I would like to know some of these valid arguments for the devoutly religious.
I vote for devoutly scientific. A devoutly scientific person would believe in the evidence without regard for where it may lead him. If the evidence leads him to the existence of a creator, that is what he will believe.
Conversely, if evidence could ever prove that God did not exist, a devoutly religious person would disregard that evidence and their beliefs would go unchanged.
Is it better to be devoutly religious or devoutly scientific?
← View full post
I would like to know some of these valid arguments for the devoutly religious.
I vote for devoutly scientific. A devoutly scientific person would believe in the evidence without regard for where it may lead him. If the evidence leads him to the existence of a creator, that is what he will believe.
Conversely, if evidence could ever prove that God did not exist, a devoutly religious person would disregard that evidence and their beliefs would go unchanged.