Is it normal for a 19 years old having that many sexual partners?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

↑ View this comment's parent

← View full post
Comments ( 13 ) Sort: best | oldest
  • VirgilManly
    9 years ago | pl

    It's no more snobbish than preferring blondes over brunettes, or Asian women over black or white women.

    Sexual inhibition has nothing to do with it.
    Take for an example a person with many partners but only wants sex in one position and with the lights off, Vs. someone who believes in having few partners but wants it in every conceivable position as well as anal, oral & with the curtains open so the neighbors can see.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    Report
    -1
    -1
      -
    • dom180
      9 years ago | pl

      Perhaps you're right. I disagree, but I can't articulate it. I think turning your nose up at someone because of the colour of their hair or race is just as snobbish, though.

      PS. Sorry for re-editing so many times. Your reply made me squirm a little as I re-evaluated myself, and it still is. And I should clarify that for me, "turning your nose up at someone" and "being snobbish to someone" means rejecting them because you think you're too good for them.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
      Report
      3
      3
        -
      • VirgilManly
        9 years ago | pl

        It seems to me that you want to judge those who prefer few partners but don't want others judging you for having many.

        Because sex is such an individual thing, everyone has their own preferences. It is what it is.

        I guess the key is finding sex partners who share ones own view of sex. Then there won't be conflicts.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
        Report
        1
        1
          -
        • dom180
          9 years ago | pl

          I'm not trying to be judge-y, although it wouldn't be the first time I'd been judge-y without realising it. If I turned down someone because they had few sexual partners, which I wouldn't ever do, you'd be well within your rights to judge me just as heavily.

          I agree with you, it is what it is.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
          Report
          0
          0
    • SkullsNRoses
      9 years ago | pl

      "amp"?

      Comment Hidden ( show )
      Report
      1
      1
        -
      • disthing
        9 years ago | pl

        IIN sometimes can't deal with the & sign and sticks an 'amp' in it.

        This often happens after a comment is edited - suddenly the & has an 'amp' in it.

        Similarly, if you edit a comment you've made with a link in, sometimes it messes up the link with a load of HTML-type code surrounding it.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
        Report
        1
        1
          -
        • disthing
          9 years ago | pl

          For example...

          & and http://www.google.com

          After an edit and save, becomes...

          &amp; and <a href="http://www.google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com</a>

          Comment Hidden ( show )
          Report
          0
          0
        • VirgilManly
          9 years ago | pl

          ^^^Like he said. It was edited.
          It is probably HTML abbreviation for ampersand.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
          Report
          0
          0
      • EccentricWeird
        9 years ago | pl

        It's a device used to make guitars louder.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
        Report
        0
        0