regarding the underlying subject of this thread, I'll admit that feminism seems to have gotten out of hand; still, I assert that gender equality is a must for a civilized society.
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
For a submissive person, which I believe most women naturally are, being dominated is, as I called it "hot." This does not mean being trampled, treated like trash, undervalued, etc. It means when your man says, "young lady, you are coming with me, right now!" You readily comply. :D
All joking aside, I am glad that you, a woman, are able to agree that feminism has gotten out of hand. I apologize if my initial story sounded weirder than what I was trying to say. :)
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I still don't get it. It's my opinion that submissiveness/passiveness is for the weak, pure and simple. Conversely, I consider defiance to be a virtue.
And where did you get the idea that I'm a woman....?
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Okay, whatever. I guess I misunderstood where you were coming from, if indeed you are a man, then I apologize. I guess misanthropes don't have to be female. Men have it hard too. So, no offense intended. I am not challenging your "manliness" in any way. But if you are a man, I am surprised that you jeer at the idea of submissiveness. Since you think submission is for the weak, you sound like a strong dominating person. However, wouldn't you want a more meek and submissive partner, so that you two don't clash? Oh wait, you're a misanthrope, love is too bitter and pointless to even think about...right?
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I could be male or female. Who knows. But the apparent fact that you consider misanthropy to be a feminine thing is pretty strange to me.
"However, wouldn't you want a more meek and submissive partner, so that you two don't clash?"
Where's the fun in that? ;)
"Oh wait, you're a misanthrope, love is too bitter and pointless to even think about...right?"
Could this possibly be a serious inquiry? Or am I sensing an attitude? :/
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yeah, well, I guess hating mankind includes "womenkind" these days too, doesn't it? To be perfectly honest, I didn't careful read your screen name at first, and thought Is aw the word "miss" in there. A foolish mistake due to skimming rather than reading, sorry.
So, if the "fun" idea of screaming and being screamed at, throwing things at each other, and getting a divorce appeals to you, knock yourself out.
Sure, I have an attitude, because you seem to as well. If you are so cynical though, I do seriously wonder why. If you have really seriously experienced the beauty of love, perhaps you would be less so.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Wtf?
I said nothing about screaming, throwing things, or divorce.
Furthermore, what "attitude," ma'am? Not really following.