I have not "decided" that for her, it depends on her wishes.
And you talk about a woman enjoying staying at home and serving her man and raising her kids? At the expense of her career? At the expense of her individual freedom? That is SEXIST.
The "feminine qualities" you are talking about are a part of universal culture. They are a result of our ancestors who used to think that women are inferior to men. That is why cooking and babysitting are tasks considered "womanly". I don't mean to say that these tasks are easy, I just want to say that these tasks don't provide exposure to the world that other tasks provide.
Honestly, I think you are a SEXIST person who is against liberation of women.
Yes, a career will make a woman financially independent. A career gives intellectual stimulation which can't be gained from raising children and being a wife. Giving up a career makes a woman financially dependent on a man. Financial dependence on someone is probably the worst thing to experience. What if your relationship doesn't work out?
Your career is not going to get up one day and say that it doesn't love you any more.
I think went too far when I said that I will be a stay-at-home dad. I just meant to say that I will partake the burden of babysitting, and make sure that my wife's career isn't affected by the burden of the kids.
The point I am trying to make is that the woman shouldn't always be the one who has to sacrifice on her career for the kids. Sacrificing on career doesn't always mean sitting at home. I am just disgusted with those men who don't sacrifice on their career at all for their kids and don't understand the seriousness of her sacrifice when their wife does that.
Some people have a mindset that babysitting and sacrificing on career is a woman's role in a relationship. I just wish to eradicate that mindset through my post. I am not against those women who are stay-at-home moms. I am against the mindset that staying at home for kids is a thing which can be done only by a woman. In order to establish my stand, I said that I want to be stay-at-home dad.
Is it normal for a 20 year old male to feel extremely feminist?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I have not "decided" that for her, it depends on her wishes.
And you talk about a woman enjoying staying at home and serving her man and raising her kids? At the expense of her career? At the expense of her individual freedom? That is SEXIST.
The "feminine qualities" you are talking about are a part of universal culture. They are a result of our ancestors who used to think that women are inferior to men. That is why cooking and babysitting are tasks considered "womanly". I don't mean to say that these tasks are easy, I just want to say that these tasks don't provide exposure to the world that other tasks provide.
Honestly, I think you are a SEXIST person who is against liberation of women.
--
nikkiclaire
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
I like how you continue to decide whats best for us. What "tasks" should I do, please tell me what is best for me.
A career and exposure to the world is better for me than raising children and being a wife, is this what you think?
--
Anonymous Post Author
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yes, a career will make a woman financially independent. A career gives intellectual stimulation which can't be gained from raising children and being a wife. Giving up a career makes a woman financially dependent on a man. Financial dependence on someone is probably the worst thing to experience. What if your relationship doesn't work out?
Your career is not going to get up one day and say that it doesn't love you any more.
--
nikkiclaire
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Well you will be in that boat when you're sitting on your ass while making your "wife" have a career.
--
aaaa1234
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I think went too far when I said that I will be a stay-at-home dad. I just meant to say that I will partake the burden of babysitting, and make sure that my wife's career isn't affected by the burden of the kids.
The point I am trying to make is that the woman shouldn't always be the one who has to sacrifice on her career for the kids. Sacrificing on career doesn't always mean sitting at home. I am just disgusted with those men who don't sacrifice on their career at all for their kids and don't understand the seriousness of her sacrifice when their wife does that.
Some people have a mindset that babysitting and sacrificing on career is a woman's role in a relationship. I just wish to eradicate that mindset through my post. I am not against those women who are stay-at-home moms. I am against the mindset that staying at home for kids is a thing which can be done only by a woman. In order to establish my stand, I said that I want to be stay-at-home dad.